Drivers and barriers to adopting sustainable building materials: evidence from construction professionals in Kigali City, Rwanda

Abstract

The construction sector plays a pivotal role in advancing sustainable development but remains a major contributor to environmental degradation. In Rwanda, rapid urbanization and projected increases in building-related carbon emissions underscore the urgency of adopting sustainable building materials. This study investigates the drivers and barriers to adopting of Sustainable building materials among construction professionals in Kigali City, Rwanda. Using a qualitative research design with stratified purposive sampling, data were collected from architects, construction engineers, quantity surveyors, and building developers through questionnaires, semi-structured interview and document analysis. Data were analysed thematically using NVivo 15 software. The results reveal five major drivers, including regulatory frameworks, economic incentives, environmental awareness, social and cultural values, and technological advancements. Conversely, adoption of sustainable building materials is constrained by awareness and knowledge gaps, technical and training limitations, high upfront costs, supply chain weaknesses, regulatory and policy shortcomings, and cultural resistance to change. The findings indicate that regulatory and economic drivers are the most influential in shaping adoption, while awareness and financial constraints remain the most persistent obstacles. The study contributes to sustainability literature by highlighting the importance of context-specific dynamics, showing that in Kigali City, regulatory and economic drivers are critical drivers to adopting sustainable building materials. Policy implications include strengthening enforcement of green building regulations, expanding local manufacturing, establishing strong certification systems, and integrating sustainability into education and training. Addressing these barriers is critical to bridging the gap between Rwanda’s sustainability ambitions and on-the-ground practices, thereby accelerating the transition to a resilient and climate-conscious built environment.

Keywords

Barriers and drivers / Kigali City / Rwanda / Sustainable building materials

References

[1] Abera YA. Sustainable building materials: a comprehensive study on eco-friendly alternatives for construction. Compos Adv Mater, 2024, 33: 1-17

[2] Addy M, Adinyira E, Danku JC, Dadzoe F. Impediments to the development of the green building market in sub-Saharan Africa: the case of Ghana. Smart Sustain Built Environ, 2021, 10(2): 193-207

[3] Ahmed SK, Mohammed RA, Nashwan AJ, Ibrahim RH, Abdalla AQ, Ameen BM, Khdhir RM. Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. J Med Surg Public Health, 2025, 6(3 100198

[4] Almusaed A, Yitmen I, Myhren JA, Almssad A. Assessing the impact of recycled building materials on environmental sustainability and energy efficiency: a comprehensive framework for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Buildings, 2024, 146 1566

[5] Azungah T. Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev, 2020, 624): 329-342

[6] Bakhary NA. Green building materials and technologies: assessing their potential in sustainable construction. J Sustain Civil Eng Technol, 2025, 4(1): 7-18

[7] Bala A, Gupta S. Engineered bamboo and bamboo-reinforced concrete elements as sustainable building materials: a review. Constr Build Mater, 2023, 394 132116

[8] Bashir MT, Khan AB, Khan MMH, Rasheed K, Saad S, Farid F. Evaluating the implementation of green building materials in the construction sector of developing nations. J Hum Earth Future, 2024, 5(3): 528-542

[9] Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol, 2006, 3(2): 77-101

[10] Braun V, Clarke V (2012) Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H (ed) APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Vol. 2. Research designs—Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. American Psychological Association, pp 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004

[11] Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G. Liamputtong P. Thematic analysis. Handbook of research methods in health social sciences, 2019Springer843860

[12] Bredenoord J (2024) Bamboo as a sustainable building material for innovative, low-cost housing construction. Sustainability 16(6):2347; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062347

[13] Byrne D. A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Quant, 2022, 56(3): 1391-1412

[14] Chan MYL, Masrom AN, Yasin SS. Selection of low-carbon building materials in construction projects: construction professionals’ perspectives. Buildings, 2022, 12(4 486

[15] Chaowana K, Wisadsatorn S, Chaowana P. Bamboo as a sustainable building material—culm characteristics and properties. Sustainability, 2021, 1313): 7376

[16] Chen ZS, Yang LL, Chin KS, Yang Y, Pedrycz W, Chang JP, Martínez L, Skibniewski MJ. Sustainable building material selection: an integrated multi-criteria large group decision making framework. Appl Soft Comput, 2021, 113 107903

[17] Din KMS, Ishak MS (2025) Integrating sustainable materials in UAE construction: Addressing socio-economic, regulatory, and technical barriers through qualitative insights. Civil Environ Eng. published online; https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2026-0001

[18] Egenti C, Khatib J. Affordable and sustainable housing in Rwanda. Sustainability, 2021

[19] Eze EC, Sofolahan O, Omoboye OG. Assessment of barriers to the adoption of sustainable building materials in the construction industry of a developing country. Front Eng Built Environ, 2023, 33153-166

[20] Eze EC, Ugulu RA, Onyeagam OP, Adegboyega AA. Determinants of sustainable building materials selection on construction projects. Int J Constr Supply Chain Manag, 2021, 11(2): 66-194

[21] Fernandes d Oliveira JC, Coutinho d Melo FJ (2024) Barriers and drivers of sustainable construction: A systematic literature review. Int J Serv Oper Manag. 47(3):277-313 ; https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsom.2021.10043993

[22] Firoozi AA, Oyejobi DO, Avudaiappan S, Flores ES. Emerging trends in sustainable building materials: technological innovations, enhanced performance, and future directions. Results Eng, 2024

[23] Friday L. Types of purposive sampling techniques with their examples and application in qualitative research studies. Br J Multidiscip Adv Stud, 2024, 5(1): 90-99

[24] Gounder S, Hasan A, Shrestha A, Elmualim A. Barriers to the use of sustainable materials in Australian building projects. Eng Constr Archit Manage, 2023, 30(1): 189-209

[25] Griffin CT, Knowles C, Theodoropoulos C, Allen JH (2024) Barriers to the implementation of sustainable structural materials in green buildings. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10428-180

[26] Gubic I, Arrabothu D, Bugirimfura J, Hasabamagara L, Isingizwe I, Kagina A, Yuhi A. Advocating for green building minimum compliance system in Rwanda: using bricks to achieve sustainability. Facta universitatis - series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2021, 19(1): 67-80

[27] Guest G, Namey E, Chen M. A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS One, 2020, 15(5 e0232076

[28] Ismaeel WSE. The dynamics of sustainable material selection for green-certified projects. Buildings, 2023

[29] Joffe H (2012) Thematic analysis. In: Harper D, Thompson AR (eds) Qualitative methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners. Wiley, pp 209–223

[30] Josiah J, John M, Alaezi O, Obeka IC. A review of alternative building materials for sustainable construction towards sustainable development. J Mod Mat, 2020, 71): 68-78

[31] Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE guide no. 131. Med Teach, 2020, 42(8): 846-854

[32] Kumar S, Puri V, Aggarwal ML. Review of sustainable building materials for construction industry. Int J Tech Res Sci, 2020

[33] Lim WM. What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australas Mark J, 2025, 33(2): 199-229

[34] Linneberg MS, Korsgaard S. Coding qualitative data: a synthesis guiding the novice. Qual Res J, 2019, 19(3): 259-270

[35] Mahame C, Kikwasi GJ, Baruti MM. Barriers to the effective selection of sustainable materials for residential building projects: a qualitative study. Sustainability, 2024

[36] Maier D. Building materials made of wood waste: a solution to achieve the sustainable development goals. Materials, 2021

[37] Marsh R, Brent A, de Kock I. An integrative review of the potential barriers to and drivers of adopting and implementing sustainable construction in South Africa. S Afr J Ind Eng, 2020, 31(3): 24-35

[38] Mayhoub MMG, El Sayad ZMT, Ali AAM, Ibrahim MG. Assessment of green building materials’ attributes to achieve sustainable building façades using AHP. Buildings, 2021, 11(10 474

[39] Minani M, Hategekimana G, Niyonzima T. Assessment of awareness level of green building concepts in Kigali commercial property development. Rwanda J Eng Sci Technol Environ, 2024, 61): 1-16

[40] Mewomo MC, Mogaji IJ, Iruka A (2023) Barriers to the successful adoption of innovative building materials for sustainable construction: A review. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22434-8

[41] Mfon I, George B, Etim N. Advancing sustainability in industrial buildings: materials and construction practices. Int J Dev Stud Environ Monit, 2024, 1(1): 1-7

[42] Morgan H (2022) Understanding Thematic Analysis and the Debates Involving Its Use. The Qualitative Report, 27(10):2079–2091. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5912

[43] Naeem M, Ozuem W, Howell K, Ranfagni S. A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods, 2023, 22(October): 1-18

[44] Nahimana EC (2025) Behavioral heuristics in renewable energy adoption and poverty alleviation in Rwanda. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5366070

[45] National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (2023) Rwanda population and housing census 2022: Urbanization report. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda. https://www.statistics.gov.rw

[46] Nguyen MV, Khanh HD (2025) Evaluation of barriers to sustainable building materials adoption through the lens of the theory of planned behavior. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2024-0356

[47] Nikyema GA, Blouin VY. Barriers to the adoption of green building materials and technologies in developing countries: The case of Burkina Faso. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, 410: 012079

[48] NISR (2023) 5th Rwanda population and housing census (PHC5). National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda. http://www.statistics.gov.rw

[49] Özden M. Content and thematic analysis techniques in qualitative research: purpose, process, and features. Qualitative Inquiry in Education: Theory & Practice, 2024, 2(1): 64-81

[50] Poderytė I, Banaitis A (2024) The embeddedness of sustainability in the construction industry: Identifying key drivers and barriers to implementation. E3S Web of Conferences 546:01011. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454601011

[51] Popescu C, Dissanayake H, Mansi E, Stancu A. Eco breakthroughs: sustainable materials transforming the future of our planet. Sustainability, 2024, 16(23 10790

[52] Rwanda Environment Management Authority (2013) Kigali State of the Environment and Outlook Report. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/9069

[53] Reynolds S (2024) Uncovering the motivations and barriers for suppliers in adopting sustainable practices. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4289738/v1

[54] Rwamuhinda D (2024) Application of Value Management in Conception of Construction Projects in Rwanda: Professionals’ Awareness of and Barriers to Value Management in Construction Projects (Doctoral dissertation, JKUATSABS).

[55] Sharma H. How short or long should a questionnaire be? Researchers’ dilemma in deciding the appropriate questionnaire length. Saudi J Anaesth, 2022, 161): 65-68

[56] Sharma SK, Mudgal SK, Gaur R, Chaturvedi J, Rulaniya S, Sharma P. Navigating sample size estimation for qualitative research. J Med Evid, 2024, 5(2): 133-139

[57] Stanaszek T, Tomal E (2020) Bacterial concrete as a sustainable building material? Sustainability 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020696

[58] Sodangi M, Kazmi ZA. Integrated evaluation of the impediments to the adoption of coconut palm wood as a sustainable material for building construction. Sustainability, 2020, 12(18): 7676

[59] Susilawati A, Al Obaidi ASM, Abduh A, Irwansyah FS, Nandiyanto ABD. How to do research methodology: from literature review, bibliometric, step-by-step research stages, to practical examples in science and engineering education. Indones J Sci Technol, 2025, 1011-40

[60] Tegegne D, Abera M, Alemayehu E. Selection of sustainable building material using multicriteria decision-making model: a case of masonry work in Lideta SubCity, Addis Ababa. Adv Civil Eng, 2023, 2023 9729169

[61] Tiwari P, Kaurav RPS (2022) NVivo. In Encyclopedia of tourism management and marketing (Vols. 1–4, pp. 363–366). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800377486.nvivo

[62] Tokbolat S, Karaca F, Durdyev S, Calay RK. Construction professionals’ perspectives on drivers and barriers of sustainable construction. Environ Dev Sustain, 2020, 22(5): 4361-4378

[63] Umar IA, Lembi JJ, Emechebe LC. Assessment of awareness of architects on sustainable building materials in Minna, Nigeria. Am J Constr Build Mater, 2021, 5(2): 50-56

[64] Vaghefi-Rezaee HA, Sarvari H, Khademi-Adel S, Edwards DJ, Roberts C. A scientometric review and analysis of studies on the barriers and challenges of sustainable construction. Buildings, 2024, 14(11 3432

[65] Yahia AKM, Rahman MM, Shahjalal M, Morshed A. Sustainable materials selection in building design and construction. Int J Sci Eng, 2024, 14): 106-119

[66] Yıldız S, Güneş GŞ. Determining the importance levels of criteria in selection of sustainable building materials and obstacles in their use. J Sustain Constr Mater Technol, 2024

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)