Numerical Prediction and Corresponding Circular Economy Approaches for Resource Optimisation and Recovery of Underground Structures

Abstract

The transition from a linear economy to a circular economy is a significant component of economic, environmental and social sustainability. Underground metro infrastructures such as tunnels can play a vital role in a circular economy, resulting in greater sustainability and less contribution to climate change. This paper presents numerical models of small-scale brick-lined railway tunnels to identify the critical locations, and then proposes corresponding circular approaches and solutions for the design, maintenance, life extension and end-of-service-life (EoSL) stages of underground infrastructures. The proposed numerical model is firstly verified with respect to the relevant experimental model based on tests under various loading conditions. The results demonstrate that detailed failure processes can be realistically captured by the numerical model, while the macroscopic behaviour compares well with experimental observations. Numerical modelling and subsequent prediction stand out as a practical approach and a powerful performance-based tool for analysing the reuse/recycling potential of metro tunnels and then carrying out easy repair and design for adaptability, disassembly and recoverability of underground infrastructures for a circular economy.

Keywords

Resource optimisation / Waste recovery / Underground metro infrastructures / Numerical modelling / Circular economy

References

[1] EMF (Ellen MacArthur Foundation) (2015a) Growth within: a circular economy vision for a competitive Europe. http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/EllenMacArthurFoundation_Growth-Within_July15.pdf. Accessed 07 June 2019

[2] EC (European Council) (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives. Official Journal of the European Union L312/3

[3] HM Government (2008) Strategy for Sustainable Construction. HM Government in association with the Strategic Forum. http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file46535.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2014

[4] Construction Resources and Waste Platform Construction resources and waste roadmap: 2010 update, 2010, Watford: BRE

[5] Defra Statistical data set ENV23—UK waste data and management—total UK waste generation by sector 2004 to 2008, 2011, London: Defra

[6] Smith A (2013a) Clay bricks and clay blocks: a resource efficiency action plan. London, UK, The green construction board. http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/CBCB%20REAP%20October%202013.pdf. Accessed 05 June 2019

[7] Smith A (2013b) Precast concrete: a resource efficiency action plan. London, UK, The green construction board. http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/Precast%20REAP%20October%202013_0.pdf. Accessed 05 June 2019

[8] REAPs (2017) REAPs (Resource Efficiency Action Plans): Bricks, blocks and concrete—1st progress report. https://www.brick.org.uk/admin/resources/reap-progress-report-1.pdf. Accessed 05 June 2019

[9] UKGBC (2019) Circular economy guidance for construction clients: How to practically apply circular economy principles at the project brief stage, UKGBC

[10] BDA (Brick Development Association) (2014a) BDA comment on the use of reclaimed clay bricks. BDA, London, UK, pp 10–11. http://www.brick.org.uk/admin/resources/g-reclaimed-brickwork.pdf. Accessed 05 June 2019

[11] Hradil P, Talja A, Wahlström M, Huuhka S, Lahdensivu J, Pikkuvirta J (2014) Re-use of structural elements—Environmentally efficient recovery of building components

[12] Economy C. The circularity gap report—closing the circularity gap in a 9% world, 2019, Amsterdam: Circle Economy

[13] URBACT Cities of tomorrow—action today. URBACT II capitalisation. Building energy efficiency in European Cities, 2013, France: URBACT

[14] United Nations (2015a) Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2019

[15] United Nations (2015b) Transforming the World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1

[16] EMF (Ellen MacArthur Foundation) (2015b) Delivering the circular economy: a tool kit for policy makers. Construction and Real Estate

[17] European Commission (2015) Roadmap: circular economy strategy. http://ec.europa.eu/smartregulation/impact/planned_ia/docs/2015_env,_065_env + _032_circular_economy_en.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2015

[18] Mendoza JMF, Sharmina M, Gallego-Schmid A, Heyes G, Azapagic A. Integrating backcasting and eco-design for the circular economy: the BECE framework. J Ind Ecol, 2017, 21(3): 526-544

[19] Hopkinson P, Chen HM, Zhou K, Wang Y, Lam D. Recovery and reuse of structural products from end-of-life buildings. Proc Inst Civil Eng Eng Sustain, 2019, 172(3): 119-128

[20] European Commission (2019) JRC technical report: standardisation needs for the design of underground structures

[21] BBC (2016) Climate change: the massive CO₂ emitter you may not know about, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-46455844. Accessed 10 May 2019

[22] Heyes G, Sharmina M, Mendoza JMF, Gallego-Schmid A, Azapagic A. Developing and implementing circular economy business models in service-oriented technology companies. J Clean Prod, 2018, 177: 621-632

[23] Defra NS. Monthly statistics of building materials and components, 2019, London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and National Statistics 47

[24] BDA (Brick Development Association) (2014b) Scottish traditional brickwork. http://www.brick.org.uk/admin/resources/g-scottish-traditional-brickwork.pdf. Accessed 18 Dec 2018

[25] Klang Anders, Vikman Per-Åke, Brattebø Helge. Sustainable management of demolition waste—an integrated model for the evaluation of environmental, economic and social aspects. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2003, 38(4): 317-334

[26] BioRegional Development Group, Reclamation Led Approach to Demolition (2007) https://www.bioregional.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/ReclamationtoDemolition_Jul07.pdf. Accessed 03 Dec 2018

[27] Huuhka S, Kaasalainen T, Hakanen JH, Lahdensivu J. Reusing concrete panels from buildings for building: potential in Finnish 1970s mass housing. Resour Conserv Recycl, 2015, 101: 105-121

[28] Pomponi F, Moncaster A. Embodied carbon mitigation reduction in the built environment–what does the evidence say?. J Environ Manage, 2016, 181: 687-700

[29] Eberhardt LCM, Birgisdóttir H, Birkved M. Life cycle assessment of a Danish office building designed for disassembly. Build Res Inf, 2019, 47(6): 666-680

[30] Densley D, Tingley D, Davison B. Design for deconstruction and material reuse. Proc ICE Energy, 2011, 164: 195-204.

[31] Huuhka S (2010a) Kierrätys arkkitehtuurissa: Betonielementtien ja muiden rakennusosien uudelleenkäyttö uudisrakentamisessa ja lähiöiden energiatehokkaassa korjaus- ja täydennysrakentamisessa. MSc thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland. http://URN.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tty-201004161101. Accessed 19 July 2018. (in Finnish)

[32] Huuhka S. Purkubetoni kierrätetään tienpohjiksi–tulevaisuudessa ehkä myös taloiksi. Betoni, 2010, 2010(2): 50-55 (in Finnish)

[33] Sansom M, Avery N. Briefing: reuse and recycling rates of UK steel demolition arisings. Proc Inst Civil Eng Eng Sustain, 2014, 167(3): 89-94.

[34] Broadbent C. Steel’s recyclability: demonstrating the benefits of recycling steel to achieve a circular economy. Int J Life Cycle Assess, 2016, 21(11): 1658-1665

[35] Wang P, Li W, Kara S. Cradle-to-cradle modeling of the future steel flow in China. Resour Conserv Recycl, 2017, 117: 45-57

[36] Diener DL, Tillman AM. Component end-of-life management: exploring opportunities and related benefits of remanufacturing and functional recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl, 2015, 102: 80-93

[37] Dunant CF, Drewniok MP, Sansom M Real and perceived barriers to steel re-use across the UK construction value chain. Resour Conserv Recycl, 2017, 126: 118-131

[38] Rebrick (2013) http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eco-innovation/projects/en/projects/rebrick. Accessed 10 July 2019

[39] Sencu RM, Wang YC, Yang J, Lam D. Performance evaluation of demountable shear connectors with collar step at ambient and elevated temperatures. Eng Struct, 2019, 194: 94-105

[40] Dai X, Lam D, Sheehan T, Yang J, Zhou K (2018) Use of bolted shear connectors in composite construction. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on advances in steel-concrete composite structures. ASCCS 2018. Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València, pp 475–482

[41] UIA (Urban Innovation Actions) (2018) Identify and Test Innovative Solutions for Sustainable Urban Development. UIA, Lille, France. http://www.uia-initiative.eu/en/uia-cities/kerkrade. Accessed 23 June 2019

[42] DRAGON (2015) A tunnel yields a whole lot of valuable materials. http://www.dragonproject.eu. Accessed 07 June 2019

[43] Zhou R, Chen HM. Mesoscopic investigation of size effect in notched concrete beams: the role of fracture process zone. Eng Fract Mech, 2019, 212: 136-152

[44] Zhou R, Lu Y. A mesoscale interface approach to modelling fractures in concrete for material investigation. Constr Build Mater, 2018, 165: 608-620

[45] Betti M, Drosopoulos GA, Stavroulakis GE. Two non-linear finite element models developed for the assessment of failure of masonry arches. Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 2008, 336(1–2): 42-53

[46] Lourenço PB. Roca P, González JL, Oñate E, Lourenço PB. Experimental and numerical issues in the modelling of the mechanical behaviour of masonry. Structural analysis of historical constructions II, 1998, CIMNE, Barcelona: Possibilities of numerical and experimental techniques 57-92.

[47] Valluzzi MR, Binda L, Modena C. Mechanical behaviour of historic masonry structures strengthened by bed joints structural repointing. Constr Build Mater, 2005, 19: 63-73

[48] Idris J, Verdel T, Al-Heib M. Numerical modelling and mechanical behaviour analysis of ancient tunnel masonry structures. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 2008, 23: 251-263

[49] Chen H-M, Yu H-S, Smith MJ. Physical model tests and numerical simulation for assessing the stability of brick-lined tunnels. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol, 2016, 53(2016): 109-119

[50] The world’s largest tunnel database (2004) The world’s longest Tunnel page database, 2004: http://home.no.net/lotsberg/. Accessed 27 May 2019

[51] Murphy E (2016) Reconstruction of Farnworth Tunnels, The British Tunnelling Society

[52] Asokan P, Osmani M, Price ADF. Assessing the recycling potential of glass fibre reinforced plastic waste in concrete and cement composites. J Clean Prod, 2009, 17(9): 821-829

[53] Jin Y, Ding W, Yan Z, Soga K, Li Z. Experimental investigation of the nonlinear behavior of segmental joints in a water-conveyance tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 2017, 68: 153-166

[54] Goodfellow RJF (2011) Concrete for underground structures—guidelines for design and construction. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration (SME). https://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpCUSGDC01/concrete-underground/concrete-underground. Accessed 05 Oct 2018

[55] WSP and MMM Group (2017) George Massey tunnel replacement project tunnel decommissioning options. https://engage.gov.bc.ca/app/uploads/sites/52/2017/02/GMT-Tunnel-Decommisioning-Options-Feb-2017.pdf. Accessed 05 Apr 2019

[56] D’Aloia Schwartzentruber L, Humbert E, Bonnet R (2015) Life Cycle Assessment applied to the construction of tunnel. In: SEE Tunnel: promoting tunneling in SEE Region“ITA WTC 2015 congress and 41st general assembly. Lacroma Valamar Congress Center, Dubrovnik, Croatia

[57] Chen H-M (2014) Physical model tests and numerical simulation for assessing the stability of tunnels. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, UK

[58] Chen H-M, Smith MJ, Yu H-S, Kokkas N. Monitoring the deformation of small scale model tunnels under load testing. Surv Rev, 2014, 46(339): 417-425

[59] Chen H-M, Yu H-S, Smith MJ, Kokkas N (2013) Advanced monitoring techniques for assessing the stability of small-scale tunnels. In: 2nd Joint international symposium on deformation monitoring (JISDM), The University of Nottingham on 9–11 September 2013

[60] Juspi S (2007) Experimental validation of the shakedown concept for pavement analysis and design. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Nottingham

[61] Hammond GP, Jones C (2011) Inventory of carbon and energy version 2.0 (ICE V2. 0). Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK

[62] BDA (2016) Brick sustainability report. https://www.brick.org.uk/admin/resources/brick-sustainability-report-2016-1.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2018

[63] BDA (2017) REAP Report, the sustainability section. https://www.brick.org.uk/admin/resources/reap-progress-report-1.pdf. Accessed 17 Dec 2018

[64] Kay T, Essex J (2008) Pushing reuse: towards a low-carbon construction industry. Salvo Llp, London, UK, BioRegional, Wallington, UK. https://bioregional.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/PushingReuse.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2018