Thermal conductivity of bentonite-sand/fly ash composites for underground thermal infrastructure using neural network and ensemble tree-based machine learning approaches
Pawan Kishor Sah , Vishakha Bharti , Shiv Shankar Kumar , Bhabani Shankar Das
Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 19
The thermal conductivity of bentonite-based mixtures significantly influences the performance and life-span of underground thermal energy systems and radioactive waste geological repository. The Machine Learning (ML) predictive models provide precise and accurate estimation of soil’s thermal conductivity over costly measurements. This investigation evaluates the predictive performance of multilayer perception structures, adaptive neuro-fuzzy architectures and regularized gradient boosting framework for evaluating heat transmission matrices for bentonite-sand (B-S) and bentonite-fly ash (B-F) mixes. The studied input (influencing) parameters included dry density, water content, particle compositions (sand, silt and clay), quartz content, and plasticity index. To perform ML, total 216 dataset of thermal conductivity of B-S and B-F mixtures were measured using KD-2 pro dual probe. The XGBoost model predicts thermal conductivity more accurately than ANN and ANFIS with overall R2 = 0.996, MAE = 0.0113 and RMSE = 0.0246. Furthermore, the study involved a comparison of the proposed ML models with the four different empirical equations for thermal conductivity. It can also be noticed that ML techniques are more superior to the empirical equations for the present dataset.
Bentonite-sand-fly ash / Thermal conductivity / ANN / ANFIS / XGBoost / Statistical comparison
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
Johansen OE (1975) Thermal conductivity of soils. Corps Eng US Army, cold Reg Res Eng Lab PhD Thesis, 637: 1977, ADA 044002 |
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
Tarnawski VR, McCombie ML, Leong WH, Coppa P, Corasaniti S, Bovesecchi G (2018) Canadian field soils IV: modeling thermal conductivity at dryness and saturation. Int J Thermophys 39(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-017-2357-9 |
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Jangir H, Rupali S. in: Venkata Rao, R, Taler, J (eds.) (2023) Evaluation of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference System for forecasting Soil’s unconfined compressive strength. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp 377–387 |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
Ibraheem S, Al S, Iskandar H (2023) A comparative study of MARS, GEP, and GMDH methods for modeling soil thermal conductivity. Int J Thermophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03215-0 |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
Mustafa R, Kumari K, Kumari S, Kumar G, Singh P (2024) Probabilistic analysis of thermal conductivity of soil. Arab J Geosci 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11831-1 |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) Xgboost. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 785–794 |
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
Decagon Devices, I (2016) KD2 pro thermal properties analyzer 1–71 |
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |