iTRAQ-based protein profiling and functional identification of four genes involved in rice basal resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae in two contrasting rice genotypes

Chenchen Li, Ziqiang Chen, Yun Deng, Shuyu Jiang, Yan Su, Shaohua Yang, Yan Lin, Dagang Tian

Stress Biology ›› 2023, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 39. DOI: 10.1007/s44154-023-00118-w
Original Paper

iTRAQ-based protein profiling and functional identification of four genes involved in rice basal resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae in two contrasting rice genotypes

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Rice blast, caused by Magnaporthe oryzae, is one of the most destructive rice diseases. Developing blast-resistant rice cultivars represents the most economical and environmentally friend strategy for managing the disease. In our previous study, an isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ)-based comparative protein quantification was carried out to investigate the resistance gene Piz-t gene-mediated resistance response to infection in two contrasting rice genotypes of the Piz-t transgenic Nipponbare line (NPB-Piz-t) and its wild-type Nipponbare (NPB). Here, from the comparisons of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) of NPB-Piz-t to the avirulent isolate KJ201 (KJ201-Piz-t)and the virulent isolate RB22 (RB22-Piz-t) with mock-treated NPB-Piz-t (Mock-Piz-t), NPB to the virulent isolate KJ201(KJ201-NPB) and RB22 (RB22-NPB) with mock-treated NPB (Mock-NPB), 1, 1, and 6 common DEPs were, respectively, identified at 24, 48 and 72 h post-inoculation (hpi) in the susceptible comparisons of RB22-Pizt/Mock-Piz-t, KJ201-NPB/Mock-NPB, and RB22-NPB/Mock-NPB, involving in gi|54,290,836 and gi|59,800,021 were identified in the resistance comparison KJ201-Piz-t/Mock-Piz-t at 48 and 72 hpi respectively. Moreover, four genes of Os01g0138900 (gi|54,290,836), Os04g0659300 (gi|59,800,021), Os09g0315700 (gi|125,563,186) or Os04g0394200 (gi|21,740,743) were knocked out or overexpressed in NPB using gene over-expression and CRISPR/Cas9 technology, and results verified that the Os01g0138900 obviously affected the rice blast resistance. Further, expression and targeted metabolomics analysis illuminated the resistance response of cysteine-containing substances as gi|59,800,021 under blast infection. These results provide new targets for basal resistance gene identification and open avenues for developing novel rice blast resistant materials.

Keywords

Rice / iTRAQ / CRISPR/Cas9 / Rice blast / Basal resistance gene

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chenchen Li, Ziqiang Chen, Yun Deng, Shuyu Jiang, Yan Su, Shaohua Yang, Yan Lin, Dagang Tian. iTRAQ-based protein profiling and functional identification of four genes involved in rice basal resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae in two contrasting rice genotypes. Stress Biology, 2023, 3(1): 39 https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-023-00118-w

References

[1]
DanglJL, HorvathDM, StaskawiczBJ. Pivoting the plant immune system from dissection to deployment. Science, 2013, 341(6147):746-751
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
DengY, HeZ. Genome editing enables defense-yield balance in rice. Stress Biology, 2023, 3: 22
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
GulickAM, SchmidtDM, GerltJA, RaymentI. Evolution of enzymatic activities in the enolase superfamily: crystal structures of the L-Ala-D/L-Glu epimerases from Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Biochemistry, 2001, 40(51):15716-15724
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
HeZ, WebsterS, HeSY. Growth-defense trade-offs in plants. Curr Biol, 2022, 32: 634-639
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Kitajima S, Sato F (1999) Plant Pathogenesis-Related Proteins: Molecular Mechanisms of Gene Expression and Protein Function. J Biochem 125(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022244
[6]
KlenchinVA, SchmidtDM, GerltJA, RaymentI. Evolution of enzymatic activities in the enolase superfamily: structure of a substrate-liganded complex of the L-Ala-D/L-Glu epimerase from Bacillus subtilis. Biochemistry, 2004, 43(32):10370-10378
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Li W, Wang B, Wu J, Lu G, Hu Y, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Zhao Q, Feng Q, Zhang H, Wang Z, Wang G, Han B, Wang Z, Zhou B (2009) The Magnaporthe oryzae Avirulence Gene AvrPiz-t Encodes a Predicted Secreted Protein That Triggers the Immunity in Rice Mediated by the Blast Resistance Gene Piz-t. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22(4):411–420. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-22-4-0411
[8]
LiW, ZhuZ, ChernM, YinJ, YangC, RanL, ChengM, HeM, WangK, WangJ. A natural allele of a transcription factor in rice confers broad-spectrum blast resistance. Cell, 2017, 170: 114-126.e15
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
LuC, JiangY, YueY, SuiY, HaoM, KangX, WangQ, ChenD, LiuB, YinZ, WangL, LiY, DongH, LiX, XinX, LiuY, DingX. Glutathione and neodiosmin feedback sustain plant immunity. J Exp Bot, 2023, 74(3):976-990
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
NiksRE, QiXQ, MarcelTC. Quantitative resistance to biotrophic filamentous plant pathogens: concepts, misconceptions, and mechanisms. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 2015, 53: 445-470
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
ParkCH, ChenS, ShirsekarG, ZhouB, KhangCH, SongkumarnP, et al.. The Magnaporthe oryzae efector AvrPiz-t targets the RING E3 ubiquitin ligase APIP6 to suppress pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity in rice. Plant Cell, 2012, 24: 4748-4762
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
ParkCH, ShirsekarG, BellizziM, ChenS, SongkumarnP, XieX, et al.. The E3 ligase APIP10 connects the efector AvrPiz-t to the NLR receptor Piz-t in rice. Plos Pathog, 2016, 12: e1005529
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
TangMZ, NingYS, ShuXL, DongB, ZhangHY, WuDX, et al.. The Nup98 homolog APIP12 targeted by the efector AvrPiz-t is involved in rice basal resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae. Rice, 2017, 10: 5
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
TauzinAS, GiardinaT. Sucrose and invertases, a part of the plant defense response to the biotic stresses. Front Plant Sci, 2014, 5: 293
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
TianD, YangL, ChenZ, ChenZ, WangF, ZhouY, LuoY, YangL, ChenS. Proteomic analysis of the defense response to Magnaporthe oryzae in rice harboring the blast resistance gene Piz-t. Rice (n Y), 2018, 11(1):47
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
TsudaK, KatagiriF. Comparing signaling mechanisms engaged in pattern-triggered and effector-triggered immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2010, 13(4):459-465
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Van SchieCCN, TakkenFLW. Susceptibility Genes 101: How to Be a Good Host. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 2014, 52(1):551-581
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
WangR, NingY, ShiX, HeF, ZhangC, FanJ, et al.. Immunity to rice blast disease by suppression of efector-triggered necrosis. Curr Biol, 2016, 26: 2399-2411
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
YanXX, QiaoHB, ZhangXM, GuoCL, WangMN, WangYJ, WangXP. Analysis of the grape (Vitis vinifera L.) thaumatin-like protein (TLP) gene family and demonstration that TLP29 contributes to disease resistance. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1):4269 Published 2017 Jun 27
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
YasudaN, MitsunagaT, HayashiK, KoizumiS, FujitaY. Effects of pyramiding quantitative resistance genes Pi21, Pi34, and Pi35 on rice leaf blast disease. Plant Dis, 2015, 99: 904-909
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
YinJ, ZouL, ZhuX, CaoY, HeM, ChenX. Fighting the enemy: How rice survives the blast pathogen’s attack. The Crop J, 2021, 9: 543-552
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
YounasMU, WangG, DuH, ZhangY, AhmadI, RajputN, LiM, FengZ, HuK, KhanNU, XieW, QasimM, ChenZ, ZuoS. Approaches to Reduce Rice Blast Disease Using Knowledge from Host Resistance and Pathogen Pathogenicity. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(5):4985
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Yu X, Feng B, He P, Shan L (2017) From chaos to harmony: responses and signaling upon microbial pattern recognition. Annu Rev Phytopathol 55:109–137. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035649
[24]
YuanM, NgouBPM, DingP, XinXF. PTI-ETI crosstalk: an integrative view of plant immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2021, 62: 102030
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
ZhaoJ, YangY, YangD, ChengY, JiaoM, ZhanG, ZhangH, WangJ, ZhouK, HuangL, KangZ. Characterization and Genetic Analysis of Rice Mutant crr1 Exhibiting Compromised Non-host Resistance to Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst). Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7: 1822
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
ZhengY, ZhangX, LiuY, et al.. Crystal structure of rice APIP6 reveals a new dimerization mode of RING-type E3 ligases that facilities the construction of its working model. Phytopathol Res, 2023, 5: 31
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Zhou B, Qu S, Liu G, Dolan M, Sakai H, Lu G, Bellizzi M, Wang GL (2006) The Eight Amino-Acid Differences Within Three Leucine-Rich Repeats Between Pi2 and Piz-t Resistance Proteins Determine the Resistance Specificity to Magnaporthe grisea. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19(11);1216–1228. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-19-1216
[28]
ZhuD, KangH, LiZ, LiuM, ZhuX, WangY, WangD, WangZ, LiuW, WangGL. A Genome-Wide Association Study of Field Resistance to Magnaporthe Oryzae in Rice. Rice (n Y), 2016, 9(1):44
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
ZipfelC, RobatzekS, NavarroL, OakeleyEJ, JonesJD, FelixG, BollerT. Bacterial disease resistance in Arabidopsis through flagellin perception. Nature, 2004, 428(6984):764-767
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
ZipfelC, KunzeG, ChinchillaD, CaniardA, JonesJD, BollerT, FelixG. Perception of the bacterial PAMP EF-Tu by the receptor EFR restricts Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Cell, 2006, 125(4):749-760
CrossRef Google scholar
Funding
Youth Program of Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences (FAAS) grant(YC2019004); Nurturing National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Research Project(GJPY2019002); Key Program of the National Natural Science of Fujian province(2022J02010); National Natural Science Foundation of China(U2005211)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/