How Prevalence Influences the Interpretation of Lyme Disease Test Results in a High-Incidence State (Wisconsin) Versus a Low-Incidence State (Arkansas)

Dirk Haselow , Aaron Wendelboe

Zoonoses ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 31

PDF (392KB)
Zoonoses ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) :31 DOI: 10.15212/ZOONOSES-2025-0016
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
research-article
How Prevalence Influences the Interpretation of Lyme Disease Test Results in a High-Incidence State (Wisconsin) Versus a Low-Incidence State (Arkansas)
Author information +
History +
PDF (392KB)

Abstract

Objective: Clinicians’ understanding of prevalence is key in diagnostic test interpretation. In high-prevalence scenarios, the post-test probability of a positive test result can approach 100%, whereas in low-prevalence situations, the post-test probability might only slightly exceed the initial low pre-test probability. Herein, we present an example of this issue in the context of interpreting Lyme disease test results in high- versus low-incidence states.

Methods: We present a thought experiment demonstrating the effects of prevalence on the interpretation of early Lyme disease serologic testing.

Results: A positive test result was found to be more than 30 times more likely to be a false positive than a true positive in Arkansas.

Conclusions: In locations with low Lyme disease incidence, efforts might be better spent on thoroughly working up alternative diagnoses before considering testing for Lyme disease. Furthermore, we suggest that clinicians in low-incidence states in the southern U.S. consider waiting before treating patients empirically with antibiotics for clinical scenarios consistent with early Lyme disease, because southern tick-associated rash illness in the southern U.S. commonly mimics the classic erythema migrans rash associated with Lyme disease, but is mild and self-limiting.

Keywords

Lyme disease / prevalence / positive predictive value

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Dirk Haselow, Aaron Wendelboe. How Prevalence Influences the Interpretation of Lyme Disease Test Results in a High-Incidence State (Wisconsin) Versus a Low-Incidence State (Arkansas). Zoonoses, 2025, 5 (1) : 31 DOI:10.15212/ZOONOSES-2025-0016

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Kugeler KJ, Earley A, Mead PS, Hinckley AF. Surveillance for Lyme disease after implementation of a revised case definition - United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2024; 73(6): 118-123.

[2]

Bobe JR, Jutras BL, Horn EJ, Embers ME, Bailey A, Moritz RL, et al. Recent progress in Lyme disease and remaining challenges. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8: 666554.

[3]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About Lyme disease. 2024 [updated 2024 Aug 26]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/about/index.html.

[4]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lyme disease (Borrelia burgdorferi) 2022 case definition . 2022 [accessed 2025 Aug 19]. Available from: https://ndc.services.cdc.gov/case-definitions/lyme-disease-2022/.

[5]

Lantos PM, Rumbaugh J, Bockenstedt LK, Falck-Ytter YT, Aguero-Rosenfeld ME, Auwaerter PG, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR): 2020 Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Lyme Disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2021; 72(1): 1-8.

[6]

Schwartz AM, Nelson CA, Hinckley AF. Epidemiology of Lyme disease diagnoses among older adults, United States, 2016-2019. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024; 30(9): 1926-1929.

[7]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pretest probability of Lyme disease. 2025 [accessed 2025 Jun 26]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/resources/pdfs/lyme-testing-aid_prior-pretest_combined-low-ink-p.pdf.

[8]

Centers for disease control and prevention. National notifiable disease surveillance system, table 2j. Listeriosis; lyme disease; annual reported cases* of notifiable diseases, by region and reporting area, united states, U.S. Territories, and non-U.S. Residents, 2022. Center for surveillance, epidemiology, and laboratory services. 2024. [accessed 2025 Aug 19]. Available from https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/175692.

[9]

USA Facts . Our changing population: United States. 2024 [accessed 2024 Dec 12]. Available from: https://usafacts.org/data/topics/people-society/population-and-demographics/our-changing-population/.

[10]

National Center for Health Statistics . National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2019. 2024 [accessed 2024 Dec 11]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/namcs_summary/2019-namcs-web-tables-508.pdf.

[11]

Waddell LA, Greig J, Mascarenhas M, Harding S, Lindsay R, Ogden N. The accuracy of diagnostic tests for Lyme disease in humans, a systematic review and meta-analysis of North American Research. PLoS One. 2016; 11(12): e0168613.

[12]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lyme Disease: What you Need to Know . 2020. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/media/pdfs/Lyme-Disease-What-you-need-to-know.pdf.

[13]

Lyme Wellness Initiative . Lyme sisease treatment. 2025. Available from: https://www.lyme.health.harvard.edu/lyme-disease-treatment/.

[14]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lyme disease rashes. 2024 [accessed 2024 Dec 12]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/signs-symptoms/lyme-disease-rashes.html.

[15]

Luna JC, Hartz L, Ngaruiya C. A case of rapidly progressive Lyme disease masquerading as cellulitis. Authorea. 2024. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.172534921.16937947/v1.

[16]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About southern tick-associated rash illness. 2024 [accessed 2024 Dec 12]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/about/about-southern-tick-associated-rash-illness.html.

PDF (392KB)

178

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉