Soil dissolved organic carbon regulates the impact of biotic and abiotic factors on soil acidity and acid buffering capacity in the lateritic red soil

Shufang Chen , Shuang Zhang , Jiayi Chen , Qiuxue Ou , Jiaen Zhang , Hui Wei

Soil Ecology Letters ›› 2025, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) : 250339

PDF (2215KB)
Soil Ecology Letters ›› 2025, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) : 250339 DOI: 10.1007/s42832-025-0339-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Soil dissolved organic carbon regulates the impact of biotic and abiotic factors on soil acidity and acid buffering capacity in the lateritic red soil

Author information +
History +
PDF (2215KB)

Abstract

Soil susceptibility to acids is commonly assessed by soil pH buffering capacity (pHBC), which is often estimated in an acid buffer curve and considered to be mainly regulated by abiotic factors. This study was conducted to evaluate the sensitivity of soil pH thresholds and range to exogenous acids and examine the effects of biotic and abiotic factors on the acid buffering capacity of the lateritic red soil in a 90-day-period incubation, with addition of biochar or earthworms in either of sterilized or unsterilized soils as three treatment factors. The results showed that soil pH thresholds and range were highly sensitive indicators of soil susceptibility to pH change, compared with pHBC,and that soil microorganisms significantly regulated soil acid buffering capacity (p<0.05). Earthworm activities lowered soil pH by regulating soil microbial communities, while biochar application significantly increased soil pH. However, neither earthworm nor biochar additions substantially change soil acid buffering capacity. Content and fractions of soil dissolved organic carbon were significantly related to soil acid buffering capacity indices. Our results evidence the feasibility of soil pH thresholds and range to indicate soil susceptibility to external acids and assess soil acidification trends and dissolved organic carbon is of high importance in regulating acid buffering capacity.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

soil acidification / soil remediation / soil microbial community / soil organic carbon / global change

Highlight

● Soil pH thresholds and range were highly sensitive to indicate soil acid buffer capacity.

● Soil microorganisms regulated effects of earthworm or biochar additions on soil acidity.

● Soil DOC content and fractions greatly regulated soil acidity and acid buffering capacity.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shufang Chen, Shuang Zhang, Jiayi Chen, Qiuxue Ou, Jiaen Zhang, Hui Wei. Soil dissolved organic carbon regulates the impact of biotic and abiotic factors on soil acidity and acid buffering capacity in the lateritic red soil. Soil Ecology Letters, 2025, 7(4): 250339 DOI:10.1007/s42832-025-0339-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bao, S.D., 2000. Agro-Chemical Analyses of Soils. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press.

[2]

Bowman, W.D., Cleveland, C.C., Halada, Ĺ., Hreško, J., Baron, J.S., 2008. Negative impact of nitrogen deposition on soil buffering capacity. Nature Geoscience1, 767–770.

[3]

Briones, M.J.I., Ostle, N.J., Piearce, T.G., 2008. Stable isotopes reveal that the calciferous gland of earthworms is a CO2-fixing organ. Soil Biology and Biochemistry40, 554–557.

[4]

Chadwick, O.A., Chorover, J., 2001. The chemistry of pedogenic thresholds. Geoderma100, 321–353.

[5]

Chen, C., Xiao, W.Y., Chen, H.Y.H., 2023. Mapping global soil acidification under N deposition. Global Change Biology29, 4652–4661.

[6]

Chen, J.Y., Zhou, Q.J., Ou, Q.X., Chen, S.F., Zhang, J.E., Wei, H., 2025. Effects of sterilization methods on physiochemical properties of lateritic red soil in south China. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis37, 633–642.

[7]

Chen, X., Zhang, J.E., Wei, H., 2020. Physiological responses of earthworm under acid rain stress. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17, 7246.

[8]

China Soil Science Data Center, 2023. Soil Science Database. Nanjing: Nanjing Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences Nanjing.

[9]

Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Eldridge, D.J., Ochoa, V., Gozalo, B., Singh, B.K., Maestre, F.T., 2017. Soil microbial communities drive the resistance of ecosystem multifunctionality to global change in drylands across the globe. Ecology Letters20, 1295–1305.

[10]

Dethier, D.P., Jones, S.B., Feist, T.P., Ricker, J.E., 1988. Relations among sulfate, aluminum, iron, dissolved organic carbon, and pH in upland forest soils of northwestern massachusetts. Soil Science Society of America Journal52, 506–512.

[11]

Ghorbani, M., Amirahmadi, E., 2024. Insights into soil and biochar variations and their contribution to soil aggregate status – A meta-analysis. Soil and Tillage Research244, 106282.

[12]

Gong, X., Wang, D.Y., Xu, M.G., Du, Y., Chen, X.Y., Hu, F., Liu, M.Q., 2023. Earthworm ecotype diversity mitigates resource limitations of microbial community in arable soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry182, 109040.

[13]

Gong, X., Wang, S., Wang, Z.W., Jiang, Y.J., Hu, Z.K., Zheng, Y., Chen, X.Y., Li, H.X., Hu, F., Liu, M.Q., Scheu, S., 2019. Earthworms modify soil bacterial and fungal communities through enhancing aggregation and buffering pH. Geoderma347, 59–69.

[14]

Guo, J.H., Liu, X.J., Zhang, Y., Shen, J.L., Han, W.X., Zhang, W.F., Christie, P., Goulding, K.W.T., Vitousek, P.M., Zhang, F.S., 2010. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science327, 1008–1010.

[15]

He, Y.H., Zhou, X.H., Jiang, L.L., Li, M., Du, Z.G., Zhou, G.Y., Shao, J.J., Wang, X.H., Xu, Z.H., Hosseini Bai, S., Wallace, H., Xu, C.Y., 2017. Effects of biochar application on soil greenhouse gas fluxes: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology Bioenergy9, 743–755.

[16]

Jeffery, S., Verheijen, F.G.A., van der Velde, M., Bastos, A.C., 2011. A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment144, 175–187.

[17]

Jiang, J., Wang, Y.P., Yu, M.X., Cao, N.N., Yan, J.H., 2018. Soil organic matter is important for acid buffering and reducing aluminum leaching from acidic forest soils. Chemical Geology501, 86–94.

[18]

Liu, G.S., 1996. Soil Physicochemical Analysis and Description of Soil Profiles. Beijing: Standards Press of China.

[19]

Liu, S.W., Cen, B.T., Yu, Z.N., Qiu, R.L., Gao, T., Long, X.X., 2025. The key role of biochar in amending acidic soil: reducing soil acidity and improving soil acid buffering capacity. Biochar7, 52.

[20]

Liu, T., Chen, X.Y., Gong, X., Lubbers, I.M., Jiang, Y.Y., Feng, W., Li, X.P., Whalen, J.K., Bonkowski, M., Griffiths, B.S., Hu, F., Liu, M.Q., 2019. Earthworms coordinate soil biota to improve multiple ecosystem functions. Current Biology29, 3420–3429.e5.

[21]

Liu, Z.Q., Liu, Z.X., Wu, L.Z., Li, Y.Z., Wang, J., Wei, H., Zhang, J.E., 2022. Effect of polyethylene microplastics and acid rain on the agricultural soil ecosystem in Southern China. Environmental Pollution303, 119094.

[22]

Lu, X.K., Mo, J.M., Gilliam, F.S., Zhou, G.Y., Fang, Y.T., 2010. Effects of experimental nitrogen additions on plant diversity in an old-growth tropical forest. Global Change Biology16, 2688–2700.

[23]

Luo, W.T., Nelson, P.N., Li, M.H., Cai, J.P., Zhang, Y.Y., Zhang, Y.G., Yang, S., Wang, R.Z., Wang, Z.W., Wu, Y.N., Han, X.G., Jiang, Y., 2015. Contrasting pH buffering patterns in neutral-alkaline soils along a 3600 km transect in northern China. Biogeosciences12, 7047–7056.

[24]

Meng, C., Tian, D.S., Zeng, H., Li, Z.L., Yi, C.X., Niu, S.L., 2019. Global soil acidification impacts on belowground processes. Environmental Research Letters14, 074003.

[25]

Meng, X.C., Zheng, E.N., Hou, D.M., Qin, M.T., Meng, F.X., Chen, P., Qi, Z.J., 2024. The effect of biochar types on carbon cycles in farmland soils: a meta analysis. Science of the Total Environment930, 172623.

[26]

Nelson, P.N., Su, N.H., 2010. Soil pH buffering capacity: a descriptive function and its application to some acidic tropical soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research48, 201–207.

[27]

Raza, S., Miao, N., Wang, P.Z., Ju, X.T., Chen, Z.J., Zhou, J.B., Kuzyakov, Y., 2020. Dramatic loss of inorganic carbon by nitrogen-induced soil acidification in Chinese croplands. Global Change Biology26, 3738–3751.

[28]

Reich, P.B., Oleksyn, J., Modrzynski, J., Mrozinski, P., Hobbie, S.E., Eissenstat, D.M., Chorover, J., Chadwick, O.A., Hale, C.M., Tjoelker, M.G., 2005. Linking litter calcium, earthworms and soil properties: a common garden test with 14 tree species. Ecology Letters8, 811–818.

[29]

Rousk, J., Bååth, E., Brookes, P.C., Lauber, C.L., Lozupone, C., Caporaso, J.G., Knight, R., Fierer, N., 2010. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. The ISME Journal4, 1340–1351.

[30]

Shi, R.Y., Hong, Z.N., Li, J.Y., Jiang, J., Baquy, M.A.A., Xu, R.K., Qian, W., 2017. Mechanisms for increasing the pH buffering capacity of an acidic ultisol by crop residue-derived biochars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry65, 8111–8119.

[31]

Shi, R.Y., Hong, Z.N., Li, J.Y., Jiang, J., Kamran, M.A., Xu, R.K., Qian, W., 2018. Peanut straw biochar increases the resistance of two Ultisols derived from different parent materials to acidification: a mechanism study. Journal of Environmental Management210, 171–179.

[32]

Shi, Z., Weiner, J., Cavalieri, A., Liu, H.Y., Li, T.P., Cai, J.P., Jiang, Y., 2021a. The interaction between N and P addition on grassland soil acid buffering capacity is regulated by precipitation. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition67, 222–232.

[33]

Shi, Z.J., Zhang, J.E., Xiao, Z.H., Lu, T.T., Ren, X.Q., Wei, H., 2021b. Effects of acid rain on plant growth: a meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Management297, 113213.

[34]

Trubetskaya, O.E., Richard, C., Patsaeva, S.V., Trubetskoj, O.A., 2020. Evaluation of aliphatic/aromatic compounds and fluorophores in dissolved organic matter of contrasting natural waters by SEC-HPLC with multi-wavelength absorbance and fluorescence detections. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy238, 118450.

[35]

Ulrich, B., 1983. Soil acidity and its relations to acid deposition. In: Proceedings of the A Workshop Held at Göttingen Effects of Accumulation of Air Pollutants in Forest Ecosystems. Dordrecht: Springer, 127–146.

[36]

Ulrich, B., Matzner, E., 1986. Anthropogenic and natural acidification in terrestrial ecosystems. Experientia42, 344–350.

[37]

van Breemen, N., Burrough, P.A., Velthorst, E.J., van Dobben, H.F., de Wit, T., Ridder, T.B., Reijnders, H.F.R., 1982. Soil acidification from atmospheric ammonium sulphate in forest canopy throughfall. Nature299, 548–550.

[38]

Wang, J., Shi, L., Zhang, X.Z., Zhao, X., Zhong, K.C., Wang, S.X., Zou, J.W., Shen, Z.G., Chen, Y.H., 2019. Earthworm activities weaken the immobilizing effect of biochar as amendment for metal polluted soils. Science of the Total Environment696, 133729.

[39]

Wei, H., Bai, W.J., Zhang, J.E., Chen, R., Xiang, H.M., Quan, G.M., 2019. Integrated rice-duck farming decreases soil seed bank and weed density in a paddy field. Agronomy9, 259.

[40]

Wei, H., Shan, X.R., Wu, L.Z., Zhang, J.E., Saleem, M., Yang, J.Y., Liu, Z.Q., Chen, X., 2023. Microbial cell membrane properties and intracellular metabolism regulate individual level microbial responses to acid stress. Soil Biology and Biochemistry177, 108883.

[41]

Wei, H., Yang, J.Y., Liu, Z.Q., Zhang, J.E., 2022. Data integration analysis indicates that soil texture and pH greatly influence the acid buffering capacity of global surface soils. Sustainability14, 3017.

[42]

Wei, H., Zhang, K., Zhang, J.E., Li, D.F., Zhang, Y., Xiang, H.M., 2018. Grass cultivation alters soil organic carbon fractions in a subtropical orchard of southern China. Soil and Tillage Research181, 110–116.

[43]

Xu, R.K., Zhao, A.Z., Yuan, J.H., Jiang, J., 2012. pH buffering capacity of acid soils from tropical and subtropical regions of China as influenced by incorporation of crop straw biochars. Journal of Soils and Sediments12, 494–502.

[44]

Xu, W.H., Xu, H.M., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Gundale, M.J., Zou, X.M., Ruan, H.H., 2023. Global meta-analysis reveals positive effects of biochar on soil microbial diversity. Geoderma436, 116528.

[45]

Yang, J.Y., Wei, H., Zhang, J.E., Shi, Z.J., Li, H.R., Ye, Y.Q., Abdo, A.I., 2022. Land use and soil type exert strongly interactive impacts on the pH buffering capacity of acidic soils in South China. Sustainability14, 12891.

[46]

Yin, J.H., Chen, H.H., Duan, P.P., Zhu, K., Li, N.H., Ma, Y., Xu, Y.M., Guo, J.H., Liu, R., Chen, Q., 2023. Soil microbial communities as potential regulators of N2O sources in highly acidic soils. Soil Ecology Letters5, 230178.

[47]

Yu, Z.P., Chen, H.Y.H., Searle, E.B., Sardans, J., Ciais, P., Peñuelas, J., Huang, Z.Q., 2020. Whole soil acidification and base cation reduction across subtropical China. Geoderma361, 114107.

[48]

Zhang, Q.Y., Zhu, J.X., Wang, Q.F., Xu, L., Li, M.X., Dai, G.H., Mulder, J., Xi, Y., He, N.P., 2022. Soil acidification in China's forests due to atmospheric acid deposition from 1980 to 2050. Science Bulletin67, 914–917.

[49]

Zhang, X.M., Guo, J.H., Vogt, R.D., Mulder, J., Wang, Y.J., Qian, C., Wang, J.G., Zhang, X.S., 2020. Soil acidification as an additional driver to organic carbon accumulation in major Chinese croplands. Geoderma366, 114234.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (2215KB)

338

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/