Formation evaluation and rock type classification of Asmari Formation based on petrophysical-petrographic data: A case study in one of super fields in Iran southwest

Raeza Mirzaee Mahmoodabadi , Sadegh Zahiri

Petroleum ›› 2023, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 143 -165.

PDF
Petroleum ›› 2023, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) :143 -165. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2022.01.009
research-article
Formation evaluation and rock type classification of Asmari Formation based on petrophysical-petrographic data: A case study in one of super fields in Iran southwest
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The Oligo-Miocene Asmari Formation is one of the most important hydrocarbon reservoirs in the Middle East. The oilfield under study is one of the largest oilfields in the Zagros basin with the Asmari Formation being the major reservoir rock. In this study, petrographic analyses, petrophysical data and neural network clustering techniques were used for identifying rock types in the Asmari reservoir. Facies analysis of the Asmari Formation in the study area has resulted in the definition of 1 clastic lithofacies and 14 carbonate microfacies types. Using petrophysical logs from 43 wells and their correlation with capillary pressure (Pc) curves, led to the recognition of 7 electrofacies (EF1-EF7). Microscopic evidence of Electrofacies group C1 and S1 show that the sedimentary facies of these electrofacies are most commonly found in restricted and shoal facies belts zone. Also, petrographic studies show that the sedimentary facies of C2, C3, C4, S2 and S3 were formed in the open marine, Lagoon, and Tidal flat facies belt zone of homoclinal ramp sedimentary environment during the Oligo-Miocene based on relative sea level changes respectively. The link between electrofacies and geological data indicated that both sedimentary and diagenetic processes controlled the reservoir quality of the Asmari Formation. Porosity, permeability and water saturation were used to estimate the reservoir quality of each electrofacies. EFs 1 and 2 with high porosity and permeability, low water saturation is considered as the best reservoir with regard to sedimentary textures (dolowackestone and dolograinstone) and the effect of diagenetic processes such as dolomitization processes. Vuggy, growth framework and interparticle porosities are major in EF-2, while the intercrystalline porosity is the major type in EF-1. EFs 3 and 4 show low values of porosity, permeability and high percentage of water saturations, which characterizes them as poor reservoir rocks. Finally, EF-5 is the only electrofacies in the siliciclastic parts of the Asmari reservoir, which is composed of rounded and well-sorted quartz grains that are slightly cemented. In sandstone electrofacies, electrofacies EF-5 (S1), is the best type of sandstone reservoir rock and to move towards electrofacies EF-7 (S3), will reduce reservoir quality. In carbonate electrofacies, also, electrofacies no 1, the best type of carbonate reservoir rock can be observed and move towards electrofacie number 4, lower quality of reservoir rocks is seen.

Keywords

Asmari formation / Electrofacies / Petrophysical log / Rock typing / Zagros basin

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Raeza Mirzaee Mahmoodabadi, Sadegh Zahiri. Formation evaluation and rock type classification of Asmari Formation based on petrophysical-petrographic data: A case study in one of super fields in Iran southwest. Petroleum, 2023, 9(2): 143-165 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2022.01.009

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Q. Dou, Y. Sun, C. Sullivan, Rock-physics-based carbonate pore type characterization and reservoir permeability heterogeneity evaluation, Upper San Andres reservoir, Permian Basin, west Texas, J. Appl. Geophys. 74 (2012) 8-18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.02.010.

[2]

H. Rong, Y. Jiao, L. Wu, Y. Gu, L. Zhang, R. Li, F. Zeng, Effects of diagenesis on the acoustic velocity of the Triassic oolitic shoals in the Yudongzi outcrop of Erlangmiao area, Northwest Sichuan Basin, J. Earth Sci. 23 (2012) 542-558, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-012-0274-1.

[3]

R.M. Slatt, Stratigraphic Reservoir Characterization for Petroleum Geologists, Geophysicists, and Engineers, Elsevier Publ. Co, 2006, pp. 20-33.

[4]

M. Rebelle, F. Umbhauer, E. Poli, Pore to grid carbonate rock-typing, in: International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar, International Petroleum Technology Conference, 2009, https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-13120-MS.

[5]

M. Rebelle, B. Lalanne, Rock-typing in Carbonates: A Critical Review of Clustering Methods, vol. 14, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2118/171759-MS.

[6]

D. Tiab, E.C. Donaldson, Petrophysics: Theory and Practice of Measuring Reservoir Rock and Fluid Transport Properties, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004, 2004.

[7]

H. Amel, A. Jafarian, A. Husinec, A. Koeshidayatullah, R. Swennen, Microfacies, depositional environment and diagenetic evolution controls on the reservoir quality of the permian upper dalan formation, kish gas field, Zagros basin, Mar. Petrol. Geol. 67 (2015) 57-71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.04.012.

[8]

J. Wynd, Biofacies of the Iranian oil consortium agreement area, IOOC rep 1082 (1965).

[9]

J. Stocklin, Structural history and tectonic of Iran, A review. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists Bull., K 52 (No. 7) (1968b) 1229-1258.

[10]

N.L. Falcon, Southern Iran: Zagros mountains,in: A. Spencer (Ed.), MesozoiceCenozoic Orogenic Belts: Data for Orogenic Studies: Alpine-Himalayan Orogens, vol. 4, Geological Society of London, Special Publications, 1974, pp. 199-211.

[11]

M. Alavi, Tectonics of the Zagros orogenic belt of Iran: new data and interpretations, Tectonophysics 229 (1994) 3-4, https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)90030-2, 211-238.

[12]

M. Alavi, Regional stratigraphy of the Zagros fold-thrust belt of Iran and its proforeland evolution, Am. J. Sci. 304 (1) (2004) 1-20, https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.304.1.1.

[13]

M. Alavi, Structures of the Zagros fold-thrust belt in Iran, Am. J. Sci. 37 (9) (2007) 1064-1095, https://doi.org/10.2475/09.2007.02.

[14]

F. Mouthereau, O. Lacombe, J. Verges, Building the Zagros collisional orogen: timing, strain distribution and the dynamics of Arabia/Eurasia plate convergence, Tectonophysics 532 (2012) 27-60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.01.022.

[15]

P. Navabpour, E. Barrier, Stress states in the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt from passive margin to collisional tectonic setting, Tectonophysics 581 (2012) 76-83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.01.011.

[16]

M.B. Allen, M. Talebian, Structural variation along the Zagros and the nature of the dezful embayment, Geol. Mag. 148 (2011) 911-924, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756811000318.

[17]

M.L. Bordenave, J.A. Hegre, Current distribution of oil and gas fields in the Zagros Fold Belt of Iran and contiguous offshore as the result of the petroleum systems, Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ. 330 (2010) 291-353.

[18]

P.R. Sharland, R. Archer, D.M. Casey, R.B. Davies, S.H. Hall, A.P. Heward, A.D. Horbury, M.D. Simmons, Arabian Plate Sequence Stratigraphy, Bahrain, Gulf PetroLink, 2001, pp. 199-214.

[19]

F.S.P. Van Buchem, T. Allan, G.V. Lausen, M. Lotfpour, A. Moallemi, S. Monibi, H. Motiei, N. Pickard, A.R. Tahmasbi, V. Vedrenne, B. Vincent,Regional Stratigraphic Architecture and Reservoir Types of the Oligo-Miocene Deposits in the Dezful Embayment (Asmari and Pabdeh Formations) SW Iran, vol. 329, Geological Society, Publications, London, 2010, pp. 219-263, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP329.10.

[20]

A. Mirza Gholipour, A. Haghi, Geological Study of Marun Oil Field. Ahwas, Iran, Geology Department, National Iranian South Oil Company, 1990, p. 55. R-port No. 4210.

[21]

E. Mooi, M. arstedt, A Concise Guide to Market Research, Captulo 9,’ Luster Analysis, Springer 2011, 2011.

[22]

T. Euzen, M.R. Power, Well log cluster analysis and electrofacies classification: a probabilistic approach for integrating log with mineralogical data. Geoconvention, Canadian Society of Petrole-Geologists, in: CSPG CSEG CWLS Convention, 2012.

[23]

H. Abuseda, M.A. Kassab, A.M. LaLa, N.A. El Sayed, Integrated petrographical and petrophysical studies of some Eocene carbonate rocks, Southwest Sinai, Egypt. Egypt, J. Petrol. 24 (2015) 213-230, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.05.006.

[24]

R.J. Dunham, Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture, in: W.E. Ham (Ed.), Classification of Carbonate Rocks, vol. 1, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Members, 1962, pp. 108-121.

[25]

E. Flugel, Microfacies of Carbonate Rocks, Analysis, Interpretation and Application, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010.

[26]

J.L. Wilson, Carbonate Facies in Geological History, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1975.

[27]

F.J. Lucia, Petrophysical parameters estimated from visual descriptions of carbonate rocks: a field classification of carbonate pore space, J. Petrol. Technol. 35 (3) (1983) 629-637, https://doi.org/10.2118/10073-PA.

[28]

P.W. Choquette, L.C. Pray, Geology nomenclature and classification of porosity in sedimentary carbonate, Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 54 (1970) 207-250, https://doi.org/10.1306/5D25C98B-16C1-11D7-8645000102C1865D.

[29]

F.J. Pettijohn, P.E. Potter, R. Siever, Sand and Sandstone, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.

[30]

M. Nadjaf, A. Mahboubi, R. Moussavi-Harami, R. Mirzaee Mahmoodabadi, Depositional history and sequence stratigraphy of outcropping tertiary carbonates in the Jahrum and Asmari formations, Shiraz area (SW Iran), J. Petrol. Geol. 27 (2004) 179-190, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.2004.tb00052.x.

[31]

W. Schlager, Carbonate sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy, SEPM Concepts Sedimentol. Paleontol. Ser 8 (2005) 200.

[32]

D. Emery, K. Myers, Sequence Stratigraphy, Blackwell scientific, Oxford, 1996.

[33]

O. Catuneanu, Principle of Sequence Stratigraphy, Elsevier, 2006.

[34]

G. Guo, M.A. Diaz, F.J. Paz, J. Smalley, E.A. Waninger, Rock Typing as an Effective Tool for Permeability and Water-Saturation Modeling: a Case Study in a Clastic Reservoir in the Oriente Basin, vol. 10, SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2007, p. 6, https://doi.org/10.2118/97033-MS. SPE-97033-Pa.

[35]

A. Ghabeishavi, H. Vaziri-Moghaddam, A. Taheri, Facies distribution and sequence stratigraphy of the coniacian-Santonian Succession of the Bangestan Palaeo-high in the Bangestan anticline, SW Iran, Facies 55 (2009) 243-257, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10347-008-0171-3.

[36]

A. Assadi, H. Rahimpou-Bonab, R. Kadkhodaie-Ilkhchi, Integrated rock typing of the grainstone facies in a sequence framework: a case from the Jurassic Arab formation in the Persian gulf, Acta Geol. Sin. English Edition 92 (2018) 1432-1450, https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.13636.

[37]

R. Mirzaee Mahmoodabadi, Sequence Stratigraphy of Cretaceous -Paleogene Succession in Shiraz Area, Fars, Zagros, Iran, vol. 30, IAS, Oral, 2013a. Manchester 2-5 sep.

[38]

R. Mirzaee Mahmoodabadi, Depositional Environments and Sequence Stratigraphy of Paleocene e Eocene Sediments in Shiraz Area, Fars, Zagros, Iran 30 IAS (International Association of Sedimentology), Oral, 2013b. Manchester 2-5 Sep.

[39]

R. Mirzaee Mahmoodabadi, Sedimentary environments and correlative sequence stratigraphy of cretaceous -Paleogene Succession in Shiraz area, fars, SW Iran, scientific research, Open J. Geol. 4 (2014) 1-17, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2014.41001.

[40]

R. Mirzaee Mahmoodabadi, Sequence microbiostratigraphy of Jahrum and Asmari formations in Shiraz area, Zagros, fars, SW, Iran, Open J. Geol. 4 (2014), https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2014.44009, 93-10.

[41]

R. Mirzaee Mahmoodabadi, The Assessment of microfacies and reservoir potential relationship (porosity and pore size) of the Sarvak Formation in SW Iran, Geosci. J. 22 (5) (2018) 793-805, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-017-0084-7.

[42]

R. Mirzaee Mahmoodabadi, Facies analysis, sedimentary environments and correlative sequence stratigraphy of Gachsaran formation in SW Iran, Carbonates Evaporites 35 (2020a), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-020-00555-y.

[43]

R. Mirzaee Mahmoodabadi, Sequence stratigraphy of Albianecampanian carbonate deposits (Sarvak and Ilam formations) in Shiraz area, fars, SW Iran, Carbonates Evaporites 35 (2020b), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-020-00628-y.

[44]

M. Moradi, R. Moussavi-Harami, A. Mahboubi, M. Khanehbad, A. Ghabeishavi, Rock typing using geological and petrophysical data in the Asmari reservoir, Aghajari Oilfield, SW Iran, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 152 (2017) 523-537, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.01.050.

[45]

M. Farshi, R. Moussavi-Harami, A. Mahboubi, M. Khanehbad, Reservoir rock typing using integrating geological and petrophysical properties for the Asmari Formation in the Gachsaran oil field, Zagros basin, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 176 (2019) 161-171, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.12.068.

[46]

Y. Du, J. Zhang, S. Zheng, J. Xin, J. Chen, Y. Li, The rudist buildup depositional model, reservoir architecture and development strategy of the cretaceous Sarvak formation of Southwest Iran, Petroleum 1 (1) (2015) 16-26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2015.04.001.

[47]

M. Rastegarnia, A. Sanati, D. Javani, A comparative study of 3D FZI and electrofacies modeling using seismic attribute analysis and neural network technique: a case study of Cheshmeh-Khosh Oil field in Iran, Petroleum 2 (3) (2016) 225-235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2016.06.005.

[48]

A. Elkhateeb, R. Rezaee, A. Kadkhodaie, A New Integrated Approach to Resolve the Saturation Profile Using High-Resolution Facies in Heterogenous Reservoirs, Petroleum 8 (3) (2022) 318-331, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2021.06.004.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/