Erosion effects on soil microbial carbon use efficiency in the mollisol cropland in northeast China

Xuebing Zhang, Guangting Pei, Tianyu Zhang, Xianlei Fan, Ziping Liu, Edith Bai

PDF(928 KB)
PDF(928 KB)
Soil Ecology Letters ›› 2023, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 230176. DOI: 10.1007/s42832-023-0176-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Erosion effects on soil microbial carbon use efficiency in the mollisol cropland in northeast China

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● Soil erosion decreased soil microbial CUE and increased microbial uptake of carbon.

● Soil erosion decreased microbial CUE by decreasing substrate C, N and MBC and increasing soil pH.

● Soil microbes had to increase their uptake rate to cope with the loss of substrates with increasing erosion rate.

● Soil microbial respiration increased with increasing degree of erosion.

● Soil microbial growth rate remained relative stable under different degrees of soil erosion.

● Microbial CUE in soil surface was less responsive to erosion than that in deeper soil.

Abstract

Soil microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE) is an important synthetic parameter of microbial community metabolism and is commonly used to quantify the partitioning of carbon (C) between microbial growth and respiration. However, it remains unclear how microbial CUE responds to different degrees of soil erosion in mollisol cropland. Therefore, we investigated the responses of soil erosion on microbial CUE, growth and respiration to different soil erosion rates in a mollisol cropland in northeast China based on a substrate independent method (18O-H2O labeling). Soils were sampled at four positions along a down-slope transect: summit, shoulder, back and foot. We found microbial CUE decreased significantly with increasing soil erosion rate in 5−20 cm soil, but did not change in 0−5 cm. The decrease of microbial CUE in subsoil was because microbes increased C uptake and allocated higher uptake C to microbial basal respiration with increasing soil erosion rate. Microbial respiration increased significantly with soil erosion rate, probably due to the more disturbance and unbalanced stoichiometry. Furthermore, soil microbes in surface soil were able to maintain their growth rates with increasing degree of erosion. Altogether, our results indicated that soil erosion could decrease microbial CUE by affecting soil physical and chemical properties, resulting in more decomposition of soil organic matter and more soil respiration, which had negative feedbacks to soil C sequestration and climate changes in cropland soil.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

soil organic carbon / soil erosion / microbial carbon use efficiency / growth rate / respiration

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xuebing Zhang, Guangting Pei, Tianyu Zhang, Xianlei Fan, Ziping Liu, Edith Bai. Erosion effects on soil microbial carbon use efficiency in the mollisol cropland in northeast China. Soil Ecology Letters, 2023, 5(4): 230176 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42832-023-0176-4

References

[1]
Agumas, B., Blagodatsky, S., Balume, I., Musyoki, M.K., Marhan, S., Rasche, F., 2021. Microbial carbon use efficiency during plant residue decomposition: Integrating multi-enzyme stoichiometry and C balance approach. Applied Soil Ecology159, 103820.
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Ball, B.C., 2013. Soil structure and greenhouse gas emissions: a synthesis of 20 years of experimentation. European Journal of Soil Science64, 357–373.
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Bardgett, R.D., van der Putten, W.H., 2014. Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature515, 505–511.
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Barnett, S.E., Youngblut, N.D., Koechli, C.N., Buckley, D.H., 2021. Multisubstrate DNA stable isotope probing reveals guild structure of bacteria that mediate soil carbon cycling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America118, e2115292118.
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Bonner, M.T.L., Shoo, L.P., Brackin, R., Schmidt, S., 2018. Relationship between microbial composition and substrate use efficiency in tropical soil. Geoderma315, 96–103.
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Brookes, P.C., Landman, A., Pruden, G., Jenkinson, D.S., 1985. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry17, 837–842.
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Burke, W., Gabriels, D., Bouma, J. 1986. Soil Structure Assessment. A. A. BalkemaPublishers, Rotterdam. Netherlandsp.92.
[8]
Camenzind, T., Philipp Grenz, K., Lehmann, J., Rillig, M.C., 2021. Soil fungal mycelia have unexpectedly flexible stoichiometric C:N and C:P ratios. Ecology Letters24, 208–218.
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Crowther, T.W., van den Hoogen, J., Wan, J., Mayes, M.A., Keiser, A.D., Mo, L., Averill, C., Maynard, D.S., 2019. The global soil community and its influence on biogeochemistry. Science365, 772.
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
del Giorgio, P.A., Cole, J.J., 1998. Bacterial growth efficiency in natural aquatic systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics29, 503–541.
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Maestre, F.T., Reich, P.B., Jeffries, T.C., Gaitan, J.J., Encinar, D., Berdugo, M., Campbell, C.D., Singh, B.K., 2016. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nature Communications7, 10541.
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Domeignoz-Horta, L.A., Pold, G., Liu, X.J.A., Frey, S.D., Melillo, J.M., DeAngelis, K.M., 2020. Microbial diversity drives carbon use efficiency in a model soil. Nature Communications11, 3684.
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Dungait, J.A.J., Ghee, C., Rowan, J.S., McKenzie, B.M., Hawes, C., Dixon, E.R., Paterson, E., Hopkins, D.W., 2013. Microbial responses to the erosional redistribution of soil organic carbon in arable fields. Soil Biology & Biochemistry60, 195–201.
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Ekschmitt, K., Liu, M.Q., Vetter, S., Fox, O., Wolters, V 2005. Strategies used by soil biota to overcome soil organic matter stability - why is dead organic matter left over in the soil?. Geoderma128, 167–176.
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Fang, H., Sun, L., 2017. Modelling soil erosion and its response to the soil conservation measures in the black soil catchment, Northeastern China. Soil & Tillage Research165, 23–33.
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Fang, H., Sun, L., Qi, D., Cai, Q., 2012. Using Cs-137 technique to quantify soil erosion and deposition rates in an agricultural catchment in the black soil region, Northeast China. Geomorphology169, 142–150.
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Fang, H.J., Cheng, S.L., Zhang, X.P., Liang, A.Z., Yang, X.M., Drury, C.F., 2006. Impact of soil redistribution in a sloping landscape on carbon sequestration in Northeast China. Land Degradation & Development17, 89–96.
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Frey, S.D., Lee, J., Melillo, J.M., Six, J., 2013. The temperature response of soil microbial efficiency and its feedback to climate. Nature Climate Change3, 395–398.
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Frostegard, A., Baath, E., Tunlid, A., 1993. Shifts in the structure of soil microbial communities in limed forests as revealed by phospholipid fatty-acid analysis. Soil Biology & Biochemistry25, 723–730.
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Gee, G.W., Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I: Physical and Mineralogical Methods. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. and Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA383–411.
[21]
Gobin, A., Jones, R., Kirkby, M., Campling, P., Govers, G., Kosmas, C., Gentile, A.R., 2004. Indicators for pan-European assessment and monitoring of soil erosion by water. Environmental Science & Policy7, 25–38.
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Heckrath, G., Djurhuus, J., Quine, T.A., Van Oost, K., Govers, G., Zhang, Y., 2005. Tillage erosion and its effect on soil properties and crop yield in Denmark. Journal of Environmental Quality34, 312–324.
[23]
Hogberg, M.N., Hogberg, P., Myrold, D.D 2007. Is microbial community composition in boreal forest soils determined by pH, C-to-N ratio, the trees, or all three?. Oecologia150, 590–601.
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Huang, J., Li, Z., Zeng, G., Zhang, J., Li, J., Nie, X., Ma, W., Zhang, X., 2013. Microbial responses to simulated water erosion in relation to organic carbon dynamics on a hilly cropland in subtropical China. Ecological Engineering60, 67–75.
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Islam, M.R., Singh, B., Dijkstra, F.A., 2023. Microbial carbon use efficiency of glucose varies with soil clay content: A meta-analysis. Applied Soil Ecology181, 104636.
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Jobbágy, E.G., Jackson, R.B., 2000. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecological Applications10, 423–436.
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Jones, D.L., Cooledge, E.C., Hoyle, F.C., Griffiths, R.I., Murphy, D.V., 2019. pH and exchangeable aluminum are major regulators of microbial energy flow and carbon use efficiency in soil microbial communities. Soil Biology & Biochemistry138, 107584.
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Kamali, N., Siroosi, H., Sadeghipour, A., 2020. Impacts of wind erosion and seasonal changes on soil carbon dioxide emission in southwestern Iran. Journal of Arid Land12, 690–700.
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Kong, W., Su, F., Zhang, Q., Ishii, S., Sadowsky, M.J., Banerjee, S., Shao, M., Qiu, L., Wei, X., 2022. Erosion and deposition divergently affect the structure of soil bacterial communities and functionality. Catena209, 105805.
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Kumar, R., Pandey, S., Pandey, A., 2006. Plant roots and carbon sequestration. Current Science7, 885–890.
[31]
Lal, R., 2004. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science304, 1623–1627.
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Lal, R., 2018. Digging deeper: A holistic perspective of factors affecting soil organic carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Global Change Biology24, 3285–3301.
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Lal, R., Pimentel, D 2008. Soil erosion: A carbon sink or source?. Science319, 1040–1042.
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Li, J., Chen, L., Zhang, J., Zhou, Y., 2019a. Relationship between soil organic carbon and microbial community in lime concrete black soil. Soils51, 488–494.
[35]
Li, J., Sang, C., Yang, J., Qu, L., Xia, Z., Sun, H., Jiang, P., Wang, X., He, H., Wang, C., 2021. Stoichiometric imbalance and microbial community regulate microbial elements use efficiencies under nitrogen addition. Soil Biology & Biochemistry156, 108207.
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Li, T., Zhang, H., Wang, X., Cheng, S., Fang, H., Liu, G., Yuan, W., 2019b. Soil erosion affects variations of soil organic carbon and soil respiration along a slope in Northeast China. Ecological Processes8, 28.
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Li, Z., Nie, X., Chang, X., Liu, L., Sun, L., 2016. Characteristics of soil and organic carbon loss induced by water erosion on the Loess Plateau in China. PLoS One11, e0154591.
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Liang, C., Schimel, J.P., Jastrow, J.D., 2017. The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nature Microbiology2, 17105.
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Manzoni, S., Taylor, P., Richter, A., Porporato, A., Agren, G.I., 2012. Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. New Phytologist196, 79–91.
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Minasny, B., Malone, B.P., McBratney, A.B., Angers, D.A., Arrouays, D., Chambers, A., Chaplot, V., Chen, Z.S., Cheng, K., Das, B.S., Field, D.J., Gimona, A., Hedley, C.B., Hong, S.Y., Mandal, B., Marchant, B.P., Martin, M., McConkey, B.G., Mulder, V.L., O’Rourke, S., Richer-de-Forges, A.C., Odeh, I., Padarian, J., Paustian, K., Pan, G.X., Poggio, L., Savin, I., Stolbovoy, V., Stockmann, U., Sulaeman, Y., Tsui, C.C., Vagen, T.G., van Wesemael, B., Winowiecki, L., 2017. Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma292, 59–86.
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Montgomery, D.R., 2007. Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America104, 13268–13272.
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Nev, O.A., Lindsay, R.J., Jepson, A., Butt, L., Beardmore, R.E., Gudelj, I., 2021. Predicting microbial growth dynamics in response to nutrient availability. PLoS Computational Biology17, e1008817.
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Nie, X.J., Zhao, T.Q., Qiao, X.N., 2013. Impacts of soil erosion on organic carbon and nutrient dynamics in an alpine grassland soil. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition59, 660–668.
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Niu, X.Y., Wang, Y.H., Yang, H., Zheng, J.W., Zou, J., Xu, M.N., Wu, S.S., Xie, B., 2015. Effect of land use on soil erosion and nutrients in Dianchi Lake Watershed, China. Pedosphere25, 103–111.
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Oquist, M.G., Erhagen, B., Haei, M., Sparrman, T., Ilstedt, U., Schleucher, J., Nilsson, M.B., 2017. The effect of temperature and substrate quality on the carbon use efficiency of saprotrophic decomposition. Plant and Soil414, 113–125.
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Park, J.H., Meusburger, K., Jang, I., Kang, H., Alewell, C., 2014. Erosion-induced changes in soil biogeochemical and microbiological properties in Swiss Alpine grasslands. Soil Biology & Biochemistry69, 382–392.
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Paterson, E., Thornton, B., Midwood, A.J., Osborne, S.M., Sim, A., Millard, P., 2008. Atmospheric CO2 enrichment and nutrient additions to planted soil increase mineralisation of soil organic matter, but do not alter microbial utilisation of plant- and soil C-sources. Soil Biology & Biochemistry40, 2434–2440.
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Pimentel, D., Harvey, C., Resosudarmo, P., Sinclair, K., Kurz, D., McNair, M., Crist, S., Shpritz, L., Fitton, L., Saffouri, R., Blair, R., 1995. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science267, 1117–1123.
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Polyakov, V.O., Lal, R., 2004. Soil erosion and carbon dynamics under simulated rainfall. Soil Science169, 590–599.
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Qiu, L., Zhang, Q., Zhu, H., Reich, P.B., Banerjee, S., van der Heijden, M.G.A., Sadowsky, M.J., Ishii, S., Jia, X., Shao, M., Liu, B., Jiao, H., Li, H., Wei, X., 2021. Erosion reduces soil microbial diversity, network complexity and multifunctionality. ISME Journal15, 2474–2489.
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Rousk, J., Baath, E., Brookes, P.C., Lauber, C.L., Lozupone, C., Caporaso, J.G., Knight, R., Fierer, N., 2010. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME Journal4, 1340–1351.
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Rousk, J., Brookes, P.C., Baath, E., 2009. Contrasting soil pH effects on fungal and bacterial growth suggest functional redundancy in carbon mineralization. Applied and Environmental Microbiology75, 1589–1596.
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Saleem, M., Hu, J., Jousset, A., 2019. More than the Sum of Its Parts: Microbiome Biodiversity as a Driver of Plant Growth and Soil Health. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics50, 611–624.
[54]
Scharlemann, J.P., Tanner, E.V., Hiederer, R., Kapos, V., 2014. Global soil carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool. Carbon Management5, 81–91.
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Schimel, J.P., Weintraub, M.N., 2003. The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biology & Biochemistry35, 549–563.
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Schlesinger, W.H., Andrews, J.A., 2000. Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry48, 7–20.
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Silva-Sanchez, A., Soares, M., Rousk, J., 2019. Testing the dependence of microbial growth and carbon use efficiency on nitrogen availability, pH, and organic matter quality. Soil Biology & Biochemistry134, 25–35.
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Spohn, M., Klaus, K., Wanek, W., Richter, A., 2016a. Microbial carbon use efficiency and biomass turnover times depending on soil depth - implications for carbon cycling. Soil Biology & Biochemistry96, 74–81.
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Spohn, M., Poetsch, E.M., Eichorst, S.A., Woebken, D., Wanek, W., Richter, A., 2016b. Soil microbial carbon use efficiency and biomass turnover in a long-term fertilization experiment in a temperate grassland. Soil Biology & Biochemistry97, 168–175.
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Uritskiy, G., Getsin, S., Munn, A., Gomez-Silva, B., Davila, A., Glass, B., Taylor, J., DiRuggiero, J., 2019. Halophilic microbial community compositional shift after a rare rainfall in the Atacama Desert. ISME Journal13, 2737–2749.
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Vance, E.D., Brookes, P.C., Jenkinson, D.S., 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology & Biochemistry19, 703–707.
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Wall, D.H., Nielsen, U.N., Six, J., 2015. Soil biodiversity and human health. Nature528, 69–76.
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Wang, C., Qu, L., Yang, L., Liu, D., Morrissey, E., Miao, R., Liu, Z., Wang, Q., Fang, Y., Bai, E., 2021. Large-scale importance of microbial carbon use efficiency and necromass to soil organic carbon. Global Change Biology27, 2039–2048.
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Wang, X., Cui, Y., Wang, Y., Duan, C., Niu, Y., Sun, R., Shen, Y., Guo, X., Fang, L., 2022. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry reveals phosphorus addition alleviates microbial nutrient limitation and promotes soil carbon sequestration in agricultural ecosystems. Journal of Soils and Sediments22, 536–546.
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Wang, Y., Sun, Y., Niu, F., Wu, Q., 2017. Using Cs-137 measurements to investigate the impact of soil erosion on soil nutrients in alpine meadows within the Yangtze River region, China. Cold Regions Science and Technology135, 28–33.
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Wei, S., Zhang, X., McLaughlin, N.B., Chen, X., Jia, S., Liang, A., 2017. Impact of soil water erosion processes on catchment export of soil aggregates and associated SOC. Geoderma294, 63–69.
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Wu, J., Joergensen, R.G., Pommerening, B., Chaussod, R., Brookes, P.C., 1990. Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation extraction−an automated procedure. Soil Biology & Biochemistry22, 1167–1169.
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Xiao, H., Li, Z., Chang, X., Huang, J., Nie, X., Liu, C., Liu, L., Wang, D., Dong, Y., Jiang, J., 2017. Soil erosion-related dynamics of soil bacterial communities and microbial respiration. Applied Soil Ecology119, 205–213.
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Yan, B., Tang, J., 2004. Study on reference Cesium-137 inventory of black soil in Northeast China. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 18, 33–36
[70]
Yang, X.M., Zhang, X.P., Deng, W., Fang, H.J., 2003. Black soil degradation by rainfall erosion in Jilin, China. Land Degradation & Development14, 409–420.
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Yang, Y., Shi, Y., Fang, J., Chu, H., Adams, J.M., 2022. Soil microbial network complexity varies with pH as a continuum, not a threshold, across the North China Plain. Frontiers in Microbiology13, 895687.
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Zhang, K., Chen, L., Li, Y., Brookes, P.C., Xu, J., Luo, Y., 2020. Interactive effects of soil pH and substrate quality on microbial utilization. European Journal of Soil Biology96, 96.
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Zhang, X.B., Walling, D.E., He, Q., 1999. Simplified mass balance models for assessing soil erosion rates on cultivated land using caesium-137 measurements. Hydrological Sciences Journal44, 33–45.
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Zheng, Q., Hu, Y., Zhang, S., Noll, L., Boeckle, T., Richter, A., Wanek, W., 2019. Growth explains microbial carbon use efficiency across soils differing in land use and geology. Soil Biology & Biochemistry128, 45–55.
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2022YFF1300501) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41971058).

Author contributions

Edith Bai, Tianyu Zhang and Xuebing Zhang designed the research. Edith Bai and Xuebing Zhang jointly wrote the manuscript. Edith Bai, Xuebing Zhang and Guangting Pei jointly analyzed the data. Tianyu Zhang, Xianlei Fan and Ziping Liu performed experiments and conducted fieldwork.

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(928 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/