Photobioreactor facade panels: enhancing comfort, reducing energy use, and capturing carbon in temperate continental climates
Yonca Yaman , Ayça Tokuç , İrem Deniz , Mehmet Akif Ezan , Gülden Köktürk , Meltem Conk Dalay , Zeliha Demirel
Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 357 -370.
Buildings contribute around 37% to global carbon emissions, prompting a growing interest in innovative carbon capture technologies. Among these, the integration of microalgae-based photosynthesis into building facades has emerged as a promising solution. This approach offers multiple benefits, including carbon sequestration, reduced energy consumption, dynamic shading, and improved thermal regulation. This paper investigates the impact of integrating photobioreactor (PBR) facade elements, specifically on the south-facing facade of an office building in a temperate continental climate. The study evaluates the system’s effects on indoor thermal and visual comfort, energy production, and carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration for three distinct PBR facade alternatives and compares them with a commercial curtain wall. The continuous PBR system varies in performance depending on production intensity, necessitating an initial optimization for thermal and visual comfort alongside energy use. Simulations were conducted using Rhinoceros/Grasshopper plug-ins, with optimization performed via the Octopus tool. The results, focusing on the Chlorella vulgaris algae strain, demonstrate that all facade configurations achieve a daylight performance exceeding 50% and meet desired thermal comfort levels. Although the energy generated by the PBR facade does not fully offset the building’s energy consumption, annual CO2 sequestration ranges from 84.87 kg to 770.13 kg. This study concludes that microalgae facades offer a viable strategy for enhancing a building’s energy performance and reducing CO2 emissions, without compromising occupant comfort. Additionally, the findings provide valuable insights for designers, researchers, investors and stakeholders and provides a payback period of these systems (16–24 years) for commercialization in the building industry.
Photobioreactor / Microalgae facade / CO2 fixation / Building performance / Environmental performance / Simple payback period
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Udayan A, Pandey AK, Sharma P et al. Emerging industrial applications of microalgae: challenges and future perspectives. Syst Microbiol and Biomanuf. 2021: 1; 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43393-021-00038-8 |
| [7] |
Chai WS, Tan WG, Munawaroh HSH, Gupta VK, Ho SH, Show PL. Multifaceted roles of microalgae in the application of wastewater biotreatment: a review, Environ. Pollut. 2021: 269; 116236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116236 |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
Mata TM, Martins AA, Calheiros CSC, Villanueva F, Alonso-Cuevilla NP, Gabriel MF, Silva GV. Indoor Air Quality: Rev Clean Technol Environ. 2022;9:118. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments9090118. |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
Ahmadi F, Wilkinson S, Rezazadeh H, Keawsawasvong S, Najafi Q, Masoumi A. Energy efficient glazing: a comparison of microalgae photobioreactor and Iranian Orosi window designs. Build Environ. 2023;233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109942. |
| [14] |
Girard F, Toublanc C, Andres Y, Dechandol E, Pruvost J. System modeling of the thermal behavior of a building equipped with facade-integrated photobioreactors: validation and comparative analysis. Energ Build. 2023;292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113147. |
| [15] |
Yaman Y, Tokuç A, Sener I, Altunacar N, Köktürk G, Deniz I, Ezan M. Energy Efficient Buildings with Algae. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021: 798; 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/798/1/012001 |
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
Maroušek J, Maroušková A, Kůs T, Recovery A. Utilization Environ Eff. 2020;1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1825560. |
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
Maroušek J, Gavurová B, Strunecký O, Maroušková A, Sekar M, Marek V. Techno-economic identification of production factors threatening the competitiveness of algae biodiesel. Fuel. 2023;344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128056. |
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
Yaman Y. Evaluation of Possibilities to Integrate Photosynthetic Organisms into Building Facades. Master Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, Turkey, 2022. (Unpublished) (In Turkish). |
| [24] |
ASHRAE Tech. Rep. American Society of Heating. Ventilating. and Air Conditioning Engineers guideline 14. measurement of energy and demand savings. (2014). |
| [25] |
Talaei M, Mahdavinejad M, Azari R, Prieto A, Sangin H. Multi-objective optimization of building-integrated microalgae photobioreactors for energy and daylighting performance. J Build Eng. 2021;42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102832. |
| [26] |
Talaei M, Sangin H. Thermal comfort, daylight, and energy performance of envelope-integrated algae-based bioshading and static shading systems through multi-objective optimization. J Build Eng. 2024;90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109435. |
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
ASHRAE. The 2001 ASHRAE handbook: fundamentals. Atlanta, GA; 2001. |
| [29] |
Zhao B, Su Y. Process effect of microalgal-carbon dioxide fixation and biomass production: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014: 31; 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.054 |
| [30] |
Pavlik D, Zhong Y, Daiek C, Wei L, Morgan R, Clary W, Liu Y. Microalgae cultivation for carbon dioxide sequestration and protein production using a high efficiency photobioreactor system. Algal Res. 2017: 413–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2017.06.003 |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Environment. Urbanisation and Climate Change (MEUCC), Construction and Installation Unit Prices 2024. https://yfk.csb.gov.tr/birim-fiyatlar-i-100468. Acccessed 16 August 2024. |
| [33] |
Republic of Türkiye Energy Market Regulatory Authority (EMRA). 2024 yılı inşaat ve Tesisat Birim Fiyatları. https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-1327/elektrik-faturalarina-esas-tarife-tablolari. Accessed 15 August 2024. |
| [34] |
Xu P, Shao S, Qian J, Li J, Xu R, Liu J, Zhou W. Scale-up of microalgal systems for decarbonization and bioproducts: challenges and opportunities. Bioresour Technol. 2024;130528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130528. |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
Genin SN, Aitchison JS, Allen DG. Photobioreactor-based energy sources. In: Pacheco Torgal F, Buratti C, Kalaiselvam S, Granqvist CG, Ivanov V, editors. Nano and Biotech based materials for Energy Building Efficiency. Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 429–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27505-5. |
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
Oncel SŞ, Kose A, Oncel DŞ. Façade integrated photobioreactors for building energy efficiency. In Pacheco-Torgal F, Rasmussen E, Granqvist CG, Ivanov C, Kaklauskas A, editors. Start-Up Creation: The Smart Eco-efficient Built Environment. Makonin. Woodhead Publishing; 2016. pp. 237–299. |
| [42] |
Vajdi S, Aslani A. Design and techno-economic analysis of direct CO2 capturing with integrated photobioreactors as a building façade. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments. 2023;56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2023.103068. |
| [43] |
Cervera Sardá R, Vicente CA. Case studies on the architectural integration of Photobioreactors in Building Façades. Nano and Biotech based materials for Energy Building Efficiency. Editors: Pacheco Torgal F, Buratti C, Kalaiselvam S, Granqvist CG, Ivanov V. Cham: Springer. |
Jiangnan University
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |