The effect of lying on memory in daily life: Does motivation matter?

Abstract

Recently, there has been renewed interest in the effect of lying on memory. A growing body of studies has documented that lying can impair memories and cause memory disruptions, such as forgetting and false memories, to a greater degree than telling the truth. This study aimed to investigate whether motivation plays a role in the effect of lying on memory. The present study utilized a daily life paradigm and manipulated three conditions: truth telling, internally motivated lying, and externally motivated lying. We asked participants to engage in a shopping task and to tell lies (externally motivated lying group) or to choose between telling the truth (truth-telling group) and telling lies (internally motivated lying group) in the interview. Forty-eight hours later, the participants were instructed to truthfully carry out multiple memory assessments. The principal findings of this research are that lying can result in memory impairments, and internally motivated lying can lead to greater impairment in source memory than externally motivated lying. Moreover, no significant differences between the two lying groups were found in the memory tests. The empirical findings of this study provide new insights into the effect of lying on memory.

Keywords

daily life / lying / memory / motivation

References

[1] Abe, N. (2009). The neurobiology of deception: Evidence from neuroimaging and loss-of-function studies. Current Opinion in Neurology, 22(6), 594–600.

[2] Ackil, J. K., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2011). Forced fabrication versus interviewer suggestions: Differences in false memory depend on how memory is assessed. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 933–942.

[3] Anderson, M. C., & Hanslmayr, S. (2014). Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(6), 279–292.

[4] Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.

[5] Battista, F., Curci, A., Mangiulli, I., & Otgaar, H. (2021). What can we remember after complex denials? The impact of different false denials on memory. Psychology Crime and Law, 27(9), 914–931.

[6] Battista, F., Mangiulli, I., Herter, J., Curci, A., & Otgaar, H. (2020). The effects of repeated denials and fabrication on memory. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 32(4), 369–381.

[7] Battista, F., Mangiulli, I., Riesthuis, P., Curci, A., & Otgaar, H. (2021). Do liars really remember what they lied upon? The impact of fabrication on memory. Memory, 29(7), 1–15.

[8] Battista, F., & Otgaar, H. (2022). Research on the effects of lying on memory: A Scientometric analysis and a call for new studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 837265.

[9] Battista, F., Otgaar, H., Mangiulli, I., & Curci, A. (2021). The role of executive functions in the effects of lying on memory. Acta Psychologica, 215, 103295.

[10] Bisby, J. A., Horner, A. J., Hørlyck, L. D., & Burgess, N. (2016). Opposing effects of negative emotion on amygdalar and hippocampal memory for items and associations. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(6), 981–990.

[11] Bücken, C. A., Mangiulli, I., Uzun, S., & Otgaar, H. (2022). False denials increase false memories for trauma-related discussions. Memory, 30(7), 1–14.

[12] Christ, S. E., Van Essen, D. C., Watson, J. M., Brubaker, L. E., & McDermott, K. B. (2009). The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: Evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses. Cerebral Cortex, 19(7), 1557–1566.

[13] Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.

[14] Elaad, E., & Gonen-Gal, Y. (2022). Face-to-face lying: Gender and motivation to deceive. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 820923.

[15] Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press.

[16] Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.

[17] Fawcett, J. M., Lawrence, M. A., & Taylor, T. L. (2016). The representational consequences of intentional forgetting: Impairments to both the probability and fidelity of long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(1), 56–81.

[18] Frost, P., Lacroix, D., & Sanborn, N. (2003). Increasing false recognition rates with confirmatory feedback: A phenomenological analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 116(4), 515–525.

[19] Gerrie, M. P., & Garry, M. (2007). Individual differences in working memory capacity affect false memories for missing aspects of events. Memory, 15(5), 561–571.

[20] Geven, L. M., Ben-Shakhar, G., Kindt, M., & Verschuere, B. (2020). Memory-based deception detection: Extending the cognitive signature of lying from instructed to self-initiated cheating. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(2), 608–631.

[21] Hanba, J. M., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2007). Interviewer feedback in repeated interviews involving forced confabulation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 433–455.

[22] Krawczyk, D. C., & D'Esposito, M. (2013). Modulation of working memory function by motivation through loss-aversion. Human Brain Mapping, 34(4), 762–774.

[23] Krawczyk, D. C., Gazzaley, A., & D'Esposito, M. (2007). Reward modulation of prefrontal and visual association cortex during an incentive working memory task. Brain Research, 1141(1), 168–177.

[24] Li, Y., & Liu, Z. (2021). Involvement modulates the effects of deception on memory in daily life. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 756297.

[25] Li, Y., Liu, Z., & Liu, X. (2022a). More lies Lead to more memory impairments in daily life. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 822788.

[26] Li, Y., Liu, Z., & Liu, X. (2022b). Who did I lie to that day? Deception impairs memory in daily life. Psychological Research, 86, 1763–1773.

[27] Mangiulli, I., Lanciano, T., Jelicic, M., van Oorsouw, K., Battista, F., & Curci, A. (2018). Can implicit measures detect source information in crime-related amnesia? Memory, 26(8), 1019–1029.

[28] Mangiulli, I., Otgaar, H., Curci, A., & Jelicic, M. (2020). An experimental investigation of the misinformation effect in crime-related amnesia claims. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(5), 1092–1100.

[29] Mangiulli, I., Riesthuis, P., & Otgaar, H. (2022). The memory-undermining effect of simulated crime-related amnesia and its legal implications: A review. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(2), 213–226.

[30] Mangiulli, I., van Oorsouw, K., Curci, A., & Jelicic, M. (2019). Retrieval-induced forgetting in the feigning amnesia for a crime paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(APR), 1–10.

[31] Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2002). Comparisons of target output monitoring and source input monitoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(7), 845–862.

[32] McArthur, J., Jarvis, R., Bourgeois, C., & Ternes, M. (2022). Lying motivations: Exploring personality correlates of lying and motivations to lie. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 54(4), 335–340.

[33] Otgaar, H., & Baker, A. (2018). When lying changes memory for the truth. Memory, 26(1), 2–14.

[34] Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., Mangiulli, I., & Bücken, C. (2020). The impact of false denials on forgetting and false memory. Cognition, 202, 104322.

[35] Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., Smeets, T., & Wang, J. (2016). Denial-induced forgetting: False denials undermine memory, but external denials undermine belief. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(2), 168–175.

[36] Otgaar, H., Romeo, T., Ramakers, N., & Howe, M. L. (2018). Forgetting having denied: The “amnesic” consequences of denial. Memory and Cognition, 46(4), 520–529.

[37] Palena, N., Caso, L., Cavagnis, L., Greco, A., & Vrij, A. (2022). Exploring the relationship between personality, morality and lying: A study based on the person-centred approach. Current Psychology, 1–14, 20502–20514.

[38] Peters, M. J. V., Jelicic, M., Verbeek, H., & Merckelbach, H. (2007). Poor working memory predicts false memories. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 213–232.

[39] Pezdek, K., Lam, S. T., & Sperry, K. (2009). Forced confabulation more strongly influences event memory if suggestions are other-generated than self-generated. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14(2), 241–252.

[40] Phelps, E. A. (2004). Human emotion and memory: Interactions of the amygdala and hippocampal complex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14(2), 198–202.

[41] Polage, D. C. (2019). Liar, liar: Consistent lying decreases belief in the truth. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(4), 527–536.

[42] Riesthuis, P., Mangiulli, I., Bogaard, G., & Otgaar, H. (2022). The impact of fabrication on recognition memory: An experimental study. New Ideas in Psychology, 67(100966), 100966.

[43] Riesthuis, P., Otgaar, H., Battista, F., & Mangiulli, I. (2021). Public beliefs on the relationship between lying and memory. Psychology Crime and Law, 27, 545–568.

[44] Riesthuis, P., Otgaar, H., Hope, L., & Mangiulli, I. (2022). The effects of incentivized lies on memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 1–12.

[45] Riesthuis, P., Otgaar, H., Hope, L., & Mangiulli, I. (2022). The effects of repetition on memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(4), 1–13.

[46] Riesthuis, P., Otgaar, H., Mangiulli, I., & de Tauzia, R. (2020). Adopting a fictitious autobiography: Fabrication inflation or deflation? Memory, 28(6), 741–752.

[47] Romeo, T., Otgaar, H., Smeets, T., Landstrom, S., & Boerboom, D. (2019). The impact of lying about a traumatic virtual reality experience on memory. Memory and Cognition, 47(3), 485–495.

[48] Romeo, T., Otgaar, H., Smeets, T., Landström, S., & Jelicic, M. (2019). The memory-impairing effects of simulated amnesia for a mock crime. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(6), 983–990.

[49] Shen, Q., Teo, M., Winter, E., Hart, E., Chew, S. H., & Ebstein, R. P. (2016). To cheat or not to cheat: Tryptophan hydroxylase 2 SNP variants contribute to dishonest behavior. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 82.

[50] Sneddon, A. (2021). Alternative motivation and lies. Analysis (United Kingdom), 81(1), 46–52.

[51] Suchotzki, K., Verschuere, B., Van Bockstaele, B., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Crombez, G. (2017). Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 143(4), 428–453.

[52] Taylor, S. F., Welsh, R. C., D.Wager, T., Phan, K. L., Fitzgerald, K. D., & Gehring, W. J. (2004). A tional neuroimaging study of motivation and executive function. NeuroImage, 21, 1045–1054.

[53] van Oorsouw, K., & Giesbrecht, T. (2008). Minimizing culpability increases commission errors in a mock crime paradigm. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13(2), 335–344.

[54] van Oorsouw, K., & Merckelbach, H. (2004). Feigning amnesia undermines memory for a mock crime. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(5), 505–518.

[55] Vieira, K. M., & Lane, S. M. (2013). How you lie affects what you remember. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(3), 173–178.

[56] Walczyk, J., Harris, L. L., Duck, T. K., & Mulay, D. (2014). A social-cognitive framework for understanding serious lies: Activation-decision-construction-action theory. New Ideas in Psychology, 34(1), 22–36.

[57] Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-III administration and scoring manual. The Psychological Corporation.

[58] Zang, C., Fu, Y., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2021). Foveal and parafoveal processing of Chinese three-character idioms in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 119(1), 104243.

[59] Zaragoza, M. S., Payment, K. E., Ackil, J. K., Drivdahl, S. B., & Beck, M. (2001). Interviewing witnesses: Forced confabulation and confirmatory feedback increase false memories. Psychological Science, 12(6), 473–477.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 The Authors. PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.