Thermodynamic assessment of hydrogen production via solar thermochemical cycle based on MoO2/Mo by methane reduction

Jiahui JIN, Lei WANG, Mingkai FU, Xin LI, Yuanwei LU

PDF(1537 KB)
PDF(1537 KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1) : 71-80. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-019-0652-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Thermodynamic assessment of hydrogen production via solar thermochemical cycle based on MoO2/Mo by methane reduction

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Inspired by the promising hydrogen production in the solar thermochemical (STC) cycle based on non-stoichiometric oxides and the operation temperature decreasing effect of methane reduction, a high-fuel-selectivity and CH4-introduced solar thermochemical cycle based on MoO2/Mo is studied. By performing HSC simulations, the energy upgradation and energy conversion potential under isothermal and non-isothermal operating conditions are compared. In the reduction step, MoO2: CH4 = 2 and 1020 K<Tred<1600 K are found to be most favorable for syngas selectivity and methane conversion. Compared to the STC cycle without CH4, the introduction of methane yields a much higher hydrogen production, especially at the lower temperature range and atmospheric pressure. In the oxidation step, a moderately excessive water is beneficial for energy conversion whether in isothermal or non-isothermal operations, especially at H2O: Mo= 4. In the whole STC cycle, the maximum non-isothermal and isothermal efficiency can reach 0.417 and 0.391 respectively. In addition, the predicted efficiency of the second cycle is also as high as 0.454 at Tred = 1200 K and Toxi = 400 K, indicating that MoO2 could be a new and potential candidate for obtaining solar fuel by methane reduction.

Keywords

MoO2/Mo based on solar thermochemical cycle / methanothermal reduction / isothermal and non-isothermal operation / syngas and hydrogen production / thermodynamic analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jiahui JIN, Lei WANG, Mingkai FU, Xin LI, Yuanwei LU. Thermodynamic assessment of hydrogen production via solar thermochemical cycle based on MoO2/Mo by methane reduction. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(1): 71‒80 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-019-0652-9

References

[1]
Chueh W C, Falter C, Abbott M, Scipio D, Furler P, Haile S M, Steinfeld A. High-flux solar-driven thermochemical dissociation of CO2 and H2O using nonstoichiometric ceria. Science, 2010, 330(6012): 1797–1801
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Chueh W C, Haile S M. A thermochemical study of ceria: exploiting an old material for new modes of energy conversion and CO2 mitigation. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical. Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1923, 2010(368): 3269–3294
[3]
Siegel N P, Miller J E, Ermanoski I, Diver R B, Stechel E B. Factors affecting the efficiency of solar driven metal oxide thermochemical cycles. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(9): 3276–3286
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Charvin P, Abanades S, Beche E, Lemont F, Flamant G. Hydrogen production from mixed cerium oxides via three-step water-splitting cycles. Solid State Ionics, 2009, 180(14–16): 1003–1010
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Carrillo R J, Scheffe J R. Advances and trends in redox materials for solar thermochemical fuel production. Solar Energy, 2017, 156: 3–20
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Ezbiri M, Takacs M, Theiler D, Michalsky R, Steinfeld A. Tunable thermodynamic activity of LaxSr1−xMnyAl1−yO3−d (0≤x≤1, 0≤y≤1) perovskites for solar thermochemical fuel synthesis. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2017, 5(8): 4172–4182
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Scheffe J R, Steinfeld A. Oxygen exchange materials for solar thermochemical splitting of H2O and CO2: a review. Materials Today, 2014, 17(7): 341–348
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Weibel D, Jovanovic Z R, Gálvez E, Steinfeld A. Mechanism of Zn particle oxidation by H2O and CO2 in the presence of ZnO. Chemistry of Materials, 2014, 26(22): 6486–6495
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Ackermann S, Scheffe J R, Steinfeld A. Diffusion of oxygen in ceria at elevated temperatures and its application to H2O/CO2 splitting thermochemical redox cycles. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2014, 118(10): 5216–5225
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Takacs M, Scheffe J R, Steinfeld A. Oxygen nonstoichiometry and thermodynamic characterization of Zr doped ceria in the 1573–1773 K temperature range. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2015, 17(12): 7813–7822
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Yadav D, Banerjee R. A review of solar thermochemical processes. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 54: 497–532
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Demont A, Abanades S. Solar thermochemical conversion of CO2 into fuel via two-step redox cycling of non-stoichiometric Mn-containing perovskite oxides. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2015, 3(7): 3536–3546
[13]
Scheffe J R, Weibel D, Steinfeld A. Lanthanum-strontium-manganese perovskites as redox materials for solar thermochemical splitting of H2O and CO2. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(8): 4250–4257
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Bork A H, Kubicek M, Struzik M, Rupp J L M. Perovskite La0.6Sr0.4Cr1−xCoxO3−d solid solutions for solar-thermochemical fuel production: strategies to lower the operation temperature. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2015, 3(30): 15546–15557
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Yang C K, Yamazaki Y, Aydin A, Haile S M. Thermodynamic and kinetic assessments of strontium-doped lanthanum manganite perovskites for two-step thermochemical water splitting. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2014, 2(33): 13612–13623
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Roeb M, Neises M, Monnerie N, Call F, Simon H, Sattler C, Schmücker M, Pitz-Paal R. Materials-related aspects of thermochemical water and carbon dioxide splitting: a review. Materials (Basel), 2012, 5(11): 2015–2054
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Demont A, Abanades S. High redox activity of Sr-substituted lanthanum manganite perovskites for two-step thermochemical dissociation of CO2. RSC Advances, 2014, 4(97): 54885–54891
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Kodama T, Shimizu T, Satoh T, Nakata M, Shimizu K I. Stepwise production of CO-RICH syngas and hydrogen via solar methane reforming by using a Ni(II)-ferrite redox system. Solar Energy, 2002, 73(5): 363–374
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Krenzke P T, Davidson J H. Thermodynamic analysis of syngas production via the solar thermochemical cerium oxide redox cycle with methane-driven reduction. Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(6): 4088–4095
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Abanades S, Chambon M. CO2 dissociation and upgrading from two-step solar thermochemical processes based on ZnO/Zn and SnO2/SnO redox pairs. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24(12): 6667–6674
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Marxer D A, Furler P, Scheffe J R, Geerlings H, Falter C, Batteiger V, Sizmann A, Steinfeld A. Demonstration of the entire production chain to renewable kerosene via solar thermochemical splitting of H2O and CO2. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(5): 3241–3250
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Hao Y, Yang C K, Haile S M. High-temperature isothermal chemical cycling for solar-driven fuel production. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2013, 15(40): 17084–17092
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Roine A. Outokumpu HSC Chemistry for Windows, Version 7.1. Pori, Finland: Outokumpu Research Oy, 2013
[24]
Bhosale R R, Kumar A, Almomani F, Ghosh U, Dardor D, Bouabidi Z, Ali M, Yousefi S, AlNouss A, Anis M S, Usmani M H, Ali M H, Azzam R S, Banu A. Solar co-production of samarium and syngas via methanothermal reduction of samarium sesquioxide. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 112: 413–422
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Steinfeld A, Larson C, Palumbo R, Foley M III. Thermodynamic analysis of the co-production of zinc and synthesis gas using solar process heat. Energy, 1996, 21(3): 205–222
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Krenzke P T, Fosheim J R, Davidson J H. Solar fuels via chemical-looping reforming. Solar Energy, 2017, 156: 48–72
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Bhosale R R, Kumar A, Sutar P. Thermodynamic analysis of solar driven SnO2 /SnO based thermochemical water splitting cycle. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 135: 226–235
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Marxer D, Furler P, Takacs M, Steinfeld A. Solar thermochemical splitting of CO2 into separate streams of CO and O2 with high selectivity, stability, conversion, and efficiency. Energy & Environmental Science, 2017, 10(5): 1142–1149
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Bader R, Venstrom L J, Davidson J H, Lipiński W. Thermodynamic analysis of isothermal redox cycling of ceria for solar fuel production. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(9): 5533–5544
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Ermanoski I, Miller J E, Allendorf M D. Efficiency maximization in solar-thermochemical fuel production: challenging the concept of isothermal water splitting. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2014, 16(18): 8418–8427
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Innovation Practice Training Program of College Students, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Application No. 20184000028), the Practical Training Program of Beijing University of Higher Education High-level Talents Cross-cultivation (No. 16053225), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51476163, 51806209 and 81801768).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1537 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/