Legacy effects of invasive plant species on soil bacterial community assembly, β-diversity, and ecological interactions
Pantelitsa Kapagianni , Magdi Mola , Spiros Papakostas , Nikos Monokrousos , George Pericles Stamou , Effimia Michael Papatheodorou
Soil Ecology Letters ›› 2025, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (3) : 250321
Legacy effects of invasive plant species on soil bacterial community assembly, β-diversity, and ecological interactions
Invasions of exotic plant species pose a serious threat to local biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, with their effects on soil persisting even after removal. In a mesocosm experiment, we investigated the impact of two alien species, Conyza bonariensis (annual) and Solanum elaeagnifolium (perennial) on soil bacterial community after one year of growth (conditioning sampling), and their legacy effects on the bacterial community developed during the subsequent growth of a native grass species, Cichorium intybus (legacy sampling). We assessed the effects of these species by analysing soil enzymatic activity, bacterial community biomass and structure, β-diversity and the co-occurrence patterns of microbial members. Plant identity did not affect enzymatic activity, bacterial biomass and community composition. The communities across all treatments were dominated by the phylum Firmicutes particularly the Bacillus genus. The heterogeneity in the composition of bacterial communities between treatments (β-diversity) was higher at conditioning compared to legacy sampling while the niche width of the bacterial members expanded after C. intybus growth. β-diversity in soils with S. elaeagnifolium legacy was mainly driven by stochastic processes such as ecological or genetic drift while in soils with C. bonarienzis legacy, deterministic processes like environmental filtering played a dominant role. Regulation of microbial co-occurrence patterns was nearly equally influenced by stochastic and deterministic processes. However, the legacy effects of the invaders significantly impacted the robustness of bacterial networks to further disturbance, with the networks in C. bonarienzis exhibiting enhanced robustness. Our results suggest divergent management strategies for these two species: precautionary containment for S. elaeagnifolium vs. direct intervention for C. bonariensis.
rank abundance models / S. elaeagnifolium / C. bonarienzis / soil enzyme activity / PLFAs
| ● No invasive-specific effects on bacterial community composition and biomass. | |
| ● The identity of invaders’ legacy impacted the robustness of bacterial networks. | |
| ● Legacy of C. bonarienzis exerts strong filtering effect on soil bacterial β-diversity. | |
| ● S. elaeagnifolium legacy promotes the stochastic regulation of bacterial β-diversity. |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. available at the website of bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk. |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
Bezemer, T.M., Lawson, C.S., Hedlund, K., Edwards, .AR., Brook, A.J., Igual, J.M., Mortimer, S.R., van der Putten, W.H., 2006. Plant species and functional group effects on abiotic and microbial soil properties and plant–soil feedback responses in two grasslands. Journal of Ecology 94, 893–904. |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Jabot, F., Etienne, R.S., Chave, J., 2008. Reconciling neutral assemblage models and environmental filtering: theory and an empirical test. Oikos 117, 1308–1320. |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
Luo, X., Han, S., Fu, X., Li, X., Wang, L., Peng, S., Chen, W., Huang, Q., 2019. The microbial network in naturally fertile paddy soil possibly facilitates functional recruitment in the rice mature stage. Applied Soil Ecology 135, 174–181. |
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
The Author(s) 2025. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn
Supplementary files
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |