Experimental study on performance of passive and active solar stills in Indian coastal climatic condition

Abstract

This present work is aimed to examine the effect of mass flow rate on distillate output and performance of a solar still in active mode. Outdoor experiments were conducted at the coastal town, Kakinada (16°93′N/83°33′E), Andhra Pradesh, India. A solar still with a 30° of fixed cover inclination, 1m² of effective basin area, and a flat-plate collector (FPC) with an effective area of 2 m² were used. An attempt was also made earlier in passive mode to optimize the water depth for the same solar still for maximum yield and distillation efficiency. For the passive still, it is observed that the capacity of heat storage and heat drop are significant parameters that affect the still performance. For the selected still design, the study reveals that 0.04 m water depth is the optimum value for specific climatic conditions. In the active solar still, with the optimum water depth, different flow rates of 0.5, 1 and 1.5 L/min are considered through FPC. It is observed that both the mass flow rate and the variation of internal heat transfer coefficients with the mass flow rate have a significant effect on the yield and performance of the still. The experimental results show that the combination of 1.5 L/min mass flow rate and an optimum water depth of 0.04 m leads to a maximum yield for the active solar still. The enhanced yield of the active solar still is 57.55%, compared with that of the passive solar still, due to increase in area of radiation collection and more heat absorption rate.

Keywords

distillation efficiency / solar still / heat transfer coefficient / water depth / optimum and mass flow rate

References

[1] Dunkle R V. Solar water distillation, the roof type still and a multiple effect diffusion still, international developments in heat transfer. In: Proceedings of ASME International Heat Transfer Conference, Part 5, University of Colorado, 1961, 895–902

[2] Kumar S, Tiwari G N. Estimation of convective mass transfer in solar distillation system. Solar Energy, 1996, 57(6): 459–464

[3] Rajamanickam M R, Ragupathy A. Influence of water depth on internal heat and mass transfer in a double slope solar still. Energy Procedia, 2012, 14: 1701–1708

[4] Rai S N, Tiwari G N. Single basin solar still coupled with flat plate collector. Energy Conversion and Management, 1983, 23(3): 145–149

[5] Singh H N, Tiwari G N. Monthly performance of passive and active solar stills for different Indian climatic conditions. Desalination, 2004, 168(1–3): 145–150

[6] Dwivedi V K, Tiwari G N. Experimental validation of thermal model of a double slope active solar still under natural circulation mode. Desalination, 2010, 250(1): 49–55

[7] Feilizadeh M, Estahbanati M R K, Ahsan A, Jafarpur K, Mersaghian A. Effects of water and basin depths in single basin solar stills: an experimental and theoretical study. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 122: 174–181

[8] Taghvaei H, Taghvaei H, Jafarpur K, Feilizadeh M, Karimi Estahbanati M R. Experimental investigation of the effect of solar collecting area on the performance of active solar stills with different brine depths. Desalination, 2015, 358: 76–83

[9] Taghvaei H, Taghvaei H, Jafarpur K, Estahbanati M R K, Feilizadeh M. A thorough investigation of the effects of water depth on the performance of active solar stills. Desalination, 2014, 347: 77–85

[10] Bhardwaj R, ten Kortenaar M V, Mudde R F. Maximized production of water by increasing area of condensation surface for solar distillation. Applied Energy, 2015, 154: 480–490

[11] Dev R, Abdul-wahab S A, Tiwari G N. Performance study of the inverted absorber solar still with water depth and total dissolved solid. Applied Energy, 2011, 88(1): 252–264

[12] Ahsan A, Imteaz M, Thomas U A, Azmi M, Rahman A, Nik Daud N N. Parameters affecting the performance of a low cost solar still. Applied Energy, 2014, 114(2): 924–930

[13] Tripathi R, Tiwari G N. Thermal modeling of passive and active solar stills for different depths of water by using the concept of solar fraction. Solar Energy, 2006, 80(8): 956–967

[14] Elango T, Kalidasa Murugavel K. The effect of the water depth on the productivity for single and double basin double slope glass solar stills. Desalination, 2015, 359: 82–91

[15] Somanchi N S, Sagi S L S, Kumar T A, Kakarlamudi S P D, Parik A. Modelling and analysis of single slope solar still at different water depth. Aquatic Procedia, 2015, 4: 1477–1482

[16] Durkaieswaran P, Kailas Murugavel K. Various special designs of single basin passive solar still—a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 49: 1048–1060

[17] Tabrizi F F, Dashtban M, Moghaddam H, Razzaghi K. Effect of water flow rate on internal heat and mass transfer and daily productivity of a weir-type cascade solar still. Desalination, 2010, 260(1–3): 239–247

[18] Panchal H N, Patel M I, Patel B, Goswami R, Doshi M. A comparatıve analysıs of sıngle slope solar stıll coupled wıth flat plate collector and passıve solar. IJRRAS, 2011, 7: 111–116

[19] Kumar S, Dubey A, Tiwari G N. A solar still augmented with an evacuated tube collector in forced mode. Desalination, 2014, 347: 15–24

[20] Panchal H N. Performance analysis of solar still with cow dung cakes and blue metal stones. Frontiers in Energy, 2015, 9(2): 180–186

[21] Panchal H N, Shah P K. Enhancement of distillate output of double basin solar still with vacuum tubes. Frontiers in Energy, 2014, 8(1): 101–109

[22] Singh R V, Kumar S, Hasan M M, Khan M E, Tiwari G N. Performance of a solar still integrated with evacuated tube collector in natural mode. Desalination, 2013, 318: 25–33

[23] El-Agouz S A, El-Samadony Y A F, Kabeel A E. Performance evaluation of a continuous flow inclined solar still desalination system. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 101: 606–615

[24] Sathyamurthy R, El-Agouz S A, Nagarajan P K, Subramani J, Arunkumar T, Mageshbabu D, Madhu B, Bharathwaaj R, Prakash N. A review of integrating solar collectors to solar still. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 77: 1069–1097

[25] Panchal H N, Shah P K. Effect of varying glass cover thickness on performance of solar still: in a winter climate conditions. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 2011, 1(4): 212–223

[26] Nakra B C. Instrumentation Measurement and Analysis. New Delhi: Tata Mc Graw-Hill, 1985

Acknowledgments

The authors are very thankful to JNTUK, Kakinada, for providing the experimental facilities. Distinct thanks are extended to Dr. S. Ramesh Babu, and Dr T.V.V. Sudhakar of SCET, Narasapur, India for their cooperation at every stage of my research work.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature