Use of flue gas desulfurization gypsum to reduce dissolved phosphorus in runoff and leachate from two agricultural soils

Yumei Mao, Xiaoping Li, Warren A. Dick, Linkui Cao

PDF(2782 KB)
PDF(2782 KB)
Soil Ecology Letters ›› 2023, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 128-136. DOI: 10.1007/s42832-022-0135-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Use of flue gas desulfurization gypsum to reduce dissolved phosphorus in runoff and leachate from two agricultural soils

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● Gypsum can effectively decrease dissolved P loss via runoff and leachate from the areas with high soil P levels by increasing P uptake by ryegrass.

● Both surface application and mixing of gypsum into the topsoil reduced dissolved P losses.

● The effect of gypsum application method on dissolved P losses varied by soil texture.

● Flue gas desulfurization gypsum did not affect ryegrass biomass and also didn’t increase the accumulation of trace elements in soil and ryegrass.

Abstract

Controlling dissolved phosphorus (DP) loss from high P soil to avoid water eutrophication is a worldwide high priority. A greenhouse study was conducted in which flue gas desulfurization gypsum (FGDG) was applied by using different application methods and rates to two agricultural soils. Phosphorus fertilizer was incorporated into the soils at 2.95 g kg–1 to simulate soil with high P levels. The FGDG was then applied at amounts of 0, 1.5, and 15 g kg–1 soil on either the soil surface or mixed throughout the soil samples to simulate no-tillage and tillage, respectively. Ryegrass was planted after treatment application. The study showed that FGDG reduced runoff DP loss by 33% and leachate DP loss 38% in silt loam soil, and runoff DP loss 46% and leachate DP loss 14% in clay loam soil, at the treatment of 15 g kg–1 FGDG. Mixing applied method (tillage) provided strong interaction with higher FGDG. To overall effect, the mixing-applied method performed better in controlling DP loss from silt loam soil, while surface-applied (no tillage) showed its advantage in controlling DP loss from clay loam soil. In practice it is necessary to optimize FGDG concentrations, application methods, and DP sources (runoff or leachate) to get maximized benefits of FGDG application. The FGDG application had no negative effects on the soil and ryegrass.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Flue gas desulfurization gypsum (FGDG) / Silt loam soil / Clay loam soil / Dissolved phosphorus (DP) / Application method / Plant bioassay / Trace element assessment

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yumei Mao, Xiaoping Li, Warren A. Dick, Linkui Cao. Use of flue gas desulfurization gypsum to reduce dissolved phosphorus in runoff and leachate from two agricultural soils. Soil Ecology Letters, 2023, 5(1): 128‒136 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42832-022-0135-5

References

[1]
Baligar, V.C., Clark, R.B., Korcak, R.F., Wright, R.J., Sparks, D.L. 2011. Flue gas desulfurization product use on agricultural land. Advances in Agronomy 111, 51–86.
[2]
Bryant, R.B., Buda, A.R., Peter J.A. 2012. Using flue gas desulfurization gypsum to remove dissolved phosphorus from agricultural drainage waters. Journal of Environmental Quality 41, 664–671.
[3]
Campbell, B., Chen, L.M., Dygert, C., Dick, W.A., 2014. Tillage and crop rotation impacts on greenhouse gas fluxes from soil at two long-term agronomic experimental sites in Ohio. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69, 543–552.
[4]
Chardon, W.J., Schoumans, O.F., 2017. Soil texture effects on the transport of phosphorus from agricultural land in river deltas of Northern Belgium, the Netherlands and North-West Germany. Soil Use and Management 23 (Supp1), 16–24
[5]
Chen, L.M., Stehouwer, R., Tong X.G., Kosta, D., Bighamd, J.M., Dick, W.A., 2015. Surface coal mine land reclamation using a dry flue gas desulfurization product: Short-term and long-term water responses. Chemosphere 134, 459–465.
[6]
Chen, L.M., Dick, A.W., 2011. Gypsum as an agricultural amendment: General use guidelines. The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 1–5
[7]
De Castro, O.H., Tiecher, T., Cherubin, M.R., Silva, A. G.B., Bayer, C. 2020. Does gypsum increase crop grain yield on no-tilled acid soils? A meta-analysis. Agronomy Journal 112, 675–692.
[8]
De Sutter, T.M., Cihacek, L.J., Rahman, S., 2014. Application of flue gas desulfurization gypsum and its impact on wheat grain and soil chemistry. Journal of Environmental Quality 43, 303–11.
[9]
Donald, S.R., Quirine, K., 2011. Cation exchange capacity, In Sims, J.T., Wolf, A., eds. Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures. Northeast Regional Bulletin No. 493. 3rd edition. Newark: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Delaware. pp. 75–86
[10]
Electric Power Research Institute, 2006. A review of agricultural and other land application uses of flue gas desulfurization products. Palo Alto, CA 1010385
[11]
Favaretto N., Norton L.D., Johnston C.T., Bigham, J., Sperrin, M., 2012. Nitrogen and phosphorus leaching as affected by gypsum amendment and exchangeable calcium and magnesium. Soil Science Society of America Journal 76, 575–585.
[12]
He, K., Li, X.P., 2019. Inhibiting effects of flue gas desulfurization gypsum on soil phosphorus loss in Chongming Dongtan, southeastern China. Environmental Science Pollution 26, 17195–17203
[13]
Hossner, L.R., 1996. Dissolution for total elemental analysis, In Sparks, D.L. eds. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3—Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America Inc., Madison, WI, USA. pp. 49–64
[14]
King, K.W., Williams, M.R., Dick, W.A., LaBarge, G.A., 2016. Decreasing phosphorus loss in tile-drained landscapes using flue gas desulfurization gypsum. Journal of Environmental Quality 45, 1722–1730
[15]
Koralegedara, N.H., Pinto, P.X., Dionysiou, D.D., Al-Abed, S.R., 2019. Recent advances in flue gas desulfurization gypsum processes and applications-a review. Journal of Environmental Manage 251, 1–13
[16]
Kordlagharia M.P., Rowellb D.L., 2006. The role of gypsum in the reactions of phosphate with soils. Geoderma 132, 105–115
[17]
Kost, D., Ladwig, K.J., Chen, L., DeSutter, T.M., Espinoza, L., Norton, L.D., Smeal, D., Torbert, H.A., Watts, D.B., Wolkowski, R.P., Dick, W.A., 2018. Meta-analysis of gypsum effects on crop yields and chemistry of soils, plant tissues, and vadose water at various research sites in the USA. Journal of Environmental Quality 47, 1284–1292
[18]
Kuo, S., 1996. Phosphorus, In Sparks, D.L., eds. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3 Chemical Methods, Soil Science Society of America Inc., Madison, WI, USA. 869–917
[19]
Li, X.P., Mao, Y.M., He K., 2018. Application of flue gas desulfurization gypsum in agriculture and environment, Beijing: Science Press, China
[20]
Lopez P.A., Garcia N.A., 1997. Phosphate sorption in vertisols of southwestern Spain. Soil Science 162, 69–77.
[21]
Mao, Y.M., Li, X.P., Dick, A.W., Chen, L.M., 2016. Remediation of saline-sodic soil with flue gas desulfurization gypsum in a reclaimed tidal flat of southeast China. Journal of Environmental Sciences 45, 224–230.
[22]
Michalak, A.M., Anderson, E.J., Beletsky, D., Boland, S., Bosch, N.S., Bridgeman, T.B., Zagorski, M.A., 2013. Record-setting algal bloom in lake Erie caused by agricultural and meteorological trends consistent with expected future conditions. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America 110, 6448.
[23]
Murphy, P.N.C., Stevens, R.J., 2010. Lime and gypsum as source measures to decrease phosphorus loss from soils to water. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 212, 101–111.
[24]
Murphy, J., Riley, J.P., 1962. A modified single solution method for determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 42, 31–36.
[25]
Norton, L.D., 2008. Gypsum soil amendment as a management practice in conservation tillage to improve water quality. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63, 46–48.
[26]
Olsen, S.R., Watanab, F.S., 1963. Diffusion of Phosphorus as related to soil texture and plant uptake. Journal of the American Chemical Society 27, 648–653.
[27]
Penn, C.J., Mullins, G.L., and Zelazny, L.W., 2005. Mineralogy in relation to phosphorus sorption and dissolved phosphorus losses in runoff. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69, 1532–1540.
[28]
Recillasa, S,Rodríguez-Lugoc, V, Monterod, ML, Viquez, S.,2012. Studies on the precipitation behavior of calcium phosphate solutions. Journal of Ceramic Processing Research 13, 5–10.
[29]
Ross, D., Ketterings Q., 2011. Recommended soil tests for determining soil cation exchange capacity. In Sims, J.T., Wolf, A., eds. Recommended Soil Testing Procedures for the Northeastern United States. Northeastern Regional Publication No. 493. pp. 75–86.
[30]
Ryden, J.C., Syers, J.K., 1975. Rationalization of ionic strength and cation effects on phosphate sorption by soils. Journal of Soil Science 26, 395–406.
[31]
Sharpley, A., Wang, X., 2014. Managing agricultural phosphorus for water quality: Lessons from the USA and China. Journal of Environmental Science 26, 1770–1782.
[32]
Sharpley, A.N., Chapra, S.C., Wedepohl, R., Sims, J.T., Daniel, T.C., Redd, K.R., 1994. Managing agricultural phosphorus for protection of surface waters: Issues and options. Environmental Issues 23, 437–451.
[33]
Smith, D.R., King, K.W., Johnson, L., Francesconi, W., Richards, P., Baker, D., Sharpley, A.N., 2015. Surface runoff and tile drainage transport of phosphorus in the mid-western United States. Journal of Environmental Quality 44, 495–502.
[34]
Stehouwer, R.C., Sutton, P., Fowler, R.K., Dick, A.W., 1995. Minespoil amendment with dry flue gas desulfurization by-products: element solubility and mobility. Journal of Environmental Quality 24, 165–174.
[35]
Torbert, H. A., Watts, D.B. 2014. Impact of flue gas desulfurization gypsum application on water quality in a coastal plain soil. Journal of Environmental Quality 43, 273–280.
[36]
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1993. Standards for the use or disposal of sewage biosolids, 40 CFR part 503.. Federal Register 58, 9387–9404.
[37]
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998. Method 3051A: Microwave-assisted Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, Soils, and Oils, Part of Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods. Washington, DC
[38]
Wang, J.M., Yang, P.L., 2018. Potential flue gas desulfurization gypsum utilization in agriculture: A comprehensive review. Rrenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82, 1969–1978.
[39]
Wang, Z., Zhanga, T.Q., Tan C.S., 2018. Simulating crop yield, surface runoff, tile drainage, and phosphorus loss in a clay loam soil of the Lake Erie region using EPIC. Agricultural Water Management 204, 212–221.
[40]
Yu, J., Lei, T., Shainberg, I., Mamedov, A.I., Levy, G.J., 2003. Infiltration and erosion in soils treated with dry PAM and gypsum. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67, 630–636.
[41]
Zhang, Y.H., Huang, S.M., Guo, D.D., Zhang, S.Q., Song, X., Yue, K., Zhang K.K., Bao, D.J., 2019. Phosphorus adsorption and desorption characteristics of different textural fluvo-aquic soils under long-term fertilization. Journal of Soil and Sediment 19, 1306–1318.
[42]
Zoca, S.M., and Penn, C. 2017. An important tool with no instruction manual: A review of gypsum use in agriculture Advances in Agronomy. 144, 1–44.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the China Scholarship Council (201306140128), the Young Scientist Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901207), and by state and federal funds appropriated to The Ohio State University and The Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH, USA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(2782 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/