Geometric calibration of all-sky auroral imager based on gradient descent method and the star maps

Abstract

The all-sky imager is an important ground-based auroral observation equipment. Accurate optical geometric correspondence between "object-image" is the foundation for obtaining the structural scale of auroras and achieving joint observations between the all-sky imager and satellites. This paper proposes a geometric calibration method for all-sky imagers based on gradient descent and star maps. This method determines the coordinates of each star point in the star map within the all-sky image, and uses gradient descent to determine the pixel position of the zenith in the all-sky image, as well as the relationship between the imaging radius and zenith angle within the field of view. 26 and 22 star points were marked in all-sky images taken at two different times, respectively, and the calibration results were verified by comparing them with the corresponding star maps. The verification results showed that the absolute values of the stellar azimuth angle errors were 0.154 7° and 0.206 2° on average, and the absolute values of the zenith angle errors were 0.107 6° and 0.113 3° on average, respectively. This indicates that the calibration method proposed in this paper is accurate and effective.

Keywords

auroral imager / star map / geometric calibration

References

[1] Boyd S, Vandenberghe L . 2004. Convex Optimization[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press: 466-479.

[2] Chaston C C, Peticolas L M, Bonnell J W, et al. 2003. Width and brightness of auroral arcs driven by inertial Alfven waves[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 108(A2): 1091.

[3] Hu Z J, Yang H, Huang D, et al. 2009. Synoptic distribution of dayside aurora: Multiple—wavelength all—sky observation at Yellow River Station in Ny—Ålesund, Svalbard[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Solar—Terrestrial Physics, 71(8—9): 794-804.

[4] Hu Z J, Yang H, Liang J, et al. 2010. The 4—emission—core structure of dayside aurora oval observed by all—sky imager at 557.7 nm in Ny—Ålesund, Svalbard[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Solar—Terrestrial Physics, 72(7—8): 638-642.

[5] Hu Z J, Yang H G, Han D S, et al. 2012. Dayside auroral emissions controlled by IMF: A survey for dayside auroral excitation at 557.7 and 630.0 nm in Ny—Ålesund, Svalbard[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 117(A2): A02201.

[6] Hu Z J, Yang H G, Hu H Q, et al. 2013. The hemispheric conjugate observation of postnoon "bright spots"/auroral spirals[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 118(4): 1428-1434.

[7] Hu Z J, Ebihara Y, Yang H G, et al. 2014. Hemispheric asymmetry of the structure of dayside auroral oval[J].Geophysical Research Letters, 41(24): 8696-8703.

[8] Hu Z J, He F, Liu J J, et al. 2017a. Multi—wavelength and multi—scale aurora observations at the Chinese Zhongshan Station in Antarctica[J].Polar Science, 14: 1-8.

[9] Hu Z J, Yang Q J, Liang J M, et al. 2017b. Variation and modeling of ultraviolet auroral oval boundaries associated with interplanetary and geomagnetic parameters[J].Space Weather, 15(4): 606-622.

[10] Hu Z J, Yang H G, Ebihara Y, et al. 2017c. Surveys of 557.7/630.0 nm Dayside Auroral Emissions in Ny—Ålesund, Svalbard, and South Pole Station[M]//Haaland S, Runov A, Forsyth C.Dawn—Dusk Asymmetries in Planetary Plasma Environments. Geophysical Monograph Series. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: 143-154. doi: 10.1002/9781119216346.ch11.

[11] Huo J, Lu D R . 2009. Calibration and validation of an all—sky imager[J].Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 2: 220-223.

[12] Kazantzidis A, Tzoumanikas P, Nikitidou E, et al. 2017. All—sky imager: A new instrument for the estimation of solar irradiance[C]//Cloudiness and Aerosol Optical Properties. Cham: Springer: 1805-1814. doi: 10.1007/978—3—319—35095—0_169.

[13] Qiu Q, Yang H G, Lu Q M, et al. 2013. Widths of dayside auroral arcs observed at the Chinese Yellow River Station[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Solar—Terrestrial Physics, 102: 222-227.

[14] Qiu Q, Yang H G, Lu Q M, et al. 2016. Orientation variation of dayside auroral arc alignments obtained from all—sky observation at Yellow River Station, Svalbard[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Solar—Terrestrial Physics, 142: 20-24.

[15] Qiu Q, Yang H G, Lu Q M, et al. 2017. Correlation between emission intensities in dayside auroral arcs and precipitating electron spectra[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 60(2): 489-498 (in Chinese).

[16] Shi R, Hu Z J, Ni B, et al. 2014. Modulation of the dayside diffuse auroral intensity by the solar wind dynamic pressure[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 119: 10092-10099.

[17] Sigernes F, Holmen S E, Biles D, et al. 2014. Auroral all—sky camera calibration[J].Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems, 3: 241-245.

[18] Tohsing K, Schrempf M, Riechelmann S, et al. 2014. Validation of spectral sky radiance derived from all—sky camera images — a case study[J].Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 7: 2137-2146.

[19] Voss K J, Zibordi G . 1989. Radiometric and geometric calibration of a visible spectral electro—optic "Fisheye" camera radiance distribution system[J].Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology, 6(4): 652-662.

[20] Wang C M, Li Q Z, Xu J Y, et al. 2016. Gravity wave characteristics from multi—stations observation with OH all—sky airglow imagers over mid—latitude regions of China[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 59(5): 1566-1577 (in Chinese).

[21] Xu J, Li Q, Yue J, et al. 2015. Concentric gravity waves over northern China observed by observed by an airglow imager network and satellites[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120: 11058-11078.

[22] Zhang H P, Hu Z J, Hu Y G, et al. 2020. Calibration and verification of all—sky auroral image parameters by star maps[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 63(2): 401-411(in Chinese).

[23] Zotti G, Hoffmann S M, Wolf A, et al. 2021. The simulated sky: Stellarium for cultural astronomy research[J].Journal of Skyscape Archaeology, 6(2): 221-258.