VIGE: virus-induced genome editing for improving abiotic and biotic stress traits in plants
Irene N. Gentzel, Erik W. Ohlson, Margaret G. Redinbaugh, Guo-Liang Wang
VIGE: virus-induced genome editing for improving abiotic and biotic stress traits in plants
Agricultural production is hampered by disease, pests, and environmental stresses. To minimize yield loss, it is important to develop crop cultivars with resistance or tolerance to their respective biotic and abiotic constraints. Transformation techniques are not optimized for many species and desirable cultivars may not be amenable to genetic transformation, necessitating inferior cultivar usage and time-consuming introgression through backcrossing to the preferred variety. Overcoming these limitations will greatly facilitate the development of disease, insect, and abiotic stress tolerant crops. One such avenue for rapid crop improvement is the development of viral systems to deliver CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing technology to plants to generate targeted beneficial mutations. Viral delivery of genomic editing constructs can theoretically be applied to span the entire host range of the virus utilized, circumventing the challenges associated with traditional transformation and breeding techniques. Here we explore the types of viruses that have been optimized for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, the phenotypic outcomes achieved in recent studies, and discuss the future potential of this rapidly advancing technology.
Biotic stress / Abiotic stress / CRISPR/Cas9 / Plants / Virus / Gene editing
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
Chiong KT, Cody WB, Scholthof HB (2021) RNA silencing suppressor-influenced performance of a virus vector delivering both guide RNA and Cas9 for CRISPR gene editing. Sci Rep 11:1–13
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
Dulermo T, Bligny R, Gout E, Cotton P (2009) Amino acid changes during sunflower infection by the necrotrophic fungus B. cinerea. Plant Signal Behav 4(9):859–861
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
|
[55] |
|
[56] |
|
[57] |
|
[58] |
|
[59] |
Shiferaw B, Prasanna BM, Hellin J, Bänziger M (2011) Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security. Food Secur 3:307
|
[60] |
|
[61] |
|
[62] |
|
[63] |
|
[64] |
Uranga M, Aragonés V, Selma S, Vázquez-Vilar M, Orzáez D, Daròs J-A (2021a) Efficient Cas9 multiplex editing using unspaced sgRNA arrays engineering in a potato virus X vector. Plant J:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.25.170977
|
[65] |
|
[66] |
|
[67] |
|
[68] |
|
[69] |
Wang M, Gao S, Zeng W, Yang Y, Ma J, Wang Y (2020) Plant virology delivers diverse toolsets for biotechnology. Viruses 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111338
|
[70] |
|
[71] |
|
[72] |
|
[73] |
|
[74] |
|
[75] |
Yu Y, Pan Z, Wang X, Bian X, Wang W, Liang Q, Kou M, Ji H, Li Y, Ma D, Li Z, Sun J (2021). Targeting of SPCSV-RNase3 via CRISPR-Cas13 confers resistance against sweet potato virus disease. Mol Plant Pathol. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.13146
|
[76] |
|
[77] |
|
[78] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |