Usability perceptions and beliefs about smart thermostats by chi-square test, signal detection theory, and fuzzy detection theory in regions of Mexico

Pedro PONCE, Therese PEFFER, Arturo MOLINA

PDF(439 KB)
PDF(439 KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) : 522-538. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-018-0562-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Usability perceptions and beliefs about smart thermostats by chi-square test, signal detection theory, and fuzzy detection theory in regions of Mexico

Author information +
History +

Abstract

It is well known that smart thermostats (STs) have become key devices in the implementation of smart homes; thus, they are considered as primary elements for the control of electrical energy consumption in households. Moreover, energy consumption is drastically affected when the end users select unsuitable STs or when they do not use the STs correctly. Furthermore, in future, Mexico will face serious electrical energy challenges that can be considerably resolved if the end users operate the STs in a correct manner. Hence, it is important to carry out an in-depth study and analysis on thermostats, by focusing on social aspects that influence the technological use and performance of the thermostats. This paper proposes the use of a signal detection theory (SDT), fuzzy detection theory (FDT), and chi-square (CS) test in order to understand the perceptions and beliefs of end users about the use of STs in Mexico. This paper extensively shows the perceptions and beliefs about the selected thermostats in Mexico. Besides, it presents an in-depth discussion on the cognitive perceptions and beliefs of end users. Moreover, it shows why the expectations of the end users about STs are not met. It also promotes the technological and social development of STs such that they are relatively more accepted in complex electrical grids such as smart grids.

Keywords

thermostats / perceptions / beliefs / signal detection theory (SDT) / fuzzy signal detection theory (FSDT) / chi-square (CS) test

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Pedro PONCE, Therese PEFFER, Arturo MOLINA. Usability perceptions and beliefs about smart thermostats by chi-square test, signal detection theory, and fuzzy detection theory in regions of Mexico. Front. Energy, 2019, 13(3): 522‒538 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-018-0562-2

References

[1]
Darby S. Smart metering: what potential for householder engagement? Building Research and Information, 2010, 38(5): 442–457
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Peffer T, Pritoni M, Meier A, Aragon C, Perry D. How people use thermostats in homes: a review. Building and Environment, 2011, 46(12): 2529–2541
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Rosas J, Sheinbaum C, Morillon D. The structure of household energy consumption and related CO2 emissions by income group in Mexico. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2010, 14(2): 127–133
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Turber S, vom Brocke J, Gassmann O, Fleisch E. Designing business models in the era of internet of things. In: Tremblay M C, VanderMeer D, Rothenberger M, Gupta A, Yoon V (eds), Advancing the Impact of Design Science: Moving from Theory to Practice. DESRIST 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8463. Springer, Cham
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Pritoni M, Woolley J, Modera M P. Do occupancy-responsive learning thermostats save energy? A field study in university residence halls. Energy and Buildings, 2016, 127: 469–478
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Meier A, Aragon C, Peffer T, Perry D, Pritoni M. Usability of residential thermostats: preliminary investigations. Building and Environment, 2011, 46(10): 1891–1898
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
ENERGY.GOV. Energy saver: setting your thermostats for comfort and saving. 2016–09, available at energy.gov website
[8]
Kleiminger W, Mattern F, Santini S. Predicting household occupancy for smart heating control: a comparative performance analysis of state-of-the-art approaches. Energy and Building, 2014, 85: 493–505
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Keshtkar A, Arzanpour S, Keshtkar F, Ahmadi P. Smart residential load reduction via fuzzy logic, wireless sensors, and smart grid incentives. Energy and Building, 2015, 104: 165–180
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Mahmood A, Javaid N, Razzaq S. A review of wireless communications for smart grid. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 41: 248–260
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Shipworth M. Thermostat settings in English houses: no evidence of change between 1984 and 2007. Building and Environment, 2011, 46(3): 635–642
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Maarten W. The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: renewable as common pool resources. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 6(1): 822–835
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Assefa G, Frostell B. Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: a case study of energy technologies. Technology in Society, 2007, 29(1): 6–78
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Uncles R. What will lead to product acceptance and growing sales? In: Medical Equipment Industry-Potential for Growth Conference, 1998, 79–84
[15]
Ponce P, Polasko K, Molina A. Technology transfer motivation analysis based on fuzzy type-2 signal detection theory. AI & Society, 2016, 31(2): 245–257
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
McNicol D. A Primer of Signal Detection Theory. Hove: Psychology Press, 2005
[17]
Prasad S, Bruce L M. Limitations of principal components analysis for hyperspectral target recognition. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2008, 5(4): 625–629
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Pritoni M, Meier A K, Aragon C, Perry D, Peffer T. Energy efficiency and the misuse of programmable thermostats: the effectiveness of crowdsourcing for understanding household behavior. Energy Research & Social Science, 2015, 8: 190–197
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Cericola R.10 smart home apps that make you want the Apple Watch. 2015, available at electronichouse.com website
[20]
Hamdi M, Lachiver G. A fuzzy control system based on the human sensation of thermal comfort. In: IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems Proceedings, Anchorage, AK, USA, 1998
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Meyer J R, Uhrich D T. U.S. Patent No. 6101824, 2000
[22]
Boone R G, Gordon J, Barnes F, Fraser-Beekman S. Factors impacting innovation in a product development organization. In: IEEE International Conference on in Electro/Information Techno-logy (EIT), Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2012
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Karjalainen S. Gender differences in thermal comfort and use of thermostats in everyday thermal environments. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(4): 1594–1603
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Moon J W, Han S H. Thermostat strategies impact on energy consumption in residential buildings. Energy and Building, 2011, 43(2): 338–346
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Nielsen J, Landauer T K. A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Proceedings of the INTERACT’93 and CHI’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993, 206–213
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Nielsen J. Why you only need to test with 5 users: alertbox. 2016–10, available at nngroup.com website
[27]
Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. London: Elsevier, 1994
[28]
Faulkner L. Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 2003, 35(3): 379–383
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
Salvendy G, Lewis J R. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. London: Wiley, 2006
[30]
Mantel N. Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom; extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1963, 58(303): 690–700
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Conci M, Pianesi F, Zancanaro M. Useful, social and enjoyable: Mobile phone adoption by older people. In: INTERACT’09 Proceedings of the 12th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Part I, 2009, 63–76
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
National Institute of Statistic and Geography. Población (statistical information about population in Mexico). 2017–09, available at beta.inegi.org.mx website
[33]
National Institute of Statistic and Geography. “Estadísticas a propósito del… día mundial de internet (17 de mayo)”datos nacionales (statistical information about technology Mexico). 2017–09, available at inegi.org.mx website
[34]
Campbell S W. Perceptions of mobile phones in college classrooms: ringing, cheating, and classroom policies. Communication Education, 2006, 55(3): 280–294
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
White M P, Eiser J R, Harris P R. Risk perceptions of mobile phone use while driving. Risk Analysis, 2004, 24(2): 323–334
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[36]
Macmillan N A. Signal detection theory. In: Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology. London: Wiley, 2002
[37]
Parasuraman R, Masalonis A J, Hancock P A. Fuzzy signal detection theory: basic postulates and formulas for analyzing human and machine performance. Human Factors, 2000, 42(4): 636–659
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[38]
Lancaster H O, Seneta E. Chi-square Distribution. London: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1969
[39]
Özdemir T, Eyduran E. Comparison of chi-square and likelihood ratio chi-square tests: power of test. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2005, 1(2): 242–244
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Lancaster H O, Seneta E. Chi-square Distribution. London: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2005
[41]
Franke T M, Ho T, Christie C A. The chi-square test often used and more often misinterpreted. American Journal of Evaluation, 2012, 33(3): 448–458
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Swets J A. Signal Detection and Recognition by Human Observers.New York: Wiley, 1964
[43]
Peterson W W, Birdsall T G, Fox W C. The theory of signal detectability. Proceedings of the IRE Professional Group on Information Theory, 1954, 4: 171–212
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Marcum J I. A statistical theory of target detection by pulsed radar. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 1960, 6(2): 259–267
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Paredes-Olay C, Moreno-Fernández M M, Rosas J M, Ramos-Álvarez M M. ROC analysis in olive oil tasting: a signal detection theory approach to tasting tasks. Food Quality and Preference, 2010, 21(5): 562–568
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Green D M, Swets J A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics.New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1966
[47]
Macmillan N A, Douglas C C. Response bias: characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and “nonparametric” indexes. Psychological Bulletin, 1990, 107(3): 401–413
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Snodgrass J G, Corwin J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1988, 117(1): 34–50
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[49]
Masalonis A, Parasuraman R. Fuzzy signal detection theory: analysis of human and machine performance in air traffic control, and analytic considerations. Ergonomics, 2003, 46(11): 1045–1074
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Parasuraman R, Masalonis A J, Hancock P A. Fuzzy signal detection theory: basic postulates and formulas for analyzing human and machine performance. Human Factors, 2000, 42(4): 636–659
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[51]
Baptiste P, Trépanier S, Pireaux S, Quessy S. Difficulties connected to the integration of resource management in operations management. Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés, 2004, 38: 773–795 (in French)
[52]
Brownson J R S. Chapter 11–The Sun as Commons. In: Solar Energy Conversion Systems. Elsevier Inc., 2014, 287–305
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Peffer T, Pritoni M, Meier A, Aragon C, Perry D. How people use thermostats in homes: a review. Building and Environment, 2011, 46(12): 2529–2541
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Fideicomiso para el Ahorro de Energía Eléctrica. Educación para el Ahorroy Uso Racional de la Energía Eléctrica Educaree. 2016–09, available at fide.org.mx website

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by “Bi-national laboratory for the intelligent management of energy sustainability and technological education” (Grant No. 266632) from CONACYT-SENER, Tecnologico de Monterrey, and UC Berkeley.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(439 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/