Effects of pyrolyzed semi-char blend ratio on coal combustion and pollution emission in a 0.35 MW pulverized coal-fired furnace

Yonghong YAN, Liutao SUN, Zhengkang PENG, Hongliang QI, Li LIU, Rui SUN

PDF(1722 KB)
PDF(1722 KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1) : 78-90. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-020-0678-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of pyrolyzed semi-char blend ratio on coal combustion and pollution emission in a 0.35 MW pulverized coal-fired furnace

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The effects of blend ratio on combustion and pollution emission characteristics for co-combustion of Shenmu pyrolyzed semi-char (SC), i.e., residuals of the coal pyrolysis chemical processing, and Shenhua bituminous coal (SB) were investigated in a 0.35 MW pilot-scale pulverized coal-fired furnace. The gas temperature and concentrations of gaseous species (O2, CO, CO2, NOx and HCN) were measured in the primary combustion zone at different blend ratios. It is found that the standoff distance of ignition changes monotonically from 132 to 384 mm with the increase in pyrolyzed semi-char blend ratio. The effects on the combustion characteristics may be neglected when the blend ratio is less than 30%. Above the 30% blend ratio, the increase in blend ratio postpones ignition in the primary stage and lowers the burnout rate. With the blend ratio increasing, NOx emission at the furnace exit is smallest for the 30% blend ratio and highest for the 100% SC. The NOx concentration was 425 mg/m3 at 6% O2 and char burnout was 76.23% for the 45% blend ratio. The above results indicate that the change of standoff distance and NOx emission were not obvious when the blend ratio of semi-char is less than 45%, and carbon burnout changed a little at all blend ratios. The goal of this study is to achieve blending combustion with a large proportion of semi-char without great changes in combustion characteristics. So, an SC blend ratio of no more than 45% can be suitable for the burning of semi-char.

Keywords

pulverized-coal combustion / pyrolyzed semi-char / ignition characteristics / pollution emission / char burnout / blend ratio

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yonghong YAN, Liutao SUN, Zhengkang PENG, Hongliang QI, Li LIU, Rui SUN. Effects of pyrolyzed semi-char blend ratio on coal combustion and pollution emission in a 0.35 MW pulverized coal-fired furnace. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(1): 78‒90 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0678-z

References

[1]
Gong Z, Liu Z, Zhou T, Lu Q, Sun Y. Combustion and NO emission of Shenmu char in a 2 MW circulating fluidized bed. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(2): 1219–1226
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Yao Y, Lü Q, Zhu J, Ouyang Z, Zhou Z. Experimental study on preheating process of fine char in a circulating fluidized bed. Proceedings of CSEE, 35(17): 4417–4422 (in Chinese)
[3]
de Foy B, Lu Z, Streets D G. Satellite NO2 retrievals suggest China has exceeded its NOx reduction goals from the twelfth Five-Year Plan. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 35912
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Ulloa C, Borrego A G, Helle S, Gordon A L, García X. Char characterization and DTF assays as tools to predict burnout of coal blends in power plants. Fuel, 2005, 84(2–3): 247–257
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Wang P, Wang C, Tao Z, Yuan M, Du Y, Zhang J, Che D. Co-combustion characteristics of semi-coke and coal under air condition. In: Proceedings of ASME 2018 Power Conference, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA, 2018
[6]
Zhang J, Jia X, Wang C, Zhao N, Wang P, Che D. Experimental investigation on combustion and NO formation characteristics of semi-coke and bituminous coal blends. Fuel, 2019, 247(7): 87–96
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Huang Q, Li S, Li G, Zhao Y, Yao Q. Reduction of fine particulate matter by blending lignite with semi-char in a down-fired pulverized coal combustor. Fuel, 2016, 181(10): 1162–1169
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Liu G, Liu Q, Zhu B, Ren S, Meng F, Lin F. Co-combustion characteristics and reaction kinetics of pine char and anthracite blends. Journal of Iron & Steel Research, 2016, 28(5): 11–17 (in Chinese)
[9]
Wang P, Wang G, Zhang J, Lee J Y, Li Y, Wang C. Co-combustion characteristics and kinetic study of anthracite coal and palm kernel shell char. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 143(10): 736–745
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Clements B R, Zhuang Q, Pomalis R, Wong J, Campbell D. Ignition characteristics of co-fired mixtures of petroleum coke and bituminous coal in a pilot-scale furnace. Fuel, 2012, 97(6): 315–320
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Wang H, Zhang J, Wang G, Xu R, Zhang P, Liu S, Song T. Characteristics and kinetic analysis of co-combustion of brown coal and anthracite. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2016, 126(2): 447–454
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Faúndez J, Arias B, Rubiera F, Arenillas A, García X, Gordon A L, Pis J J. Ignition characteristics of coal blends in an entrained flow furnace. Fuel, 2007, 86(14): 2076–2080
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Sahu S G, Mukherjee A, Kumar M, Adak A K, Sarkar P, Biswas S, Tiwari H P, Das A, Banerjee P K. Evaluation of combustion behaviour of coal blends for use in pulverized coal injection (PCI). Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 73(1): 1014–1021
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Zeng G, Sun S, Yang X, Zhao Y, Zhao Z, Ye Z, Gao J. Effect of the primary-air velocity on ignition characteristics of bias pulverized-coal jets. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(3): 3182–3195
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Li Z, Liu Y, Chen Z, Zhu Q, Jia J, Li J, Wang Z, Qin Y. Effect of the air temperature on combustion characteristics and NOx emissions from a 0.5 MW pulverized coal-fired furnace with deep air staging. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(4): 2068–2074
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Prationo W, Zhang J, Cui J, Wang Y, Zhang L. Influence of inherent moisture on the ignition and combustion of wet Victorian brown coal in air-firing and oxy-fuel modes: part 1: the volatile ignition and flame propagation. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 138(10): 670–679
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Liu C, Li Z, Zhao Y, Chen Z. Influence of coal-feed rates on bituminous coal ignition in a full-scale tiny-oil ignition burner. Fuel, 2010, 89(7): 1690–1694
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Faúndez J, Arenillas A, Rubiera F, García X, Gordon A L, Pis J J. Ignition behaviour of different rank coals in an entrained flow reactor. Fuel, 2005, 84(17): 2172–2177
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Molina A, Murphy J J, Winter F, Haynes B S, Blevins L G, Shaddix C R. Pathways for conversion of char nitrogen to nitric oxide during pulverized coal combustion. Combustion and Flame, 2009, 156(3): 574–587
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Jovanovic R, Milewska A, Swiatkowski B, Goanta A, Spliethoff H. Sensitivity analysis of different devolatilisation models on predicting ignition point position during pulverized coal combustion in O2/N2 and O2/CO2 atmospheres. Fuel, 2012, 101(11): 23–37
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Riaza J, Khatami R, Levendis Y A, Alvarez L, Gil M V, Pevida C, Rubiera F, Pis J J. Single particle ignition and combustion of anthracite, semi-anthracite and bituminous coals in air and simulated oxy-fuel conditions. Combustion and Flame, 2014, 161(4): 1096–1108
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Park D C, Day S J, Nelson P F. Nitrogen release during reaction of coal char with O2, CO2, and H2O. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2005, 30(2): 2169–2175
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Glarborg P, Jensen A D, Johnsson J E. Fuel nitrogen conversion in solid fuel fired systems. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2003, 29(2): 89–113
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Lin J Y, Zhang S, Zhang L, Min Z, Tay H, Li C Z. HCN and NH3 formation during coal/char gasification in the presence of NO. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(10): 3719–3723
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFB0602002).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1722 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/