Research trends of microplastics in the soil environment: Comprehensive screening of effects
Shin Woong Kim , Matthias C. Rillig
Soil Ecology Letters ›› 2022, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 109 -118.
Research trends of microplastics in the soil environment: Comprehensive screening of effects
• We collated and synthesized previous studies reporting on impacts of microplastics in soils. • We found the most frequently used composition, shapes, size, and concentration. • Species sensitivity distribution (SSD) method was used to screen the significant effects. • We suggested special considerations are necessary to manage microplastics in soils.
We collated and synthesized previous studies that reported the impacts of microplastics on soil parameters. The data were classified and integrated to screen for the proportion of significant effects, then we suggest several directions to alleviate the current data limitation in future experiments. We compiled 106 datasets capturing significant effects, which were analyzed in detail. We found that polyethylene and pellets (or powders) were the most frequently used microplastic composition and shape for soil experiments. The significant effects mainly occurred in broad size ranges (0.1–1 mm) at test concentrations of 0.1–10% based on soil dry weight. Polyvinyl chloride and film induced significant effects at lower concentrations compared to other compositions and shapes, respectively. We adopted a species sensitivity distribution (SSD) and soil property effect distribution (SPED) method using available data from soil biota, and for soil properties and enzymes deemed relevant for microplastic management. The predicted-no-effect-concentration (PNEC)-like values needed to protect 95% of soil biota and soil properties was estimated to be between 520 and 655 mg kg-1. This study was the first to screen microplastic levels with a view toward protecting the soil system. Our results should be regularly updated (e.g., quarterly) with additional data as they become available.
Significant effect / Species sensitivity distribution / Soil / Soil properties
| [1] |
American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM), 2001. Standard guide for conducting laboratory soil toxicity tests with the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. E2172-01. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
ANZECC and ARMCANZ, 2000. Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. The guidelines, Paper No. 4, Volume 1. |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME), 2018. |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
European Chemical Agency (ECHA), 2008. Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment. Finland, Helsinki. |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2010. Water quality—Determination of the toxic effect of sediment and soil samples on growth, fertility and reproduction of Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda). ISO 10872:2010. Geneva, Switzerland. |
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
Ministry of the Environment (MOE), 2014. Establishment of Ecological Risk Assessment Frame for Soil Pollution and its Application Scheme in Korea. |
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
National Environment Protection Council (NEPC), 2013. Assessment Site Contamination schedule B5a: Guidelines on Ecological Risk Assessment. |
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 1984. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals No. 207. Earthworm acute toxicity tests. |
| [48] |
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2009. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals No. 232. Collembolan reproduction test in soil. |
| [49] |
PlasticsEurope, 2015. Plastics- the facts 2014/2015: An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data. PlasticsEurope, 1–34. |
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
USEPA. SSD generator (ver. 1.0). 2005. |
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
The Author(s) 2021. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn
Supplementary files
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |