Two-step calculation method to enable the ecological and human health risk assessment of remediated soil treated through thermal curing
Shaowen Xie , Fei Wu , Zengping Ning , Manjia Chen , Chengshuai Liu , Qiang Huang , Fangyuan Meng , Yuhui Liu , Jimei Zhou , Yafei Xia
Soil Ecology Letters ›› 2021, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 266 -278.
Two-step calculation method to enable the ecological and human health risk assessment of remediated soil treated through thermal curing
• Remediated soil treated by thermal curing exhibited strong inherent resistance to acidic attack with the formation of ZnCr2O4 spinel. • A two-step calculation method to calculate the sum of the leaching and acid-soluble fraction contents of heavy metals in remediated soils for risk evaluation have been proposed. • Compared with the traditional one-step calculation method, this two-step calculation method can effectively avoid underestimating the risk of remediated soils.
The centralized utilization of heavy-metal-contaminated soil has become the main strategy to remediate brownfield-site pollution. However, few studies have evaluated the ecological and human health risks of reusing these remediated soils. Considering Zn as the target metal, systematic pH-dependent leaching and the Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) extraction were conducted at six pH values (pH= 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12) for the remediated soil treated through thermal curing. The pH-dependent leaching results showed that with the formation of ZnCr2O4 spinel phases, the remediated soil exhibited strong inherent resistance to acidic attack over longer leaching periods. Furthermore, the BCR extraction results showed that the leaching agent pH value mainly affected the acid-soluble fraction content. Moreover, a strong complementary relationship was noted between the leaching and acid-soluble fraction contents, indicating that the sum of these two parameters is representative of the remediated soil risk value. Therefore, we proposed a two-step calculation method to determine the sum of the two heavy metal parameters as the risk value of remediated soil. In contrast to the traditional one-step calculation method, which only uses the leaching content as the risk value, this two-step calculation method can effectively avoid underestimating the risk of remediated soil.
Remediated soil / Heavy metal / Leaching agent pH value / Fraction distribution / Ecological and human health risk
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
Solid waste-extraction procedure for leaching toxicity-sulphuric acid & nitric acid method. 2007. China, HJ/T299–2007. |
| [37] |
Standards for Soil Remediation of Heavy Metal Contaminated Sites. 2016. China, DB43/T1165. |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
Technical guidelines for risk assessment of soil contamination of land for construction. 2019. China, HJ 25.3–2019. |
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
Higher Education Press
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |