Affectivity and satisfaction in the relationship of Pakistani couples is mediated by dyadic coping-based gratitude

Sultan Shujja, Adnan Adil

PDF
Psych Journal ›› 2024, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2) : 287-294. DOI: 10.1002/pchj.722
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Affectivity and satisfaction in the relationship of Pakistani couples is mediated by dyadic coping-based gratitude

Author information +
History +

Abstract

A substantial body of research supports a positive association between interpersonal gratitude and relationship satisfaction in couples; however, dyadic coping-based gratitude (DC-G) has not been investigated from a dyadic stress and coping perspective. The current study aimed to investigate the mediating role of DC-G between trait affectivity and relationship satisfaction in couples. We collected data from both members of dyads (N = 300 married couples) for the study variables as a pre-requisite for conducting dyadic data analysis using an actor–partner interdependent mediation model (APIMeM). The findings suggest that husbands' positive affect significantly predicted wives' relationship satisfaction via DC-G (actor–partner effect). However, the mediating effect of DC-G appeared to be stronger for the actor–actor and partner–partner effects compared with the cross-partner effect, which supports the actor-only effect. Further, wives' DC-G mediated between husbands' negative affect and wives' relationship satisfaction, suggesting a mediating effect of DC-G for wives but not for husbands. The implications are discussed within the context of couples' relationships.

Keywords

context-dependent gratitude / dyadic relationship satisfaction / trait affectivity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sultan Shujja, Adnan Adil. Affectivity and satisfaction in the relationship of Pakistani couples is mediated by dyadic coping-based gratitude. Psych Journal, 2024, 13(2): 287‒294 https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.722

References

[1]
Algoe, S. B. (2012). Find, remind, and bind: The functions of gratitude in everyday relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(6), 455–469.
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Algoe, S. B., Kurtz, L. E., & Hilaire, N. M. (2016). Putting the “you” in “thank you”: Examining other-praising behavior as the active relational ingredient in expressed gratitude. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 658–666.
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Algoe, S. B., & Zhaoyang, R. (2016). Positive psychology in context: Effects of expressing gratitude in ongoing relationships depend on perceptions of enactor responsiveness. Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(4), 399–415.
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
American Psychological Association. (2022). Publication manual of the American psychological association (Vol. 1, pp. 1–xxii). American Psychological Association.
[5]
Badr, H., Acitelli, L. K., & Carmack Taylor, C. L. (2007). Does couple identity mediate the stress experienced by caregiving spouses? Psychology and Health, 22(2), 211–229.
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Barton, A. W., Futris, T. G., & Nielsen, R. B. (2015). Linking financial distress to marital quality: The intermediary roles of demand/withdraw and spousal gratitude expressions. Personal Relationships, 22(3), 536–549.
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Bodenmann, G. (1997). Dyadic coping-a systematic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137–140.
[8]
Cassidy, J., Shaver, P. R., Mikulincer, M., & Levy, S. (2009). Experimentally induced security influences responses to psychological pain. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 463–478.
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Emmons, R. A., McCullough, M. E., & Tsang, J.-A. (2003). The assessment of gratitude. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 327–341). American Psychological Association.
[10]
Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J., Hilpert, J., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28–46.
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Feeney, B. C., & Van Vleet, M. (2010). Growing through attachment: The interplay of attachment and exploration in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(2), 226–234.
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Fosha, D. (2001). The dyadic regulation of affect. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(2), 227–242.
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Gana, K., & Jakubowska, S. (2016). Relationship between infertility-related stress and emotional distress and marital satisfaction. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(6), 1043–1054.
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Gordon, C. L., & Baucom, D. H. (2009). Examining the individual within marriage: Personal strengths and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 16(3), 421–435.
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Gottman, J. M. (1994). Why marriages succeed or fail and how you can make yours last. Siman & Schuster.
[16]
Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93–98.
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Iqbal, N., & Safdar, H. (2014). Emotional stability, intimacy, and dyadic coping and its relationship with marital satisfaction among love and arranged married couples. (Unpublished master's thesis). International Islamic University.
[18]
Kanter, J. B., & Schramm, D. G. (2018). Brief interventions for couples: An integrative review. Family Relations, 67(2), 211–226.
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Kenny, D. A., & Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6(4), 433–448.
[20]
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.
[21]
Ledermann, T., & Macho, S. (2009). Mediation in dyadic data at the level of the dyads: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(5), 661–670.
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 595–612.
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Leong, J. L. T., Chen, S. X., Fung, H. H. L., Bond, M. H., Siu, N. Y. F., & Zhu, J. Y. (2020). Is gratitude always beneficial to interpersonal relationships? The interplay of grateful disposition, grateful mood, and grateful expression among married couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(1), 64–78.
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Lewandowski, G. W., Nardone, N., & Raines, A. J. (2010). The role of self-concept clarity in relationship quality. Self and Identity, 9(4), 416–433.
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Niazi, S. (2017). Impact of executive functioning and successful intelligence on academic achievement and psychological well-being among young adults: Role of the cognitive-affective processing system. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). University of Sargodha.
[26]
Ostovar, S., Griffiths, M. D., Raeisi, T., & Hashim, I. H. M. (2020). Path analysis of the relationship between optimism, humor, affectivity, and marital satisfaction among infertile couples. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 21, 200–214.
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Parise, M., Manzi, C., Donato, S., & Iafrate, R. (2017). Free to love? The role of intrusive parenting for young adult children's romantic relationship quality. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 45(3), 187–201.
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Parise, M., Pagani, A. F., Donato, S., & Sedikides, C. (2019). Self-concept clarity and relationship satisfaction at the dyadic level. Personal Relationships, 26(1), 54–72.
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Rehman, U. S., Gollan, J., & Mortimer, A. R. (2008). The marital context of depression: Research, limitations, and new directions. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 179–198.
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Renshaw, K. D., Blais, R. K., & Smith, T. W. (2010). Components of negative affectivity and marital satisfaction: The importance of actor and partner anger. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(3), 328–334.
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Salazar, L. R. (2015). The negative reciprocity process in marital relationships: A literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 113–119.
[32]
Shahid, A. (2014). Psychological predictors of psychological health among pregnant women and their infant's birth weight in Punjab [unpublished thesis]. University of Sargodha.
[33]
Shujja, S., Bodenmann, G., Randall, A. K., Adil, A., & Malik, F. (2022a). Development and validation of dyadic coping based gratitude questionnaire (DC-GQ) for use in Pakistan. Journal of Behavior Science, 32(2), 128–155.
[34]
Shujja, S., Bodenmann, G., Randall, A. K., Adil, A., & Malik, F. (2022b). Dyadic coping, dyadic coping-based gratitude (DC-G) and relationship satisfaction in Pakistani couples. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 25(e31), 1–11.
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Unanue, W., Gomez Mella, M. E., Cortez, D. A., Bravo, D., Araya-Véliz, C., Unanue, J., & Van Den Broeck, A. (2019). The reciprocal relationship between gratitude and life satisfaction: Evidence from two longitudinal field studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2480.
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Vollmann, M., Sprang, S., & van den Brink, F. (2019). Adult attachment and relationship satisfaction: The mediating role of gratitude toward the partner. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11–12), 3875–3886.
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Watkins, P. C., Woodward, K., Stone, T., & Kolts, R. L. (2003). Gratitude and happiness: Development of a measure of gratitude, and relationships with subjective well-being. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31(5), 431–451.
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). Self–other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 546–558.
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219–235.
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Zevon, M. A., & Tellegen, A. (1982). The structure of mood change: An idiographic/nomothetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(1), 111–122.
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 2023 The Authors. PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PDF

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/