Effective diffusivity of oxygen in the ash layer of Huadian oil shale semicoke

Yiqun HUANG, Yiran LI, Man ZHANG, Boyu DENG, Hao KONG, Junfeng WANG, Junfu LYU, Hairui YANG, Lingmei WANG

PDF(1242 KB)
PDF(1242 KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (2) : 320-327. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-020-0674-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effective diffusivity of oxygen in the ash layer of Huadian oil shale semicoke

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Diffusion of oxygen in the ash layer usually dominated the combustion of oil shale semicoke particles due to the high ash content. Thus, effective diffusivity of oxygen in the ash layer was a crucial parameter worthy of careful investigation. In this paper, the effective diffusivity of oxygen in the ash layer of Huadian oil shale semicoke was measured directly using an improved Wicke-Kallenbach diffusion apparatus. The experimental results showed that higher temperature would lead to a higher effective diffusivity and a thicker ash layer had the negative effect. Especially, the effective diffusivity along the direction perpendicular to bedding planes was much lower than that along the direction parallel to bedding planes. In addition, an effective diffusivity model was developed, which could be used to describe the mass transfer of oxygen in the ash layer of oil shale semicoke.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

oil shale semicoke / diffusivity / pore structure / ash layer

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yiqun HUANG, Yiran LI, Man ZHANG, Boyu DENG, Hao KONG, Junfeng WANG, Junfu LYU, Hairui YANG, Lingmei WANG. Effective diffusivity of oxygen in the ash layer of Huadian oil shale semicoke. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(2): 320‒327 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0674-3

References

[1]
Strizhakova Y A, Usova T V. Current trends in the pyrolysis of oil shale: a review. Solid Fuel Chemistry, 2008, 42(4): 197–201
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Kok M V. Oil shale: pyrolysis, combustion, and environment: a review. Energy Sources, 2002, 24(2): 135–143
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Kuang W, Lu M, Yeboah I, Qian G, Duan X, Yang J, Chen D, Zhou X. A comprehensive kinetics study on non-isothermal pyrolysis of kerogen from green river oil shale. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 377: 120275
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Tian Y, Li M, Lai D, Chen Z, Gao S, Xu G. Characteristics of oil shale pyrolysis in a two-stage fluidized bed. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 26(2): 407–414
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Han X, Kulaots I, Jiang X, Suuberg E. Review of oil shale semicoke and its combustion utilization. Fuel, 2014, 126(12): 143–161
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Yang Y, Lu X, Wang Q, Mei L, Song D, Hong Y. Experimental study on combustion of low calorific oil shale semicoke in fluidized bed system. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30(11): 9882–9890
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Qin H, Sun B, Wang Q, Zhou M, Liu H, Li S. Analysis on influence factors of the characteristic of pore structure during combustion of oil shale semi-coke. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008, 28(35): 14–20 (in Chinese)
[8]
Wang X, Wang J, Qian J, Zhu Y. Diffusion effects in the ash layer of the oil shale char combustion. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 1987, 3(4): 4–11
[9]
Yang Y, Wang Q, Lu X, Li J, Liu Z. Combustion behaviors and pollutant emission characteristics of low calorific oil shale and its semi-coke in a lab-scale fluidized bed combustor. Applied Energy, 2018, 211: 631–638
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Mu M, Han X, Chen B, Jiang X. Oxidation characteristics of the semicoke from the retorting of oil shale and wheat straw blends in different atmospheres. Oil Shale, 2019, 36(1): 43–61
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Yörük C R, Meriste T, Sener S, Kuusik R, Trikkel A. Thermogravimetric analysis and process simulation of oxy-fuel combustion of blended fuels including oil shale, semicoke, and biomass. International Journal of Energy Research, 2018, 42(6): 2213–2224
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Wang P, Wang C, Du Y, Feng Q, Wang Z, Yao W, Liu J, Zhang J, Che D. Experiments and simulation on co-combustion of semi-coke and coal in a full-scale tangentially fired utility boiler. Energy & Fuels, 2019, 33(4): 3012–3027
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Wang J, Wang X. A study of the combustion reaction model of oil shale particles. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 1987, 3(3): 1–9
[14]
Huang Y, Zhang M, Lyu J, Yang H. Modeling study of combustion process of oil shale semicoke in a circulating fluidized bed boiler. Carbon Resources Conversion, 2018, 1(3): 273–278
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Han X, Jiang X, Yan J, Liu J. Effects of retorting factors on combustion properties of shale char. 2. porestructure. Energy & Fuels, 2011, 25(1): 97–102
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Bai J, Wang Q, Jiao G. Study on the pore structure of oil shale during low-temperature pyrolysis. Energy Procedia, 2012, 17(1): 1689–1696
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Tiwari P, Deo M, Lin C L, Miller J D. Characterization of oil shale pore structure before and after pyrolysis by using X-ray micro CT. Fuel, 2013, 107(9): 547–554
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Sun W, Chen S, Xu M, Wei Y, Fan T, Guo J. The diffusion of molecules inside porous materials with bidisperse pore structures. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 365: 201–219
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Le Blévec J M, Barthel E, Briens C. Measurement of volatile diffusivity in polymer particles. Chemical Engineering & Processing Process Intensification, 2000, 39(4): 315–322
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Zheng Y, Wang Q, Yang C, Qiu T. Experimental study on mass transport mechanism in poly (styrene-co-divinylbenzene) microspheres with hierarchical pore structure. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2019, 139: 183–192
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Wheeler A. Reaction rates and selectivity in catalyst pores. Advances in Catalysis, 1951, 3(6): 249–327
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Mota O D S, Campos J B L. Combustion of coke with high ash content in fluidised beds. Chemical Engineering Science, 1995, 50(3): 433–439
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Laurendeau N M. Heterogeneous kinetics of coal char gasification and combustion. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1978, 4(4): 221–270
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Sun J K, Hurt R H. Mechanisms of extinction and near-extinction in pulverized solid fuel combustion. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2000, 28(2): 2205–2213
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Wakao N, Smith J M. Diffusion in catalyst pellets. Chemical Engineering Science, 1962, 17(11): 825–834
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Johnson M F L, Stewart W E. Pore structure and gaseous diffusion in solid catalysts. Journal of Catalysis, 1965, 4(2): 248–252
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Fu W B, Zhang B L. Experimental determination of the equivalent mass diffusivity for a porous coal-ash particle. Journal of Combustionence & Technology, 1995, 101(3): 371–377 (in Chinese)
[28]
Yan J H, Ni M J, Zhang H T, Cen K F. Gas diffsuion through the ash layer of coal particle. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 1994, 15(3): 341–344 (in Chinese)
[29]
Liu J, Yan J, Han X, Jiang X. Study on the anisotropy of mass transfer for oxygen in the ash layer of shale char particles. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24(6): 3488–3497
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Yang Y, Lu X, Wang Q, Song D, Chen Y, Hong Y. Study on the anisotropy of mass transfer for oxygen in the ash layer of extremely low calorific oil shale semi-coke. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 128: 1494–1501
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Wicke E, Kallenbach R. The surface diffusion of carbon dioxide in active carbons. Colloid Journal, 1941, 97(2): 135–151 (in German)
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Cao L, He R. Gas diffusion in fractal porous media. Combustion Science and Technology, 2010, 182(7): 822–841
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgment

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1810126).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1242 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/