Short wind pulses consistently change the morphology of roots, but not of shoots, across young plants of different growth forms

Johannes Heinze, Luise Werger, Michael Ogden, Thilo Heinken, Rainer Hoefgen, Ewald Weber

Stress Biology ›› 2023, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 43. DOI: 10.1007/s44154-023-00123-z
Short Communication

Short wind pulses consistently change the morphology of roots, but not of shoots, across young plants of different growth forms

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Wind is an environmental stimulus that stresses plants of all growth forms at all life-stages by influencing the development, architecture, and morphology of roots and shoots. However, comparative studies are scarce and no study directly investigated whether shoot and root morphological traits of trees, grasses and forbs differ in their response to short wind pulses of different wind intensity. In this study, we found that across species, wind stress by short wind pulses of increasing intensity consistently changed root morphology, but did not affect shoot morphological traits, except plant height in four species. Wind effects in roots were generally weak in tree species but consistent across growth forms. Furthermore, plant height of species was correlated with changes in specific root length and average diameter.

Our results indicate that short-pulse wind treatments affect root morphology more than shoot morphology across growth forms. They further suggest that wind stress possibly promotes root anchorage in young plants and that these effects might depend on plant height.

Keywords

Wind stress / Leaf traits / Root traits / Growth form / Morphology

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Johannes Heinze, Luise Werger, Michael Ogden, Thilo Heinken, Rainer Hoefgen, Ewald Weber. Short wind pulses consistently change the morphology of roots, but not of shoots, across young plants of different growth forms. Stress Biology, 2023, 3(1): 43 https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-023-00123-z

References

[1]
AntenNPR, Alcalá-HerreraR, SchievingF, OnodaY. Wind and mechanical stimuli differentially affect leaf traits in Plantago major. New Phytol, 2010, 188: 554-564
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
BardgettRD, MommerL, de VriesFT. Going underground: root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol, 2014, 29: 692-699
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
BuryloM, ReyF, RoumetC, BuissonE, DutoitT. Linking plant morphological traits to uprooting resistance in eroded marly lands (Southern Alps, France). Plant Soil, 2009, 324: 31-42
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
CipolliniDF. Wind-induced mechanical stimulation increases pest resistance in common bean. Oecologia, 1997, 111: 84-90
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
De Langre E (2008) Effects of wind on plants. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 40:141–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102135
[6]
FengJ, HuangP, WanX. Interactive effects of wind and light on growth and architecture of poplar saplings. Ecol Res, 2019, 34: 94-105
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
GardinerB, BerryP, MouliaB. Review: Wind impacts on plant growth, mechanics and damage. Plant Sci, 2016, 245: 94-118
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
JamesKR, HaritosN, AdesPK. Mechanical stability of trees under dynamic loads. Am J Bot, 2006, 93: 1522-1530
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
LarsonJA, FunkJL. Seedling root responses to soil moisture and the identification of belowground trait spectrum across three growth forms. New Phytol, 2016, 210: 827-838
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
LeeS, SergeevaLI, VreughenhilD. Natural variation of hormone levels in Arabidopsis roots and correlations with complex root architecture. Int J Plant Biol, 2018, 60: 292-309
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
LiuC, LiY, ChenL, HeN. Variation in leaf morphological, stomatal, and anatomical traits and their relationships in temperate and subtropical forests. Sci Rep, 2019, 9: 5803
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Pérez-HarguindeguyN, DiazS, GarnierE, et al.. New handbook for standardized measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Austral J Bot, 2013, 61: 167-234
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
RetuertoR, WoodwardFI. Effects of windspeed on the growth and biomass allocation of white mustard Sinapis alba L. Oecologia, 1992, 92: 113-123
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
RoseL. Pitfalls in root trait calculations: how ignoring diameter heterogeneity can lead to overestimation of functional traits. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 898
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
SchuttenJ, DaintyJ, DavyJ. Root anchorage and its significance for submerged plants in shallow lakes. J Ecol, 2005, 93: 556-571
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
SellierD, SuzukiS. Age dynamics of wind risk and tree sway characteristics in a softwood plantation. Front For Glob Change, 2020, 3: 89
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
TelewskiFW. Mechanosensing and plant growth regulators elicited during the thigmomorphogenetic response. Front For Glob Change, 2021, 3: 574096
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
TengRM, WangY-X, LiH, LinS-J, LiuH, ZhuangJ. Effects of shading on lignin biosynthesis in the leaf of tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze). Mol Genet Genomics, 2021, 296: 165-177
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
WergerL, BergmannJ, WeberE, HeinzeJ. Wind intensity affects fine root morphological traits with consequences for plant-soil feedback effects. AoB Plants, 2020, 12(5):plaa050
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
YangM, DéfossezP, DanjonF, DupontS, FourcaudT. Which root architectural elements contribute the best to anchorage of Pinus species? Insigths from in silico experiments. Plant Soil, 2016, 411: 275-291
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
ZhangS, LiuG, CuiQ, HuangZ, YeX, CornelissenJHC. New field wind manipulation methodology reveals adaptive responses of steppe plants to increased and reduced wind speed. Plant Methods, 2021, 17: 5
CrossRef Google scholar

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/