The responses of microbial extracellular enzyme activities to soil sample storage conditions across different soil types

Abstract

Microbial extracellular enzymes are key indicators of soil biogeochemical functioning, yet their sensitivity to storage conditions remains unclear and limits cross-study comparability. We evaluated how three storage conditions (−20 °C, air-drying, and freeze-drying) affect hydrolytic and oxidative enzyme activities across forest soils spanning an acidic-to-alkaline pH gradient in China (Acrisols, Luvisols, and Calcisols). Storage at −20 °C consistently preserved higher hydrolytic activities, whereas air-drying and freeze-drying caused significant reductions across all soils. Conversely, oxidative enzymes showed soil-specific responses: −20 °C was optimal for Acrisols; both −20 °C and freeze-drying outperformed air-drying in Luvisols; while storage conditions little affected Calcisols. Multivariate analysis revealed that, although both enzyme types were influenced by key soil properties (e.g., pH, carbon, nutrients), their primary drivers differed. Hydrolytic activities were predominantly governed by storage conditions, whereas oxidative activities were mainly regulated by climatic factors (temperature and precipitation). These findings underscore the necessity of tailoring storage protocols to specific soil and enzyme types. Standardizing and explicitly reporting these conditions will improve the reproducibility of enzyme assays, providing a robust methodological foundation for future ecological research.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

soil organic matter decomposition / soil sample storage / hydrolytic enzyme / oxidative enzyme / soil pH gradient / ecosystem function

Highlight

	● Storage at −20 °C optimally preserves hydrolytic enzyme activities in all soils.
	● Oxidative enzyme responses to storage conditions are highly soil-specific.
	● Storage dictates hydrolytic activity, while climate drives oxidative enzymes.
	● Tailoring storage protocols to soil and enzyme types ensures cross-study comparability.

References

[1] Adekanmbi, A.A., Dale, L., Shaw, L., Sizmur, T., 2023. Differential temperature sensitivity of intracellular metabolic processes and extracellular soil enzyme activities. Biogeosciences20, 2207–2219.

[2] Allison, S.D. 2006. Soil minerals and humic acids alter enzyme stability: implications for ecosystem processes. Biogeochemistry81, 361–373.

[3] Andrés Abellan, M., Wic Baena, C., García Morote, F.A., Picazo Cordoba, M.I., Candel Pérez, D., Lucas-Borja, M.E., 2011. Influence of the soil storage method on soil enzymatic activities. Forest Systems20, 379–388.

[4] Arias-Real, R., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Guareschi, S., Gutiérrez-Cánovas, C., 2025. Assessing the effects of fresh, air-drying and freezing preservation methods on enzymatic activities from fluvial ecosystems. Freshwater Biology70, e70095.

[5] Baldrian, P., 2014. Distribution of extracellular enzymes in soils: spatial heterogeneity and determining factors at various scales. Soil Science Society of America Journal78, 11–18.

[6] Brewer, P.E., Calderón, F., Vigil, M., von Fischer, J.C., 2018. Impacts of moisture, soil respiration, and agricultural practices on methanogenesis in upland soils as measured with stable isotope pool dilution. Soil Biology and Biochemistry127, 239–251.

[7] Burns, R.G., DeForest, J.L., Marxsen, J., Sinsabaugh, R.L., Stromberger, M.E., Wallenstein, M.D., Weintraub, M.N., Zoppini, A., 2013. Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry58, 216–234.

[8] Chávez-Avila, S., Valencia-Marin, M.F., Guzmán-Guzmán, P., Kumar, A., Babalola, O.O., del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda, M., de los Santos-Villalobos, S., Santoyo, G., 2023. Deciphering the antifungal and plant growth-stimulating traits of the stress-tolerant Streptomyces achromogenes subsp. achromogenes strain UMAF16, a bacterium isolated from soils affected by underground fires. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology53, 102859.

[9] Chen, H., Freeman, C., Liu, L.F., Wang, M., Wang, Y.F., 2025. Reconceptualizing peat carbon stabilization and preservation: from the "enzymic latch" to "intricate lock". Science Bulletin70, 2921–2924.

[10] Chen, J., Elsgaard, L., van Groenigen, K.J., Olesen, J.E., Liang, Z., Jiang, Y., Lærke, P.E., Zhang, Y.F., Luo, Y.Q., Hungate, B.A., Sinsabaugh, R.L., Jørgensen, U., 2020. Soil carbon loss with warming: new evidence from carbon-degrading enzymes. Global Change Biology26, 1944–1952.

[11] Chen, J., Sinsabaugh, R.L., van Groenigen, K.J., 2023. Soil extracellular enzymes for climate-smart and resource-efficient agroecosystems: research priorities. PLoS Climate2, e0000210.

[12] da Silva Aragão, O.O., de Oliveira-Longatti, S.M., Alves Souza, A., da Conceição Jesus, E., Neves Merlo, M., de Oliveira, E.P., de Souza Moreira, F.M., 2020. The effectiveness of a microbiological attribute as a soil quality indicator depends on the storage time of the sample. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition20, 2525–2535.

[13] Dadenko, E.V., Kazeev, K.S., Kolesnikov, S.I., Val’kov, V.F., 2009. Changes in the enzymatic activity of soil samples upon their storage. Eurasian Soil Science42, 1380–1385.

[14] DeForest, J.L., 2009. The influence of time, storage temperature, and substrate age on potential soil enzyme activity in acidic forest soils using MUB-linked substrates and L-DOPA. Soil Biology and Biochemistry41, 1180–1186.

[15] Dunn, C., Jones, T.G., Girard, A., Freeman, C., 2014. Methodologies for extracellular enzyme assays from wetland soils. Wetlands34, 9–17.

[16] Dutta, T., Neelapu, N.R.R, Wani, S.H., Surekha, C., 2019. Role and regulation of osmolytes as signaling molecules to abiotic stress tolerance. In: Khan, M.I.R., Reddy, P.S., Ferrante, A., Khan, N.A., eds. Plant Signaling Molecules. Duxford: Woodhead Publishing, 459–477.

[17] Freeman, C., Ostle, N., Kang, H., 2001. An enzymic 'latch' on a global carbon store. Nature409, 149.

[18] Fromin, N., 2025. Impacts of soil storage on microbial parameters. Soil11, 247–265.

[19] German, D.P., Chacon, S.S., Allison, S.D., 2011. Substrate concentration and enzyme allocation can affect rates of microbial decomposition. Ecology92, 1471–1480.

[20] Gómez, E.J., Delgado, J.A., González, J.M., 2020. Persistence of microbial extracellular enzymes in soils under different temperatures and water availabilities. Ecology and Evolution10, 10167–10176.

[21] Guo, X.X., Du, M., Gao, P., Tian, P., Zhao, G.J., Mu, X.M., Geng, R., 2024. Response of runoff-sediment processes to vegetation restoration patterns under different rainfall regimes on the Loess Plateau. CATENA234, 107647.

[22] Harkin, J.M., Obst, J.R., 1973. Lignification in trees: indication of exclusive peroxidase participation. Science180, 296–298.

[23] Hu, Y.L., Chen, J., Olesen, J.E., van Groenigen, K.J., Hui, D.F., He, X.H., Chen, G.Y., Deng, Q., 2024. Mycorrhizal association controls soil carbon-degrading enzyme activities and soil carbon dynamics under nitrogen addition: a systematic review. Science of the Total Environment948, 175008.

[24] Jacoby, R., Peukert, M., Succurro, A., Koprivova, A., Kopriva, S., 2017. The role of soil microorganisms in plant mineral nutrition—current knowledge and future directions. Frontiers in Plant Science8, 1617.

[25] Jenkinson, D.S., Brookes, P.C., Powlson, D.S., 2004. Measuring soil microbial biomass. Soil Biology and Biochemistry36, 5–7.

[26] Jones, D.L., Willett, V.B., 2006. Experimental evaluation of methods to quantify dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry38, 991–999.

[27] Kim, M., Or, D., 2019. Microscale pH variations during drying of soils and desert biocrusts affect HONO and NH₃ emissions. Nature Communications10, 3944.

[28] Lane, J.M., Delavaux, C.S., Van Koppen, L., Lu, P.N., Cade-Menun, B.J., Tremblay, J., Bainard, L.D., 2022. Soil sample storage conditions impact extracellular enzyme activity and bacterial amplicon diversity metrics in a semi-arid ecosystem. Soil Biology and Biochemistry175, 108858.

[29] Lee, Y.B., Lorenz, N., Dick, L.K., Dick, R.P., 2007. Cold storage and pretreatment incubation effects on soil microbial properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal71, 1299–1305.

[30] Li, C.Y., Wade, J., Vollbracht, K., Hooper, D.G., Wills, S.A., Margenot, A.J., 2025. Do chromogenic assays of soil enzyme activities need buffers? More disadvantages than advantages of modified universal buffer in the para-nitrophenyl-based assay of phosphomonoesterase and β-glucosidase activities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry202, 109704.

[31] Litewski, S., Mróz, M., Kusznierewicz, B., 2025. HPTLC based screening method for the evaluation of α-amylase inhibitory activity in edible flowers. Scientific Reports15, 38909.

[32] Liu, C.J., Chen, Z.C., Liu, S.R., Cao, K.F., Niu, B.L., Liu, X.J., Gao, X.M., 2023a. Multi-year throughfall reduction enhanced the growth and non-structural carbohydrate storage of roots at the expenses of above-ground growth in a warm-temperate natural oak forest. Forest Ecosystems10, 100118.

[33] Liu, P.P., Wang, D., Li, Y., Liu, J., Cui, Y.X., Liang, G.P., Wang, C.Q., Wang, C., Moorhead, D.L., Chen, J., 2024. Crop conversion from annual to perennials: an effective strategy to affect soil multifunctionality. Agronomy14, 594.

[34] Liu, Y., Jia, K.Z., Chen, H.Y., Wang, Z.L., Zhao, W., Zhu, L.W., 2023b. Cold-adapted enzymes: mechanisms, engineering and biotechnological application. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering46, 1399–1410.

[35] Liu, Z.H., Kuzyakov, Y., Fang, J., He, Y.C., Song, B., Razavi, B.S., Adams, J.M., 2025. Hotspots of enzyme activities reflect micro-scale heterogeneity in nutrient mobilization in paddy soils. Plant and Soil513, 1433–1450.

[36] Lougheed, A., Nkongolo, K., 2024. Effects of soil storage at freezing temperatures on soil enzymatic activities. American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology20, 250–258.

[37] Ma, Z.L., Xu, W.J., Chen, Y.M., Liu, M., Wen, J.H., 2024. A study of the influence of the type of land use on the enzymatic activity of soils in southwestern China. Forests15, 581.

[38] Mäkelä, M.R., Hildén, K.S., Kuuskeri, J., 2021. Fungal lignin-modifying peroxidases and H₂O₂-producing enzymes. Encyclopedia of Mycology2, 247–259.

[39] Moorhead, D., Cui, Y.X., Sinsabaugh, R., Schimel, J., 2023. Interpreting patterns of ecoenzymatic stoichiometry. Soil Biology and Biochemistry180, 108997.

[40] Moorhead, D.L., Lashermes, G., Sinsabaugh, R.L., 2012. A theoretical model of C- and N-acquiring exoenzyme activities, which balances microbial demands during decomposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry53, 133–141.

[41] Oskonbaeva, Z., Khan, A., Hemkemeyer, M., Schwalb, S., Joergensen, R.G., Wichern, F., 2024. From dry to thrive: increased metabolic activity, potassium content and a shift towards fungi after drying-rewetting reveals adjustment of the microbial community to osmotic stress. Applied Soil Ecology202, 105578.

[42] Peoples, M.S., Koide, R.T., 2012. Considerations in the storage of soil samples for enzyme activity analysis. Applied Soil Ecology62, 98–102.

[43] Pisano, R., Rasetto, V., Barresi, A.A., Kuntz, F., Aoude-Werner, D., Rey, L., 2013. Freeze-drying of enzymes in case of water-binding and non-water-binding substrates. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics85, 974–983.

[44] Ramirez, J.F., Kumara, U.G.V.S.S, Arulsamy, N., Boothby, T.C., 2024. Water content, transition temperature and fragility influence protection and anhydrobiotic capacity. BBA Advances5, 100115.

[45] Saiya-Cork, K.R., Sinsabaugh, R.L., Zak, D.R., 2002. The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry34, 1309–1315.

[46] Sinsabaugh, R.L., Hill, B.H., Follstad Shah, J.J., 2009. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature462, 795–798.

[47] Sinsabaugh, R.L., Lauber, C.L., Weintraub, M.N., Ahmed, B., Allison, S.D., Crenshaw, C., Contosta, A.R., Cusack, D., Frey, S., Gallo, M.E., Gartner, T.B., Hobbie, S.E., Holland, K., Keeler, B.L., Powers, J.S., Stursova, M., Takacs-Vesbach, C., Waldrop, M.P., Wallenstein, M.D., Zak, D.R., Zeglin, L.H., 2008. Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecology Letters11, 1252–1264.

[48] Su, L.F., Liu, Y., Tan, L.S., Zhou, X.L., Wang, T., She, Y.Y., Huang, J.F., Cai, Y.B., Li, S.H., Guo, P.P., Luo, M., 2025. Hydrolase-oxidase responses mediate distinct carbon dynamics following wetland conversion to paddy versus upland systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry211, 109973.

[49] Tian, C., Cui, D.Q., Cao, Y., Luo, S., Song, H.M., Yang, P.Z., Bai, Y.F., Tian, J.Q., 2025. Temperature-dependent soil storage: changes in microbial viability and respiration in semiarid grasslands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry202, 109673.

[50] Turner, B.L., Romero, T.E., 2010. Stability of hydrolytic enzyme activity and microbial phosphorus during storage of tropical rain forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry42, 459–465.

[51] Vance, E.D., Brookes, P.C., Jenkinson, D.S., 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry19, 703–707.

[52] Venkatesagowda, B., Dekker, R.F.H., 2021. Microbial demethylation of lignin: evidence of enzymes participating in the removal of methyl/methoxyl groups. Enzyme and Microbial Technology147, 109780.

[53] Wang, C.Q., Kuzyakov, Y., 2024. Soil organic matter priming: the pH effects. Global Change Biology30, e17349.

[54] Wang, F.C., Fang, X.M., Wang, G.G., Mao, R., Lin, X.F., Wang, H.M., Chen, F.S., 2019. Effects of nutrient addition on foliar phosphorus fractions and their resorption in different-aged leaves of Chinese fir in subtropical China. Plant and Soil443, 41–54.

[55] Wojewódzki, P., Lemanowicz, J., Debska, B., Haddad, S.A., 2022. Soil enzyme activity response under the amendment of different types of biochar. Agronomy12, 569.

[56] Xing, W., Hu, N., Li, Z.F., Feng, L.S., Zhang, W.D., Du Preez, G., Zhang, H.M., Li, D.C., Lu, S.B., Chang, S.X., Zhang, Q.W., Lou, Y.L., 2024. Soil enzyme profile analysis for indicating decomposer micro-food web. iMeta3, e161.

[57] Zhao, Q., Bell, S., Kukkadapu, R., Richardson, J., Cliff, J., Bowden, M., Leichty, S., Hofmockel, K.S., 2025. Accumulation of soil microbial necromass controlled by microbe–mineral interactions. Environ Scimental Science & Technology59, 17558–17570.

[58] Zuccarini, P., Sardans, J., Asensio, L., Peñuelas, J., 2023. Altered activities of extracellular soil enzymes by the interacting global environmental changes. Global Change Biology29, 2067–2091.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press