Comparing the temperature sensitivity of organic matter decomposition in oxic and oxygen-deprived soils

Zhenhui Jiang , Xin Wang , Ting Liu , Xiaojuan Feng

Soil Ecology Letters ›› 2024, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 230189

PDF (1745KB)
Soil Ecology Letters ›› 2024, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 230189 DOI: 10.1007/s42832-023-0189-z
RAPID REPORT
RAPID REPORT

Comparing the temperature sensitivity of organic matter decomposition in oxic and oxygen-deprived soils

Author information +
History +
PDF (1745KB)

Abstract

● No consistent variation was found in soil respiration Q10 under various O2 conditions.

● Substrate C quality had a strong effect on Q10 in oxic soils.

● N limitation had a large impact on Q10 in soils under O2 limitation.

Current studies on the temperature sensitivity (Q10) of soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition mainly focus on aerobic conditions. However, variations and determinants of Q10 in oxygen (O2)-deprived soils remain unclear. Here we incubated three grassland soils under oxic, suboxic, and anoxic conditions subjected to varying temperatures to compare variations in Q10 in relation to changing substrates. No consistent variation was found in Q10 under various O2 conditions. Further analysis of edaphic properties demonstrated that substrate carbon quality showed a strong influence on Q10 in oxic soils, whereas nitrogen limitation played a more important role in suboxic and anoxic soils. These results suggest that substrate carbon quality and nitrogen limitation may play roles of varying importance in determining the temperature sensitivity of SOM decomposition under various O2 conditions.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

oxygen-limited conditions / temperature sensitivity / soil respiration / carbon substrate / nitrogen limitation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhenhui Jiang, Xin Wang, Ting Liu, Xiaojuan Feng. Comparing the temperature sensitivity of organic matter decomposition in oxic and oxygen-deprived soils. Soil Ecology Letters, 2024, 6(1): 230189 DOI:10.1007/s42832-023-0189-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bosatta, E., Ågren, G.I., 1999. Soil organic matter quality interpreted thermodynamically. Soil Biology & Biochemistry31, 1889–1891.

[2]

Butterbach-Bahl, K., Baggs, E.M., Dannenmann, M., Kiese, R., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., 2013. Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences368, 20130122.

[3]

Chen, X., Tang, J., Jiang, L., Li, B., Chen, J., Fang C., 2010. Evaluating the impacts of incubation procedures on estimated Q10 values of soil respiration. Soil Biology & Biochemistry42, 2282–2288.

[4]

Ding, J., Chen, L., Zhang, B., Liu, L., Yang, G., Fang, K., Chen, Y., Li, F., Kou, D., Ji, C., Luo, Y., Yang, Y. 2016. Linking temperature sensitivity of soil CO2 release to substrate, environmental, and microbial properties across alpine ecosystems. Global Biogeochemical Cycles30, 1310–1323.

[5]

Fang, C., Smith, P., Moncrieff, J.B., Smith J.U., 2005. Similar response of labile and resistant soil organic matter pools to changes in temperature. Nature433, 57–59.

[6]

Gershenson, A., Bader, N.E., Cheng, W., 2009. Effects of substrate availability on the temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition. Global Change Biology15, 176–183.

[7]

Liu, Y., He, N., Wen, X., Yu, G., Gao, Y., Jia, Y., 2016. Patterns and regulating mechanisms of soil nitrogen mineralization and temperature sensitivity in Chinese terrestrial ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment215, 40–46.

[8]

Moorhead, D.L., Lashermes, G., Sinsabaugh, R.L., 2012. A theoretical model of C- and N-acquiring exoenzyme activities, which balances microbial demands during decomposition. Soil Biology & Biochemistry53, 133–141.

[9]

Olander, L., Vitousek, P., 2000. Regulation of soil phosphatase and chitinase activity by N and P availability. Biogeochemistry49, 175–190.

[10]

Sakurai, G., Jomura, M., Yonemura, S., Iizumi, T., Shirato, Y., Yokozawa, M., 2012. Inversely estimating temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition by assimilating a turnover model and long-term field data. Soil Biology & Biochemistry46, 191–199.

[11]

van Gestel, N., Shi, Z., van Groenigen, K.J., Osenberg, C.W., Andresen, L.C., Dukes, J.S., Hovenden, M.J., Luo, Y., Michelsen, A., Pendall, E., Reich, P.B., Schuur, E.A.G., Hungate, B.A., 2018. Predicting soil carbon loss with warming. Nature554, E4–E5.

[12]

Walker, T.W.N., Kaiser, C., Strasser, F., Herbold, C.W., Leblans, N.I.W., Woebken, D., Janssens, I.A., Sigurdsson, B.D., Richter, A., 2018. Microbial temperature sensitivity and biomass change explain soil carbon loss with warming. Nature Climate Change8, 885–889.

[13]

Wang, Y., Wang, H., He, J.S., Feng, X., 2017. Iron-mediated soil carbon response to water-table decline an alpine wetland. Nature Communications8, 15972.

[14]

Yang, W., Weber, K., Silver, W., 2012. Nitrogen loss from soil through anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to iron reduction. Nature Geoscience5, 538–541.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1745KB)

Supplementary files

SEL-00189-OF-XJF_suppl_1

1523

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/