The promotional effect of prosocial motivation on time-based prospective memory

Abstract

Time-based prospective memory (TBPM) is the ability to remember to do a planned task at the right time. In social interactions, people are often motivated to do things for others, which reflects an important factor that influences prospective memory, namely prosocial motivation. According to the motivational cognitive model, prosocial motivation promotes TBPM by paying more attention or adopting more effective strategies. This study explored the effect of prosocial motivation on TBPM under different time-monitoring conditions within the motivational cognitive model framework. One hundred and thirty-one university students participated in this experiment that adopted a 2 (groups: control, prosocial motivation) × 2 (viewing time conditions: limited, unlimited) between-subjects design. The results revealed that the prosocial motivation group had better TBPM performance than the control group under both limited and unlimited viewing time conditions. At the same time, compared with the control group, the prosocial motivation group consumed more internal attention and utilized more strategies under both viewing time conditions, and their external attention was more effective. In addition, the external attention of the prosocial motivation group was higher only when time-monitoring was unlimited. The results of this study further extend knowledge of the motivational cognitive model and expand its scope of application, which has theoretical significance.

Keywords

attention / prosocial motivation / time-based prospective memory / viewing time

References

[1] Altgassen, M., Kliegel, M., Brandimonte, M., & Filippello, P. (2010). Are older adults more social than younger adults? Social importance increases older adults' prospective memory performance. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17(3), 312–328.

[2] Altgassen, M., Sheppard, D. P., & Hendriks, M. P. (2019). Do importance instructions improve time-based prospective remembering in autism spectrum conditions? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 90, 1–13.

[3] Belmar, M., Gladwin, T. E., Reis, L., Pinho, M. S., Silva, D., Nunes, M. V., Raskin, S., de Mendonça, A., & Pereira, A. (2020). An exploration of prospective memory components and subtasks of the memory for intentions test (MIST). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 42(3), 274–284.

[4] Brandimonte, M. A., Ferrante, D., Bianco, C., & Villani, M. G. (2010). Memory for pro-social intentions: When competing motives collide. Cognition, 114(3), 436–441.

[5] Camos, V., & Barrouillet, P. (2004). Adult counting is resource demanding. British Journal of Psychology, 95(1), 19–30.

[6] Cottini, M., Basso, D., & Palladino, P. (2021). Improving prospective memory in school-aged children: Effects of future thinking and performance predictions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 204, 105065.

[7] Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Richardson, S. L., Guynn, M. J., & Cunfer, A. R. (1995). Aging and prospective memory: Examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 996–1007.

[8] Gan, J., & Guo, Y. (2019). The cognitive mechanism of the practice effect of time-based prospective memory: The role of time estimation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2780.

[9] Guo, Y., Gan, J., Ping, Y., Song, T., Liu, T., Wang, E., & Li, Y. (2022). Effective external reminders impair the practice effect of time-based prospective memory. International Journal of Psychology, 57(3), 372–376.

[10] Guo, Y., Gan, J., Wang, M., Ji, X., & Li, Y. (2023). Effect of cognitive style on time-based prospective memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(12), 2680–2689.

[11] Guo, Y., Liu, P., & Huang, X. (2019). The practice effect on time-based prospective memory: The influences of ongoing task difficulty and delay. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2002.

[12] Heathcote, A., Loft, S., & Remington, R. W. (2015). Slow down and remember to remember! A delay theory of prospective memory costs. Psychological Review, 122(2), 376–410.

[13] Henry, J. D. (2021). Prospective memory impairment in neurological disorders: Implications and management. Nature Reviews Neurology, 17(5), 297–307.

[14] Hockey, A., & Cutmore, T. (2021). Inhibitory control in prospective memory: An event related potential comparison of task-switch and dual task processing. Neuropsychologia, 158, 107906.

[15] Hu, W., & Qi, B. (2018). Reminders facilitate the time-based prospective memory task: Internalizing versus externalizing control. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 16(2), 188–194.

[16] Lockwood, P. L., Abdurahman, A., Gabay, A. S., Drew, D., Tamm, M., Husain, M., & Apps, M. A. (2021). Aging increases proprosocial motivation for effort. Psychological Science, 32(5), 668–681.

[17] McBride, D. M., & Flaherty, M. (2020). Comparing costs in time-based and event-based prospective memory. Memory, 28(7), 918–925.

[18] Meier, B., & Zimmermann, T. D. (2015). Loads and loads and loads: The influence of prospective load, retrospective load, and ongoing task load in prospective memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 322.

[19] Mioni, G., Grondin, S., McLennan, S. N., & Stablum, F. (2020). The role of time-monitoring behaviour in time-based prospective memory performance in younger and older adults. Memory, 28(1), 34–48.

[20] Penningroth, S. L., & Scott, W. D. (2013a). Prospective memory tasks related to goals and concerns are rated as more important by both young and older adults. European Journal of Ageing, 10(3), 211–221.

[21] Penningroth, S. L., & Scott, W. D. (2013b). Task importance effects on prospective memory strategy use. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 655–662.

[22] Penningroth, S. L., & Scott, W. D. (2014). A motivational-cognitive model of prospective memory: The influence of goal relevance. International Journal of Advanced Technology in Engineering and Science, 02(6), 126–136.

[23] Penningroth, S. L., Scott, W. D., & Freuen, M. (2011). Prosocial motivation in prospective memory: Higher importance ratings and reported performance rates for social tasks. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(1), 3–11.

[24] Piatak, J. S., & Holt, S. B. (2020). Prosocial behaviors: A matter of altruism or public service motivation? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3), 504–518.

[25] Reese-Melancon, C., Harrington, E. E., & Kytola, K. L. (2019). How did I remember to do that? Self-reported strategy use for laboratory prospective memory tasks. Memory, 27(9), 1224–1235.

[26] Rummel, J., & McDaniel, M. A. (2019). Prospective memory. Routledge.

[27] Ryder, N., Kvavilashvili, L., & Ford, R. (2022). Effects of incidental reminders on prospective memory in children. Developmental Psychology, 58(5), 890–901.

[28] Smith, J. G., Harper, D. N., Gittings, D., & Abernethy, D. (2007). The effect of Parkinson's disease on time estimation as a function of stimulus duration range and modality. Brain and Cognition, 64(2), 130–143.

[29] Taatgen, N. A., Van Rijn, H., & Anderson, J. (2007). An integrated theory of prospective time interval estimation: The role of cognition, attention, and learning. Psychological Review, 114(3), 577–598.

[30] Walter, S., & Meier, B. (2017). Social importance enhances prospective memory: Evidence from an event-based task. Memory, 25(6), 777–783.

[31] Zuber, S., & Kliegel, M. (2020). Prospective memory development across the lifespan: An integrative framework. European Psychologist, 25(3), 162–173.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.