Please wait a minute...

Frontiers in Energy

Front. Energy    2020, Vol. 14 Issue (1) : 1-10     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-019-0655-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A space power system of free piston Stirling generator based on potassium heat pipe
Mingqiang LIN1, Jian MOU1(), Chunyun CHI1, Guotong HONG1, Panhe GE2, Gu HU2
1. Key Laboratory of Space Energy Conversion Technology, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
2. China Institute of Atomic Energy, China National Nuclear Corporation, Beijing 100822, China
Download: PDF(2391 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The power system of a free piston Stirling generator (FPSG) based on potassium heat pipes has been developed in this paper. Thanks to the advantages of long life, high reliability, and high overall thermal efficiency, the FPSG is a promising candidate for nuclear energy, especially in space exploration. In this paper, the recent progress of FPSG based on nuclear reactor for space use was briefly reviewed. A novel FPSG weighted only 4.2 kg was designed, and one dimensional thermodynamic modeling of the FPSG using Sage software was performed to estimate its performance. The experiment results indicated that this FPSG could provide 142.4 W at a thermal-to-electric efficiency of nearly 17.4%. Besides, the power system integrated with four FPSGs and potassium heat pipes was performed and the single machine failure test was conducted. The results show that this system could provide an electrical power of 300 W at an overall thermal efficiency of 7.3%. Thus, it is concluded that this power system is feasible and will have a great prospect for future applications.

Keywords free piston Stirling generator (FPSG)      potassium heat pipe      power system      energy conversion     
Corresponding Authors: Jian MOU   
Online First Date: 30 December 2019    Issue Date: 16 March 2020
 Cite this article:   
Mingqiang LIN,Jian MOU,Chunyun CHI, et al. A space power system of free piston Stirling generator based on potassium heat pipe[J]. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(1): 1-10.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/10.1007/s11708-019-0655-6
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/Y2020/V14/I1/1
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Mingqiang LIN
Jian MOU
Chunyun CHI
Guotong HONG
Panhe GE
Gu HU
Fig.1  Schematic diagram of the FPSG.
Fig.2  Working principle of the FPSG.
Fig.3  Sage model graphical interface of the FPSG.
Fig.4  Physical diagram of the FPSG.
Variable Value
Charge pressure/MPa 4.5
Temperature of heat source/K 800
Temperature of cold source/K 300
Mass of displacer/kg 0.04
Mass of piston/kg 0.5
Sectional area of displacer/mm2 530.9
Sectional area of piston/mm2 492.4
Sectional area of displacer rod/mm2 38.5
Equilibrium volume of compression space/mm3 7963.9
Equilibrium volume of expansion space/mm3 4778.4
Bounce space volume/mm3 31800
Tab.1  Geometrical and operating parameters
Fig.5  Layout of the FPSG experimental system.
Fig.6  Physical diagram of the FPSG experimental system.
Fig.7  Electrical power and thermal-to-electric efficiency versus heater temperature.
Fig.8  Layout and experimental physical diagram of the power system.
Fig.9  Schema of the heat pipe.
Fig.10  Layout of the FPSGs and heat pipes.
Fig.11  Temperature distribution of the heat collector block and Stirling heater head.
Fig.12  Total heating power and temperature of electric heating rods versus time.
Fig.13  Axial temperature distribution of heat pipe H at different times.
Fig.14  Electrical power of four FPSGs versus time.
Fig.15  Hot end temperature and frequency of four FPSGs versus time.
Parameter No.1 FPSG No.2 FPSG No.3 FPSG No.4 FPSG
Power/We 71.31 74.5 86.87 67.42
Frequency/Hz 61.08 61.09 61.11 61.09
Current/A 1.205 1.232 1.311 1.172
Voltage/V 58.861 60.42 66.188 57.553
Temperature difference/°C 14.8 15.72 17.9 16.2
Flow/(Lh–1) 44.198 41.838 48.688 47.890
Rejected heat/W 760.6 764.751 1013.379 902. 104
Efficiency 8.5% 8.9% 7.89% 6.95%
Tab.2  Output parameters of four FPSGs
Fig.16  Electrical power of four FPSGs versus time.
Fig.17  Heat head temperature of four FPSGs versus time.
Fig.18  Temperatures of three sections in heat pipe H versus time.
1 D Beard, W G Anderson, C Tarau High. Temperature water heat pipes for kilopower system. In: 15th International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Atlanta, USA, 2017
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-4698
2 C Wang, J Chen, S Qiu, W Tian, D Zhang, G H Su. Performance analysis of heat pipe radiator unit for space nuclear power reactor. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2017, 103: 74–84
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.01.015
3 J M P Tournier, M S El-Genk. Liquid metal loop and heat pipe radiator for space reactor power systems. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2006, 22(5): 1117–1134
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.20031
4 G M Gryaznov, V A Evtikhin, A N Chumanov, I P Bogush, I E Lyublinskii, A V Vertkov, N M Afanas’ev, V I Ionkin, I K Merkurisov, V I Yarygin. Parametric analysis of a number of space nuclear power systems with a heat-pipe energy-conversion system. Atomic Energy, 2000, 89(1): 541–545
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02673513
5 M S El-Genk. Energy conversion technologies for advanced radioisotope and nuclear reactor power systems for future planetary exploration. In: 21st International Conference on Thermoelectrics, Long Beach, USA, 2002, 375–380
6 Q Zhou, Y Xia, G Liu, X Ouyang. A miniature integrated nuclear reactor design with gravity independent. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2018, 340: 9–16
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.09.013
7 S Qiu, Y Gao, G Rinker, K Yanaga. Development of an advanced free-piston Stirling engine for micro combined heating and power application. Applied Energy, 2019, 235: 987–1000
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.036
8 J Mou, W Li, J Li, G Hong. Gas action effect of free piston Stirling engine. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 110: 278–286
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.12.020
9 M A Gibson, M H Briggs, J L Sanzi, M H Brace. Heat powered Stirling conversion for the demonstration using flattop fission (DUFF) test. In: Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space Conference, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2013
10 L Mason, J Casani, J Elliott, J P Fleurial, D Macpherson, B Nesmith , M Houts, R Bechtel, J, Werner R Kapernick, D Poston, L Qualls, R Lipinski, R Radel , S Bailey, A Weitzberg. A small fission power system for NASA planetary science missions. In: Proceedings of Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2011, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2011.
11 D I Poston, M Gibson, P R Mc Clure, T J Godfroy . Results of the KRUSTY nuclear system test. In: Proceedings NETS-2019, ANS, Richland, WA, USA, 2019
12 D I Poston, M Gibson, T J Godfroy , P R Mc Clure. Design of the KRUSTY reactor. In: Proceedings NETS-2018, ANS, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2018.
13 D I , Poston, M Gibson, C Bowman, J Creasy . Kilopower space reactor concept- reactor materials study. LA-UR-14–23402. Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA, 2014
14 D I Poston. Predicted performance of the KRUSTY reactor. In: Proceedings NETS-2018, ANS, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2018
15 M A Gibson, S R Oleson, D I Poston, P R McClure. NASA’s kilopower reactor development and the path to higher power missions. Technical Report, NASA, USA, NASA/TM—2017–219467, 2017
16 S H Zare, A R Tavakolpour-Saleh. Free piston Stirling engines: a review. International Journal of Energy Research, 2019, 43(6): 1–32
17 D Gedeon. Sage User’s Guide, Stirling, Pulse-Tube and Low-T Cooler Model Classes.10th ed. Athens, OH: Gedeon Associates, 2014
18 Z Yan. Thermal Energy and Power Engineering Testing Technology. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2005, 45–46 (in Chinese)
19 M A Gibson, L Mason, C Bowman. Development of NASA’s small fission power system for science and human exploration. In: 12th International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Cleveland, USA, 2014
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Ali EL YAAKOUBI, Kamal ATTARI, Adel ASSELMAN, Abdelouahed DJEBLI. Novel power capture optimization based sensorless maximum power point tracking strategy and internal model controller for wind turbines systems driven SCIG[J]. Front. Energy, 2019, 13(4): 742-756.
[2] Soheil RASHIDI, Akshay CARINGULA, Andy NGUYEN, Ijeoma OBI, Chioma OBI, Wei WEI. Recent progress in MoS2 for solar energy conversion applications[J]. Front. Energy, 2019, 13(2): 251-268.
[3] David Wenzhong GAO, Qiang WANG, Fang ZHANG, Xiaojing YANG, Zhigang HUANG, Shiqian MA, Qiao LI, Xiaoyan GONG, Fei-Yue WANG. Application of AI techniques in monitoring and operation of power systems[J]. Front. Energy, 2019, 13(1): 71-85.
[4] Shixi MA, Shengnan SUN, Hang WU, Dengji ZHOU, Huisheng ZHANG, Shilie WENG. Decoupling optimization of integrated energy system based on energy quality character[J]. Front. Energy, 2018, 12(4): 540-549.
[5] Eric TERVO, Elham BAGHERISERESHKI, Zhuomin ZHANG. Near-field radiative thermoelectric energy converters: a review[J]. Front. Energy, 2018, 12(1): 5-21.
[6] Peng GAO, Liwei WANG, Ruzhu WANG, Yang YU. Simulation and experiments on a solid sorption combined cooling and power system driven by the exhaust waste heat[J]. Front. Energy, 2017, 11(4): 516-526.
[7] S. SURENDER REDDY,Jae Young PARK,Chan Mook JUNG. Optimal operation of microgrid using hybrid differential evolution and harmony search algorithm[J]. Front. Energy, 2016, 10(3): 355-362.
[8] Nitin Kumar SAXENA,Ashwani Kumar SHARMA. Estimation of composite load model with aggregate induction motor dynamic load for an isolated hybrid power system[J]. Front. Energy, 2015, 9(4): 472-485.
[9] Nagulan SANTHOSH,Venkatesan BASKARAN,Arunachalam AMARKARTHIK. A review on front end conversion in ocean wave energy converters[J]. Front. Energy, 2015, 9(3): 297-310.
[10] C. K. ARAVIND,G. SARAVANA ILANGO,C. NAGAMANI. A smooth co-ordination control for a hybrid autonomous power system (HAPS) with battery energy storage (BES)[J]. Front. Energy, 2015, 9(1): 31-42.
[11] Y. K. BHATESHVAR,H. D. MATHUR,H. SIGUERDIDJANE. Impact of wind power generating system integration on frequency stabilization in multi-area power system with fuzzy logic controller in deregulated environment[J]. Front. Energy, 2015, 9(1): 7-21.
[12] Nitin SAXENA,Ashwani KUMAR. Reactive power compensation of an isolated hybrid power system with load interaction using ANFIS tuned STATCOM[J]. Front. Energy, 2014, 8(2): 261-268.
[13] Manoj Kumar PANDA, Gopinath PILLAI, Vijay KUMAR. An interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller for TCSC to improve the damping of power system oscillations[J]. Front Energ, 2013, 7(3): 307-316.
[14] Yajvender Pal VERMA, Ashwani KUMAR. Load frequency control in deregulated power system with wind integrated system using fuzzy controller[J]. Front Energ, 2013, 7(2): 245-254.
[15] Yajvender Pal VERMA, Ashwani KUMAR. Dynamic contribution of variable-speed wind energy conversion system in system frequency regulation[J]. Front Energ, 2012, 6(2): 184-192.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed