Urban childcare infrastructure in Japan: evaluating satisfaction from the perspectives of parents and childcare workers in Matsudo City

Abstract

In a society like Japan, where the population is aging and birth rates are declining, childcare infrastructure in urban areas plays a vital role as a foundational pillar of the city, supporting children’s safety and well-being, enabling parents to continue working, and ensuring that childcare workers can perform their duties with stability. This study aimed to clarify the multidimensional structure of satisfaction with childcare facilities from the perspectives of both parents and childcare workers and to identify implications for the planning and development of childcare infrastructure in urban areas. A questionnaire survey was conducted at 41 childcare facilities in Matsudo City, Japan, and responses were obtained from 308 parents and 245 childcare workers. Three domains were evaluated: “facility equipment” (hereafter, “equipment”), “surrounding environment,” and “safety of the surrounding environment.” Correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed. Satisfaction with equipment was most strongly associated with overall satisfaction, with standardized regression coefficients of β = 0.446 for parents and β = 0.429 for childcare workers. The regression models explained 41.9% of the variance among parents (R² = 0.419) and 52.6% among childcare workers (R² = 0.526). Both groups placed importance on safety and spaces for children’s activities; however, parents placed greater emphasis on commuting and drop-off/pick-up convenience, as well as convenience in daily life, whereas childcare workers placed greater emphasis on the quality of equipment, the work environment, and operational safety. These findings indicate the need for childcare facility planning that integrates the evaluation criteria of users (parents) and service providers (childcare workers). This approach is consistent with the aims of Sustainable Development Goal 11 (SDG 11), which seeks inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable cities and human settlements. However, because this study was a cross-sectional survey conducted in a single city, the generalizability of the findings to other regions is limited, and causal relationships cannot be inferred.

Keywords

Parents / Childcare workers / Childcare facilities / Satisfaction / Safety / Surrounding environment

References

[1] Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2019) Guidelines for formulating infrastructure longevity plans for social welfare facilities (individual facility plans). (in Japanese). https://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/2015/04/dl/tp0416-01-02.pdf. Accessed 28 Nov 2025.

[2] Children and Families Agency (2025) Ensuring childcare provision systems tailored to local conditions: Measures addressing population decline. (in Japanese). https://www.cfa.go.jp/assets/contents/node/basic_page/field_ref_resources/e4b817c9-5282-4ccc-b0d5-ce15d7b5018c/2c6f572f/20251029_policies_hoiku_171.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov, 2025.

[3] Van den Berg AE, Hovinga D, Joven M, Steensma R, Maas J (2024) Strengthening the pedagogical use of the outdoor area at nature-based daycare centers: an intervention study. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 92;128188 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128188.

[4] Trina NA, Monsur M, Cosco N, Shine S, Loon L, Mastergeorge A. Tools for assessing the STEAM learning affordances and quality of outdoor learning environments of childcare centers: A systematic review. Early Child Educ J Adv online publication, 2025.

[5] Park SJ, Lee HC. Spatial design of childcare facilities based on biophilic design patterns. Sustainability, 2019, 11102851.

[6] Ramsden R, Pike I, Thorne S, Brussoni M (2025) Children’s outdoor play at early learning and child care centres: Examining the impact of environmental play features on children’s play behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.21.25320884.

[7] Gray C, Gibbons R, Larouche R, Sandseter EBH, Bienenstock A, Brussoni M, Chabot G, Herrington S, Janssen I, Pickett W, Power M, Stanger N, Sampson M, Tremblay MS. What is the relationship between outdoor time and physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and physical fitness in children? A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2015, 12664556474.

[8] Clements R. An investigation of the status of outdoor play. Contemp Issues Early Child, 2004, 516880.

[9] Boldemann C, Blennow M, Dal H, Mårtensson F, Raustorp A, Yuen K, Wester U. Impact of preschool environment upon children’s physical activity and sun exposure. Prev Med, 2006, 424301308.

[10] Alhassan S, Sirard JR, Robinson TN. The effects of increasing outdoor play time on physical activity in Latino preschool children. Int J Pediatr Obes, 2007, 23153158.

[11] Lee K, Park JS, Yun S. A study on indoor air quality at daycare centers using IoT environmental sensors. J Asian Archit Building Eng Adv online publication, 2024.

[12] Henderson KE, Grode GM, O’Connell ML, Schwartz MB. Environmental factors associated with physical activity in childcare centers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity, 2015, 12: 43.

[13] Bower JK, Hales D, Tate D, Rubin D, Benjamin SE. The childcare environment and children’s physical activity. Prev Med, 2008, 475479483.

[14] Tugores J, Macarulla M, Gangolells M (2024) Estimation of children’s CO₂ generation rates in naturally ventilated educational buildings. Build Environ 257;111550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111550.

[15] Jung C, Elsamanoudy G, Abdelaziz Mahmoud NS. Towards safer and healthier childcare facilities: Evaluating environmental and safety standards in daycare centers in Dubai. Buildings, 2025, 156953.

[16] Sulaiman Y, Othman AR, Perumal S, Hussin Z (2013) Escalating employee job satisfaction through internal market orientation: a childcare centre perspective. Jurnal Teknologi. Sci Eng. 64(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v64.2250.

[17] Tanaka I, Miwa R, Matsuhashi K, Taniguchi A. A study on the use and evaluation of city parks as places for outdoor activities by childcare facilities near railway stations in Yokohama City. J City Plann, 2009, 443373378. in Japanese)

[18] Urata A, Goto H, Yamamura T. Spatial expansion of outdoor activities and utilization of local resources in childcare facilities without their own playgrounds. J City Plann, 2018, 533423430. in Japanese)

[19] Yamada A. Utilization and evaluation of urban environments in different types of small-scale childcare facilities in Tokyo: A study of small-scale childcare facilities and the urban environments used as childcare settings, Part 2. J Archit Plann (Transactions AIJ), 2016, 8172310691078. in Japanese)

[20] Ono H, Omura K. A basic study of directions for urban development based on residential location choices among dual-income households raising children. J City Plann, 1999, 34: 289-294. in Japanese)

[21] Ono H, Omura K. Trends among dual-income households raising children and their relationship with daycare center development in the Tokyo metropolitan area. J City Plann, 2000, 35: 271-276. in Japanese)

[22] Oba T. Factors affecting the location and capacity of private daycare centers in Tokyo’s 23 wards. J Archit Plann (Transactions AIJ), 2018, 83745593599. in Japanese)

[23] Nobuhara H, Watanabe Y, Hirayama M. An evaluation of the geographical distribution of childcare centers using geographic information systems. Bull Inst Gen Welf Takasaki Univ Health Welf, 2006, 322129(in Japanese)

[24] Murai M, Nagahashi S. Influence of nursery facility space on the development of exploratory behavior among nursery children: Openness as a comprehensive evaluation index of childcare environments, Part 1. J Archit Plann (Transactions AIJ), 1998, 63504119126. in Japanese)

[25] Aoki K, Koike T, Sadayuki M. Development of childcare environments for children under three years of age: A case study in suburban Tokyo. Bull Japan Women’s Univ Fac Home Econ, 2021, 68: 118-124(in Japanese)

[26] Taneichi S, Tanaka I, Matsuhashi K, Miyajima K. Actual ventilation conditions in childcare facilities during the intermediate seasons and their effects on the indoor environment: Based on field measurements and questionnaire surveys in Yokohama City. Proc Symp Human-Life Environ Syst, 2020, 44: 85-88(in Japanese)

[27] Fujii R, Sadayuki M. A study of space and environment in nursery schools from the perspective of the daily activities of one-year-old children: Focusing on the thermal and air environment at two facilities in the Kanto region. J Archit Plann (Transactions AIJ), 2016, 8172923832391. in Japanese)

[28] Chiba Prefecture (2023) Chiba Prefectural Statistical Yearbook, 2023 edition. (in Japanese). https://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/toukei/toukeidata/nenkan/nenkan-r05/. Accessed 1 July 2025.

[29] Matsudo City (2023) Availability and enrollment status of childcare facilities in Matsudo City, Chiba Prefecture. (in Japanese). https://www.city.matsudo.chiba.jp/kosodate/matsudodekosodate/kosodatenavi/hoikuenyouchien/nyuushojoukyou.html. Accessed 22 July 2023.

[30] Ministry of Health, Labour and WelfareCommentary on the Guidelines for Nursery Care and Education, 2018, Tokyo: Froebel-Kan(in Japanese)

[31] Takubo M. Learning multivariate analysis using SPSS, 2009, Tokyo: Tokyo Tosho(in Japanese)

Rights & permissions

The Author(s)