Please wait a minute...

Frontiers in Energy

Front. Energy    2020, Vol. 14 Issue (3) : 570-577     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-019-0642-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A novel cryogenic insulation system of hollow glass microspheres and self-evaporation vapor-cooled shield for liquid hydrogen storage
Jianpeng ZHENG1, Liubiao CHEN2(), Ping WANG3, Jingjie ZHANG3, Junjie WANG1(), Yuan ZHOU1
1. Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Cryogenics, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2. Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Cryogenics, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Beijing 100190, China
3. Chinese Academy of Sciences State Key Laboratory of Technologies in Space Cryogenic Propellants, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Beijing 100190, China
Download: PDF(1279 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Liquid hydrogen (LH2) attracts widespread attention because of its highest energy storage density. However, evaporation loss is a serious problem in LH2 storage due to the low boiling point (20 K). Efficient insulation technology is an important issue in the study of LH2 storage. Hollow glass microspheres (HGMs) is a potential promising thermal insulation material because of its low apparent thermal conductivity, fast installation (Compared with multi-layer insulation, it can be injected in a short time.), and easy maintenance. A novel cryogenic insulation system consisting of HGMs and a self-evaporating vapor-cooled shield (VCS) is proposed for storage of LH2. A thermodynamic model has been established to analyze the coupled heat transfer characteristics of HGMs and VCS in the composite insulation system. The results show that the combination of HGMs and VCS can effectively reduce heat flux into the LH2 tank. With the increase of VCS number from 1 to 3, the minimum heat flux through HGMs decreases by 57.36%, 65.29%, and 68.21%, respectively. Another significant advantage of HGMs is that their thermal insulation properties are not sensitive to ambient vacuum change. When ambient vacuum rises from 103 Pa to 1 Pa, the heat flux into the LH2 tank increases by approximately 20%. When the vacuum rises from 103 Pa to 100 Pa, the combination of VCS and HGMs reduces the heat flux into the tank by 58.08%–69.84% compared with pure HGMs.

Keywords liquid hydrogen storage      hollow glass microspheres (HGMs)      self-evaporation vapor-cooled shield (VCS)      thermodynamic optimization     
Corresponding Author(s): Liubiao CHEN,Junjie WANG   
Online First Date: 30 August 2019    Issue Date: 14 September 2020
 Cite this article:   
Jianpeng ZHENG,Liubiao CHEN,Ping WANG, et al. A novel cryogenic insulation system of hollow glass microspheres and self-evaporation vapor-cooled shield for liquid hydrogen storage[J]. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(3): 570-577.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/10.1007/s11708-019-0642-y
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/Y2020/V14/I3/570
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Jianpeng ZHENG
Liubiao CHEN
Ping WANG
Jingjie ZHANG
Junjie WANG
Yuan ZHOU
Fig.1  Schematic of the proposed novel composite insulation system.
Fig.2  Heat transfer flowchart of the proposed novel composite insulation system.
Fig.3  Heat flux through HGMs with one VCS.
Fig.4  Position optimization in HGMs with one VCS.
Fig.5  Optimized insulation performance of HGMs with different VCSs.
Fig.6  Insulation performance of HGMs with different thickness.
Fig.7  Temperature profile through HGMs under different conditions.
Fig.8  Insulation performance at different hot boundary temperatures.
Fig.9  Thermal properties of LH2 at different pressures.
Fig.10  Insulation performance at different LH2 pressures.
Fig.11  Insulation performance of the LH2 tank at different volumes.
Fig.12  Insulation performance of HGMs at different vacuum degrees.
HGMs Heat flux into tank/(W?m2)
0.001 Pa 0.01 Pa 0.1 Pa 1 Pa 10 Pa 100 Pa
Without VCS 0.896 0.897 0.973 1.078 2.384 6.796
1 VCS 0.376 0.376 0.408 0.452 1.000 2.849
2 VCSs 0.308 0.308 0.334 0.370 0.818 2.333
3 VCSs 0.285 0.285 0.309 0.343 0.758 2.160
Tab.1  Heat flux into LH2 tank at different vacuum degrees
1 X H Yan, X Zhang, C H Gu, F Li. Power to gas: addressing renewable curtailment by converting to hydrogen. Frontiers in Energy, 2018, 12(4): 560–568
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-018-0588-5
2 A Khosravi, R N N Koury, L Machado, J J G Pabon. Energy, exergy and economic analysis of a hybrid renewable energy with hydrogen storage system. Energy, 2018, 148: 1087–1102
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.008
3 A Mostafaeipour, M Qolipour, H Goudarzi. Feasibility of using wind turbines for renewable hydrogen production in Firuzkuh, Iran. Frontiers in Energy, 2018: 1–12
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-018-0588-5
4 V L Pachapur, S J Sarma, S K Brar, Y L Bihan, G Buelna, M Verma . Energy balance of hydrogen production from wastes of biodiesel production. Biofuels, 2018, 9(2): 129–138
https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2016.1153361
5 X P Chen, W F Shangguan. Hydrogen production from water splitting on CdS-based photocatalysts using solar light. Frontiers in Energy, 2013, 7(1): 111–118
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-012-0228-4
6 A Ozarslan. Large-scale hydrogen energy storage in salt caverns. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(19): 14265–14277
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.111
7 A M Abdalla, S Hossain, P M Petra, M Ghasemi, A K. AzadAchievements and trends of solid oxide fuel cells in clean energy field: a perspective review. Frontiers in Energy, 2018: 1–24
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-018-0546-2
8 L J Hastings, A Hedayat, T M Brown. Analytical modeling and test correlation of variable density multilayer insulation for cryogenic storage. Technical Report, NASA/TM-2004-213175, 2004
9 J J Martin, L Hastings. Large-scale liquid hydrogen testing of variable density multilayer insulation with a foam substrate. Technical Report, NASA/TM-2001–211089, 2001
10 C J Tseng, M Yamaguchi, T Ohmori. Thermal conductivity of polyurethane foams from room temperature to 20 K. Cryogenics, 1997, 37(6): 305–312
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-2275(97)00023-4
11 Z Liu, Y Z Li, F S Xie, K Zhou. Thermal performance of foam/MLI for cryogenic liquid hydrogen tank during the ascent and on orbit period. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 98(5): 430–439
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.12.084
12 Q Wang, J Chen, B Q Gui, T Zhai, D Yang. Fabrication and properties of thermal insulating material using hollow glass microspheres bonded by aluminum-chrome-phosphate and tetraethyl orthosilicate. Ceramics International, 2016, 42(4): 4886–4892
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.12.003
13 J E Fesmire, J P Sass. Aerogel insulation applications for liquid hydrogen launch vehicle tanks. Cryogenics, 2008, 48(5–6): 223–231
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2008.03.014
14 J S Zhang, T S Fisher, P V Ramachandran, J P Gore, I Mudawar. A review of heat transfer issues in hydrogen storage technologies. Journal of Heat Transfer, 2005, 127(12): 1391–1399
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2098875
15 F Wang, J S Liang, Q G Tang, N Wang, L W Li. Preparation and properties of thermal insulation latex paint for exterior wall based on defibred sepiolite and hollow glass microspheres. Advanced Materials Research, 2009, 58: 103–108
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.58.103
16 C D Li, B H Li, N Pan, Z Chen, M U Saeed, T Xu, Y Yang. Thermo-physical properties of polyester fiber reinforced fumed silica/hollow glass microsphere composite core and resulted vacuum insulation panel. Energy and Building, 2016, 125: 298–309
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.013
17 K Q Yan, P Wang, J J Zhang. Progress in the cryogenic insulation of hollow glass microspheres. Vacuum and Cryogenics, 2016, 22(2): 63–69
18 J P Sass, W W S Cyr, T M Barrett, R G Baumgartner, J W Lott, J E Fesmire, J G Weisend. Glass bubbles insulation for liquid hydrogen storage tanks. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2010, 1218: 772–779
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3422430
19 P Wang, B Liao, Z G An, K Yan, J Zhang. Measurement and calculation of cryogenic thermal conductivity of HGMs. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 129: 591–598
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.09.113
20 M S Allen, R G Baumgartner, J E Fesmire, S D. AugustynowiczAdvances in microsphere insulation systems. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2004, 710: 619–626
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1774735
21 J Yuan, Z An, B Li, J Zhang. Facile aqueous synthesis and thermal insulating properties of low-density glass/TiO2 core/shell composite hollow spheres. Particuology, 2012, 10(4): 475–479
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2011.08.005
22 J P Zheng, L B Chen, J Wang, Y Zhou, J Wang. Thermodynamic modelling and optimization of self-evaporation vapor cooled shield for liquid hydrogen storage tank. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 184: 74–82
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.053
23 W B Jiang, Z Q Zuo, Y H Huang, B Wang, P J Sun, P Li. Coupling optimization of composite insulation and vapor-cooled shield for on-orbit cryogenic storage tank. Cryogenics, 2018, 96: 90–98
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.10.008
24 R E Skochdopole. The thermal conductivity of foamed plastics. Chemical Engineering Progress, 1961, 57(10): 55–59
25 P Wang. Research and application of vacuum thermal insulation performance of hollow glass microspheres. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018 (in Chinese)
26 K C Yung, B L Zhu, T M Yue, C Xie. Preparation and properties of hollow glass microsphere-filled epoxy-matrix composites. Composites Science and Technology, 2009, 69(2): 260–264
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.014
27 J E Fesmire, S D Augustynowicz. Thermal performance testing of glass microspheres under cryogenic vacuum conditions. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2004, 710(1): 612–618
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1774734
28 G R Cunnington, C L Tien. Apparent thermal conductivity of uncoated microsphere cryogenic insulation. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, 1977, 22: 263–271
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9850-9_28
29 Q Zhu, H Lee, Z M Zhang. Radiative properties of materials with surface scattering or volume scattering: a review. Frontiers of Energy and Power Engineering in China, 2009, 3(1): 60–79
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-009-0011-3
30 L Schlapbach, A Züttel. Hydrogen-storage materials for mobile applications. Nature, 2001, 414(6861): 353–358
https://doi.org/10.1038/35104634
31 J P Zheng, L B Chen, J Wang, X Xi, H Zhu, Y Zhou, J Wang. Thermodynamic analysis and comparison of four insulation schemes for liquid hydrogen storage tank. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 186: 526–534
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.073
32 J L Yang, J B Tang. Influence of envelope insulation materials on building energy consumption. Frontiers in Energy, 2017, 11(4): 575–581
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-017-0473-7
33 C L Lim, N M Adam, K A Ahmad. Cryogenic pipe flow simulation for liquid nitrogen with vacuum insulated pipe (VIP) and Polyurethane (PU) foam insulation under steady-state conditions. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 2018, 7: 302–310
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2018.07.009
34 J P Zheng, L B Chen, C Cui, J Guo, W Zhu, Y Zhou, J Wang. Experimental study on composite insulation system of spray on foam insulation and variable density multilayer insulation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 130: 161–168
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.11.050
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed