Unlocking the bacterial contact-dependent antibacterial activity to engineer a biocontrol alliance of two species from natural incompatibility to artificial compatibility

Qianhua Wu, Bozhen Wang, Xi Shen, Danyu Shen, Bingxin Wang, Qinggang Guo, Tao Li, Xiaolong Shao, Guoliang Qian

Stress Biology ›› 2021, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (1) : 19. DOI: 10.1007/s44154-021-00018-x
Original Paper

Unlocking the bacterial contact-dependent antibacterial activity to engineer a biocontrol alliance of two species from natural incompatibility to artificial compatibility

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) contain various biocontrol bacteria with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, and their single species has been extensively applied to control crop diseases. The development of complex biocontrol community by mixing two or more PGPR members together is a promising strategy to enlarge the efficacy and scope of biocontrol. However, an effective method to assess the natural compatibility of PGPR members has not yet been established to date. Here, we developed such a tool by using the bacterial contact-dependent antibacterial activity (CDAA) as a probe. We showed that the CDAA events are common in two-species interactions in the four selected representative PGPRs, represented by the incompatible interaction of Lysobacter enzymogenes strain OH11 (OH11) and Lysobacter antibioticus strain OH13 (OH13). We further showed that the CDAA between OH11 and OH13 is jointly controlled by a contact-dependent killing device, called the type IV secretion system (T4SS). By deleting the respective T4SS synthesis genes, the T4SS in both strains was co-inactivated and this step unlocked  their natural CDAA, resulting in an engineered, compatible mutant alliance that co-displayed antibacterial and antifungal activity. Therefore, this study reveals that releasing bacterial CDAA is effective to rationally engineer the biocontrol community.

Keywords

PGPR / Biocontrol / Contact-dependent antibacterial activity / T4SS / Engineering

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qianhua Wu, Bozhen Wang, Xi Shen, Danyu Shen, Bingxin Wang, Qinggang Guo, Tao Li, Xiaolong Shao, Guoliang Qian. Unlocking the bacterial contact-dependent antibacterial activity to engineer a biocontrol alliance of two species from natural incompatibility to artificial compatibility. Stress Biology, 2021, 1(1): 19 https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-021-00018-x

References

[1]
BaslerM, HoB, MekalanosJ. Tit-for-tat: type VI secretion system counterattack during bacterial cell-cell interactions. Cell, 2013, 152(4):884-894
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Bayer-SantosE, CenensW, MatsuyamaB, et al.. The opportunistic pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia utilizes a type IV secretion system for interbacterial killing. PLoS Pathog, 2019, 15(9):e1007651
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
BernalP, AllsoppL, FillouxA, LlamasM. The Pseudomonas putida T6SS is a plant warden against phytopathogens. ISME J, 2017, 11(4):972-987
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
BhattacharyyaP, JhaD. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microb Biotechnol, 2012, 28(4):1327-1350
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
BottaiD, GröschelM, BroschR. Type VII secretion systems in gram-positive bacteria, 2016 Cham Springer International Publishing 235-265
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
DongL, GuoQ, WangP, ZhangX, SuZ, ZhaoW, LuX, LiS, MaP. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the colonization characteristics of Bacillus subtilis strain NCD-2 on cotton root. Curr Microbiol, 2020, 77(8):1600-1609
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
FinnR, ClementsJ, EddyS. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res, 2011, 39(suppl):W29-W37
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
FiraD, DimkićI, BerićT, LozoJ, StankovićS. Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species. J Biotechnol, 2018, 285: 44-55
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
GalanJE, WaksmanG. Protein-injection machines in bacteria. Cell, 2018, 172(6):1306-1318
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
HaasD, DéfagoG. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2005, 3(4):307-319
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
HachaniA, WoodT, FillouxA. Type VI secretion and anti-host effectors. Curr Opin Microbiol, 2016, 29: 81-93
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
HernandezR, Gallegos-MonterrosaR, CoulthurstSJ. Type VI secretion system effector proteins: effective weapons for bacterial competitiveness. Cell Microbiol, 2020, 22(9):e13241
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
LabordaP, LiC, ZhaoY, et al.. Antifungal metabolite p-Aminobenzoic acid (pABA): mechanism of action and efficacy for the biocontrol of pear bitter rot disease. J Agric Food Chem, 2019, 67(8):2157-2165
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
LiangX, KamalF, PeiT, XuP, MekalanosJ, DongT. An onboard checking mechanism ensures effector delivery of the type VI secretion system in vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2019, 116(46):23292-23298
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
LinL, XuK, ShenD, ChouS, GomelskyM, QianG. Antifungal weapons of Lysobacter, a mighty biocontrol agent. Environ Microbiol, 2021, 23(10):5704-5715
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
LugtenbergB, KamilovaF. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol, 2009, 63(1):541-556
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
MassartS, PerazzolliM, HöfteM, PertotI, JijakliMH. Impact of the omic technologies for understanding the modes of action of biological control agents against plant pathogens. Biocontrol, 2015, 60(6):725-746
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
MendesR, GarbevaP, RaaijmakersJ. The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2013, 37(5):634-663
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
MuellerU, SachsJ. Engineering microbiomes to improve plant and animal health. Trends Microbiol, 2015, 23(10):606-617
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
QianG, WangY, LiuY, XuF, HeYW, DuL, VenturiV, FanJ, HuB, LiuF. Lysobacter enzymogenes uses two distinct cell-cell signaling systems for differential regulation of secondary-metabolite biosynthesis and colony morphology. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2013, 79(21):6604-6616
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
ShenX, WangB, YangN, et al.. Lysobacter enzymogenes antagonizes soilborne bacteria using the type IV secretion system. Environ Microbiol, 2021, 23(8):4673-4688
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Souza D, Oka G, Alvarez-Martinez C et al (2015) Bacterial killing via a type IV secretion system. Nat Commun 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7453
[23]
TrunkK, PeltierJ, LiuY, DillB, et al.. The type VI secretion system deploys antifungal effectors against microbial competitors. Nat Microbiol, 2018, 3(8):920-931
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
XuK, LinL, ShenD, ChouS, QianG. Clp is a “busy” transcription factor in the bacterial warrior, Lysobacter enzymogenes. Comput Struct Biotechnol J, 2021, 19: 3564-3572
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
YangM, RenS, ShenD, YangN, WangB, HanS, ShenX, ChouSH, QianG. An intrinsic mechanism for coordinated production of the contact-dependent and contact-independent weapon systems in a soil bacterium. PLoS Pathog, 2020, 16(10):e1008967
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
YuF, Zaleta-RiveraK, ZhuX, HuffmanJ, MilletJC, HarrisSD, YuenG, LiXC, DuL. Structure and biosynthesis of heat-stable antifungal factor (HSAF), a broad-spectrum antimycotic with a novel mode of action. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2007, 51(1):64-72
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
ZhaoY, QianG, YeY, WrightS, ChenH, ShenY, LiuF, DuL. Heterocyclic aromatic N-oxidation in the biosynthesis of phenazine antibiotics from Lysobacter antibioticus. Org Lett, 2016, 18(10):2495-2498
CrossRef Google scholar
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China(32072470)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/