Geometric optimization model for the solar cavity receiver with helical pipe at different solar radiation

Abstract

In consideration of geometric parameters, several researches have already optimized the thermal efficiency of the cylindrical cavity receiver. However, most of the optimal results have been achieved at a fixed solar radiation. At different direct normal irradiance (DNI), any single optimal result may not be suitable enough for different regions over the world. This study constructed a 3-D numerical model of cylindrical cavity receiver with DNI variation. In the model of a cylindrical cavity receiver containing a helical pipe, the heat losses of the cavity and heat transfer of working medium were also taken into account. The simulation results show that for a particular DNI in the range of 400 W/m² to 800 W/m², there exists a best design for achieving a highest thermal efficiency of the cavity receiver. Besides, for a receiver in constant geometric parameters, the total heat losses increases dramatically with the DNI increasing in that range, as well as the temperature of the working medium. The thermal efficiency presented a different variation tendency with the heat losses, which is 2.45% as a minimum decline. In summary, this paper proposed an optimization method in the form of a bunch of fitting curves which could be applied to receiver design in different DNI regions, with comparatively appropriate thermal performances.

Keywords

cylindrical cavity receiver / 3-D numerical simulation / geometric optimization / direct normal irradiation

References

[1] Wu S Y, Xiao L, Li Y R. Effect of aperture position and size on natural convection heat loss of a solar heat-pipe receiver. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2011, 31(14–15): 2787–2796

[2] Wu W, Amsbeck L, Buck R, Waibel N, Langner P, Pitz-Paal R. On the influence of rotation on thermal convection in a rotating cavity for solar receiver applications. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 70(1): 694–704

[3] Reddy K S, Sendhil Kumar N. Combined laminar natural convection and surface radiation heat transfer in a modified cavity receiver of solar parabolic dish. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2008, 47(12): 1647–1657

[4] Reddy K S, Sendhil Kumar N. An improved model for natural convection heat loss from modified cavity receiver of solar dish concentrator. Solar Energy, 2009, 83(10): 1884–1892

[5] Reddy K S, Vikram T S, Veershetty G. Combined heat loss analysis of solar parabolic dish-modified cavity receiver for superheated steam generation. Solar Energy, 2015, 121: 78–93

[6] Sendhil Kumar N, Reddy K S. Numerical investigation of natural convection heat loss in modified cavity receiver for fuzzy focal solar dish concentrator. Solar Energy, 2007, 81(7): 846–855

[7] Reddy K S, Veershetty G, Srihari Vikram T. Effect of wind speed and direction on convective heat losses from solar parabolic dish modified cavity receiver. Solar Energy, 2016, 131: 183–198

[8] Flesch R, Stadler H, Uhlig R, Hoffschmidt B. On the influence of wind on cavity receivers for solar power towers: an experimental analysis. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 87: 724–735

[9] Stadler H, Flesch R, Maldonado D. On the influence of wind on cavity receivers for solar power towers: flow visualisation by means of background oriented schlieren imaging. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 113: 1381–1385

[10] Ngo L C, Bello-Ochende T, Meyer J P. Three-dimensional analysis and numerical optimization of combined natural convection and radiation heat loss in solar cavity receiver with plate fins insert. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 101: 757–766

[11] Ngo L C, Bello-Ochende T, Meyer J P. Numerical modelling and optimisation of natural convection heat loss suppression in a solar cavity receiver with plate fins. Renewable Energy, 2015, 74: 95–105

[12] Wang P, Li J B, Bai F W, Liu D Y, Xu C, Zhao L, Wang Z F. Experimental and theoretical evaluation on the thermal performance of a windowed volumetric solar receiver. Energy, 2017, 119: 652–661

[13] Xu G, Wang Y, Quan Y, Li H, Li S, Song G, Gao W. Design and characteristics of a novel tapered tube bundle receiver for high-temperature solar dish system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 91: 791–799

[14] Przenzak E, Szubel M, Filipowicz M. The numerical model of the high temperature receiver for concentrated solar radiation. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 125: 97–106

[15] Daabo A M, Mahmoud S, Al-Dadah R K. The effect of receiver geometry on the optical performance of a small-scale solar cavity receiver for parabolic dish applications. Energy, 2016, 114: 513–525

[16] Daabo A M, Al Jubori A, Mahmoud S, Al-Dadah R K. Parametric study of efficient small-scale axial and radial turbines for solar powered Brayton cycle application. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 128: 343–360

[17] Qiu K, Yan L, Ni M, Wang C, Xiao G, Luo Z, Cen K. Simulation and experimental study of an air tube-cavity solar receiver. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 103: 847–858

[18] Huang W, Huang F, Hu P, Chen Z. Prediction and optimization of the performance of parabolic solar dish concentrator with sphere receiver using analytical function. Renewable Energy, 2013, 53: 18–26

[19] Cheng Z D, He Y L, Cui F Q. A new modelling method and unified code with MCRT for concentrating solar collectors and its applications. Applied Energy, 2013, 101: 686–698

[20] Loni R, Kasaeian A B, Mahian O, Sahin A Z. Thermodynamic analysis of an organic rankine cycle using a tubular solar cavity receiver. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 127: 494–503

[21] Qiu K, Yan L, Ni M, Wang C, Xiao G, Luo Z, Cen K. Simulation and experimental study of an air tube-cavity solar receiver. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 103: 847–858

[22] Zou C, Zhang Y, Feng H, Falcoz Q, Neveu P, Gao W, Zhang C. Effects of geometric parameters on thermal performance for a cylindrical solar receiver using a 3D numerical model. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 149(Suppl. C): 293–302

[23] Sun L, Yan W. Prediction of wall temperature and oxide scale thickness of ferritic–martensitic steel superheater tubes. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 134: 171–181

[24] Li L, Sun J, Li Y. Thermal load and bending analysis of heat collection element of direct-steam-generation parabolic-trough solar power plant. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 127: 1530–1542

[25] Li L, Sun J, Li Y. Prospective fully-coupled multi-level analytical methodology for concentrated solar power plants: general modelling. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 118: 171–187

[26] Gießing C, Neber T, Thiel C M. Genetic variation in nicotinic receptors affects brain networks involved in reorienting attention. NeuroImage, 2012, 59(1): 831–839

[27] Sendhil Kumar N, Reddy K S. Comparison of receivers for solar dish collector system. Energy Conversion and Management, 2008, 49(4): 812–819

[28] Wu S Y, Guo F H, Xiao L. Numerical investigation on combined natural convection and radiation heat losses in one side open cylindrical cavity with constant heat flux. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2014, 71(Suppl. C): 573–584

[29] Flesch R, Stadler H, Uhlig R, Pitz-Paal R. Numerical analysis of the influence of inclination angle and wind on the heat losses of cavity receivers for solar thermal power towers. Solar Energy, 2014, 110: 427–437

[30] Tu N, Wei J, Fang J. Numerical investigation on uniformity of heat flux for semi-gray surfaces inside a solar cavity receiver. Solar Energy, 2015, 112(Suppl. C): 128–143

[31] Hogan R E Jr. AEETES—a solar reflux receiver thermal performance numerical model. Solar Energy, 1994, 52(2): 167–178

[32] Garg V K. Applied computational Fluid Dynamics. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1998

[33] Shen Z G, Wu S Y, Xiao L. Numerical study of wind effects on combined convective heat loss from an upward-facing cylindrical cavity. Solar Energy, 2016, 132: 294–309

[34] Xiao L, Wu S Y, Li Y R. Numerical study on combined free-forced convection heat loss of solar cavity receiver under wind environments. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2012, 60: 182–194

[35] Irvine T F, Liley P E. Steam and Gas Tables with Computer Equations. Orlando: Academic Press, 1984

[36] Zou C, Zhang Y, Falcoz Q, Neveu P, Zhang C, Shu W, Huang S. Design and optimization of a high-temperature cavity receiver for a solar energy cascade utilization system. Renewable Energy, 2017, 103: 478–489

[37] Xiao G, Yang T, Ni D, Cen K, Ni M. A model-based approach for optical performance assessment and optimization of a solar dish. Renewable Energy, 2017, 100: 103–113

[38] Brownson J R S, Gardner D, Nieto A. Solar resource-reserve classification and flow-based economic analysis. Solar Energy, 2015, 116: 45–55

[39] Stökler S, Schillings C, Kraas B. Solar resource assessment study for Pakistan. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 58: 1184–1188

[40] Moreno-Tejera S, Silva-Pérez M A, Lillo-Bravo I, Ramírez-Santigosa L. Solar resource assessment in Seville, Spain. Statistical characterisation of solar radiation at different time resolutions. Solar Energy, 2016, 132: 430–441

[41] Polo J, Téllez F M, Tapia C. Comparative analysis of long-term solar resource and CSP production for bankability. Renewable Energy, 2016, 90: 38–45

[42] Zeng K, Gauthier D, Soria J, Mazza G, Flamant G. Solar pyrolysis of carbonaceous feedstocks: a review. Solar Energy, 2017, 156: 73–92

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the National Program of International Science and Technology Cooperation of China (Grant No. 2014DFA60990).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature