In-service performance of emergency shutdown valves and dependent operational relationships in the offshore oil and gas industry

Abstract

Industrial process plants use emergency shutdown valves (ESDVs) as safety barriers to protect against hazardous events, bringing the plant to a safe state when potential danger is detected. These ESDVs are used extensively in offshore oil and gas processing plants and have been mandated in the design of such systems from national and international standards and legislation. This paper has used actual ESDV operating data from four mid/late life oil and gas production platforms in the North Sea to research operational relationships that are of interest to those responsible for the technical management and operation of ESDVs. The first of the two relationships is between the closure time (CT) of the ESDV and the time it remains in the open position, prior to the close command. It has been hypothesised that the CT of the ESDV is affected by the length of time that it has been open prior to being closed (Time since the last stroke). In addition to the general analysis of the data series, two sub-categories were created to further investigate this possible relationship for CT and these are “above mean” and “below mean”. The correlations (Pearson's based) resulting from this analysis are in the “weak” and “very weak” categories. The second relationship investigated was the effect of very frequent closures to assess if this improves the CT. ESDV operational records for six subjects were analysed to find closures that occurred within a 24 h period of each other. However, no discriminating trend was apparent where CT was impacted positively or negatively by the frequent closure group. It was concluded that the variance of ESDV closure time cannot be influenced by the technical management of the ESDV in terms of scheduling the operation of the ESDV.

Keywords

Emergency / Shutdown / Valve / Safety instrumented systems / Closure time / IEC-61511

References

[1] M. Rausand, J. Vatn, Reliability modeling of surface controlled subsurface safety valves, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 61 (1998) 159-166, 1998.

[2] G.M. Makaryants, Fatigue failure mechanisms of a pressure relief valve, J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 48 (2017) 1-13.

[3] G. Landucci, S. Bonvicini, V. Cozzani, A methodology for the analysis of domino and cascading events in Oil & Gas facilities operating in harsh environments, Saf. Sci. 95 (2017) 182-197.

[4] R. Ouache, M.N. Kabir, A.A.J. Adham, A reliability model for safety instrumented system, Saf. Sci. 80 (2015) 264-273.

[5] J. Sobral, C. Guedes Soares, Assessment of the adequacy of safety barriers to hazards, Saf. Sci. 114 (2019) 40-48.

[6] J. Boakye, et al., Which consequences matter in risk analysis and disaster assessment? Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc. 71 (2022).

[7] P. Zhu, et al., Review of work flows of emergency shutdown systems in the Norwegian oil T and gas industry, Saf. Sci. 121 (2020) 594-602.

[8] F.I. Syed, et al., Artificial lift system optimization using machine learning applications, Petroleum 8 (2022) (2022) 219-226.

[9] P. Goteti,How and when do I validate, proof test and Re-validate my SIS logic solver? J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 55 (2018) 320-331.

[10] J. Andrews, C. Fecarotti, Modelling life extension of safety critical systems, Saf Reliab Complex Eng Syst (2015) 8.

[11] J.E. Vinnem, Risk indicators for major hazards on offshore installations, Saf. Sci. 48 (2010) 770-787.

[12] R. Pitblado, et al. Concepts for dynamic barrier management, J. Loss Prev., Process. Ind. 43 (2016) 741-746.

[13] A. Mkhida, J.-M. Thiriet, J.-F. Aubry, Integration of intelligent sensors in safety instrumented systems (SIS), Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 92 (2014) 142-149.

[14] J. Xing, Z. Zeng, E. Zio, Dynamic business continuity assessment using condition monitoring data, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc. 41 (2019).

[15] M. Schӧnbeck, M. Rausand, J. Rouvroye, Human and organisational factors in the operational phase of safety instrumented systems: a new approach, Saf. Sci. 48 (2010) 310-318.

[16] R. Goff, J. Kay, Investigation into the Immediate and Underlying Causes of Failures of Offshore Riser Emergency Shutdown Valves, 2015.

[17] I. Animah, M. Sha fi ee, Condition assessment, remaining useful life prediction and life extension decision making for offshore oil and gas assets, J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 53 (2018) 17-28.

[18] M. Łaciak, et al., Impact of flood water on the technical condition of natural gas transmission pipeline valves, J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 63 (2019).

[19] B. Yacine, D. Mébarek, H. Hefaidh, Contribution to the ageing control of onshore oil and gas fields, Petroleum 6 (2020) (2020) 311-317.

[20] H. Zhang, et al., Research on remote intelligent control technology of throttling and back pressure in managed pressure drilling, Petroleum 7 (2021) (2021) 222-229.

[21] L. Dong, et al., Review of research on intelligent diagnosis of oil transfer pump malfunction, Petroleum 9 (2) (2023) 135-142.

[22] Y. Zhong, J. Zhao, The optimal model of oilfield development investment based on Data Envelopment Analysis, Petroleum 2 (2016) 307-312, 2016.

[23] A. Zhang, A. Barros, Y. Liu, Performance analysis of redundant safetyinstrumented systems subject to degradation and external demands, J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 62 (2019) 1-11.

[24] S. Wu, et al., Reliability assessment for final elements of SISs with time dependent failures, J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 51 (2018) 186-199.

[25] Z. Li, et al., A novel acoustic emission detection module for leakage recognition in a gas pipeline valve, Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 105 (2017) 32-40.

[26] U. Shafiq, et al., A Review on Modeling and Simulation of Blowdown from Pressurized Vessels and Pipelines, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019.

[27] M. Bjerre, et al., Analysis of Pressure Safety Valves for fire protection on offshore oil and gas installations, Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 105 (2017) 60-68.

[28] D. Alderson, et al., Surprise is inevitable: how do we train and prepare to make our critical infrastructure more resilient? Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc. 72 (2022).

[29] J.D. Evans, Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 1996.