Comparing the temperature sensitivity of organic matter decomposition in oxic and oxygen-deprived soils

Zhenhui Jiang, Xin Wang, Ting Liu, Xiaojuan Feng

PDF(1745 KB)
PDF(1745 KB)
Soil Ecology Letters ›› 2024, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 230189. DOI: 10.1007/s42832-023-0189-z
RAPID REPORT
RAPID REPORT

Comparing the temperature sensitivity of organic matter decomposition in oxic and oxygen-deprived soils

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● No consistent variation was found in soil respiration Q10 under various O2 conditions.

● Substrate C quality had a strong effect on Q10 in oxic soils.

● N limitation had a large impact on Q10 in soils under O2 limitation.

Abstract

Current studies on the temperature sensitivity (Q10) of soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition mainly focus on aerobic conditions. However, variations and determinants of Q10 in oxygen (O2)-deprived soils remain unclear. Here we incubated three grassland soils under oxic, suboxic, and anoxic conditions subjected to varying temperatures to compare variations in Q10 in relation to changing substrates. No consistent variation was found in Q10 under various O2 conditions. Further analysis of edaphic properties demonstrated that substrate carbon quality showed a strong influence on Q10 in oxic soils, whereas nitrogen limitation played a more important role in suboxic and anoxic soils. These results suggest that substrate carbon quality and nitrogen limitation may play roles of varying importance in determining the temperature sensitivity of SOM decomposition under various O2 conditions.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

oxygen-limited conditions / temperature sensitivity / soil respiration / carbon substrate / nitrogen limitation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhenhui Jiang, Xin Wang, Ting Liu, Xiaojuan Feng. Comparing the temperature sensitivity of organic matter decomposition in oxic and oxygen-deprived soils. Soil Ecology Letters, 2024, 6(1): 230189 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42832-023-0189-z

References

[1]
Bosatta, E., Ågren, G.I., 1999. Soil organic matter quality interpreted thermodynamically. Soil Biology & Biochemistry31, 1889–1891.
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Butterbach-Bahl, K., Baggs, E.M., Dannenmann, M., Kiese, R., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., 2013. Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences368, 20130122.
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Chen, X., Tang, J., Jiang, L., Li, B., Chen, J., Fang C., 2010. Evaluating the impacts of incubation procedures on estimated Q10 values of soil respiration. Soil Biology & Biochemistry42, 2282–2288.
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Ding, J., Chen, L., Zhang, B., Liu, L., Yang, G., Fang, K., Chen, Y., Li, F., Kou, D., Ji, C., Luo, Y., Yang, Y. 2016. Linking temperature sensitivity of soil CO2 release to substrate, environmental, and microbial properties across alpine ecosystems. Global Biogeochemical Cycles30, 1310–1323.
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Fang, C., Smith, P., Moncrieff, J.B., Smith J.U., 2005. Similar response of labile and resistant soil organic matter pools to changes in temperature. Nature433, 57–59.
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Gershenson, A., Bader, N.E., Cheng, W., 2009. Effects of substrate availability on the temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition. Global Change Biology15, 176–183.
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Liu, Y., He, N., Wen, X., Yu, G., Gao, Y., Jia, Y., 2016. Patterns and regulating mechanisms of soil nitrogen mineralization and temperature sensitivity in Chinese terrestrial ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment215, 40–46.
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Moorhead, D.L., Lashermes, G., Sinsabaugh, R.L., 2012. A theoretical model of C- and N-acquiring exoenzyme activities, which balances microbial demands during decomposition. Soil Biology & Biochemistry53, 133–141.
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Olander, L., Vitousek, P., 2000. Regulation of soil phosphatase and chitinase activity by N and P availability. Biogeochemistry49, 175–190.
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Sakurai, G., Jomura, M., Yonemura, S., Iizumi, T., Shirato, Y., Yokozawa, M., 2012. Inversely estimating temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition by assimilating a turnover model and long-term field data. Soil Biology & Biochemistry46, 191–199.
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
van Gestel, N., Shi, Z., van Groenigen, K.J., Osenberg, C.W., Andresen, L.C., Dukes, J.S., Hovenden, M.J., Luo, Y., Michelsen, A., Pendall, E., Reich, P.B., Schuur, E.A.G., Hungate, B.A., 2018. Predicting soil carbon loss with warming. Nature554, E4–E5.
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Walker, T.W.N., Kaiser, C., Strasser, F., Herbold, C.W., Leblans, N.I.W., Woebken, D., Janssens, I.A., Sigurdsson, B.D., Richter, A., 2018. Microbial temperature sensitivity and biomass change explain soil carbon loss with warming. Nature Climate Change8, 885–889.
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Wang, Y., Wang, H., He, J.S., Feng, X., 2017. Iron-mediated soil carbon response to water-table decline an alpine wetland. Nature Communications8, 15972.
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Yang, W., Weber, K., Silver, W., 2012. Nitrogen loss from soil through anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to iron reduction. Nature Geoscience5, 538–541.
CrossRef Google scholar

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2019YFA0607303) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42107315).

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s42832-023-0189-z and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1745 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/