Status of surfactant EOR technology

James J. Sheng

Petroleum ›› 2015, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) : 97 -105.

PDF
Petroleum ›› 2015, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) :97 -105. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2015.07.003
Review article
research-article
Status of surfactant EOR technology
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Surfactant enhanced oil recovery (EOR) includes surfactant flooding and surfactant stimulation. The main functions of surfactants are to reduce interfacial tension and wettability alteration. This paper is to review the EOR technology related to surfactant injection. The reviewed topics include the following:

• Surfactant EOR mechanisms

• Factors affecting interfacial tension

• Trapping number

• Screening criteria

• Laboratory work

• Numerical simulation work

• Summary of pilot and large-scale applications

• Surfactants used

• Salinity gradient

• Surfactant EOR in carbonate reservoirs

• Surfactant EOR in shale reservoirs

Keywords

Surfactant flooding / Surfactant EOR / Review / Enhanced oil recovery / Chemical EOR

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
James J. Sheng. Status of surfactant EOR technology. Petroleum, 2015, 1(2): 97-105 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2015.07.003

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgments

This work, especially field data collection part, was financially Supported by the Joint Industry Project (JIP), Chemical EOR Knowledge Database. The financial support from the member companies in this JIP are gratefully appreciated.

References

[1]

J.-G. Niu, P. Chen, Z.-B. Shao, D.-M. Wang, G. Sun, Y. Li, Research and development of polymer enhanced oil recovery, in: H.-Q. Cao (Ed.), Research and Development of Enhanced Oil Recovery in Daqing, Petroleum Industry Press, 2006, pp. 227-325.

[2]

D.M. Wang, Development of new tertiary recovery theories and technologies to sustain Daqing oil production, P.G.O.D.D. 20 (3) (2001) 1-7.

[3]

J.J. Sheng, Comparison of the effects of wettability alteration and IFT reduction on oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs, Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 8 (1) (2013) 154-161.

[4]

J.J. Sheng, Modern Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery: Theory and Practice, Elsevier, 2011.

[5]

L.W. Lake, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Prentice-Hall, 1989.

[6]

G.L. Stegemeier, Mechanisms of entrapment and mobilization of oil in porous media, in: D. O. Shah, R.S. Schechter (Improved Oil Recovery by Surfactant and Polymer Flooding,Eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1977, pp. 55-91.

[7]

J.J. Sheng, Review of surfactant enhanced oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs, Adv. Pet. Explor. Dev. 6 (1) (2013) 1-10.

[8]

J.J. Sheng, in:J.J. Sheng (Ed.), Surfactant Enhanced Oil Recovery in Carbonate Reservoirs, Chapter 12 in EOR Field Case Studies, Elsevier, 2013, pp. 281-299.

[9]

B. Adibhatla, X. Sun, K.K. Mohanty,Numerical Studies of Oil Production from Initially Oil-wet Fracture Blocks by Surfactant Brine Imbibitions, 2005. Paper SPE 97687 presented at the SPE International Improved Oil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 5e6 December.

[10]

M. Delshad, N.F. Najafabadi, G. Anderson, G.A. Pope, K. Sepehrnoori, Modelling wettability alteration by surfactants in naturally fractured reservoirs, SPEREE 12 (3) (2009) 361-370.

[11]

R.N. Healy, R.L. Reed, Immiscible microemulsion flooding, SPEJ (April) (1977) 129-139.

[12]

R.N. Healy, R.L. Reed, Some physical-chemical aspects of microemulsion flooding: a review,in: D. O. Shah, R.S. Schechter (Improved Oil Recovery by Surfactant and Polymer Flooding,Eds.), Academic Press, 1977, pp. 383-437.

[13]

C. Huh, Interfacial tension and solubilizing ability of a microemulsion phase that coexists with oil and brine, J. Coll. Interface Sci. 71 (1979) 408-428.

[14]

J.J. Sheng, Optimum phase type and optimum salinity profile in surfactant flooding, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 75 (1-2) (2010) 143-153.

[15]

G.J. Hirasaki, Interpretation of the change in optimal salinity with overall surfactant concentration, SPEJ (December) (1982) 971-982.

[16]

R.C. Nelson, The salinity-requirement diagramda useful tool in chemical flooding research and development, SPEJ (April) (1982) 259-270.

[17]

M. Baviere, W.H. Wade, R.S. Schechter, The effect of salt, alcohol and surfactant on optimum middle phase composition,in: D. O. Shah (Ed.), Surface Phenomena in Enhanced Oil Recovery, Plenum, 1981, pp. 117-135.

[18]

K.D. Pennell, G.A. Pope, L.M. Abriola, Influence of viscous and buoyancy forces on the mobilization of residual tetrachloroethylene during surfactant flushing, Env. Sci. Tech. 30 (4) (1996) 1328-1335.

[19]

M. Jin, A Study of Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Characterization and Surfactant Remediation, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 1995.

[20]

E.E. Isaacs, J. Iyory, M.K. Green, Steam-foams for heavy oil and bitumen recovery, in:L.L. Schramm (Ed.), Foams:Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1994, pp. 235-258.

[21]

J.J. Sheng, in:J.J. Sheng (Ed.), Foams and Their Applications in Enhancing Oil Recovery, Chapter 11 in EOR Field Case Studies, Elsevier, 2013, pp. 251-280.

[22]

M. Puerto, G.J. Hirasaki, C.A. Miller, J.R. Barnes, Surfactant systems for EOR in high-temperature, high-salinity environments, SPE J. 17 (1) (2012) 11-19.

[23]

J.R. Barnes, J.P. Smit, J.R. Smit, P.G. Shpakoff, K.H. Raney, M.C. Puerto,Development of Surfactants for Chemical Flooding at Difficult Reservoir Conditions, 2008 paper SPE 113313 presented at the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 20-23, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

[24]

B.J. Miller, M.J. Pitts, P. Dowling, D. Wilson,Single Well Alkaline-surfactant Injectivity Improvement Test in the Big Sinking Field, 2004 paper SPE 89384 presented at the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 17e21 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

[25]

N.A. Rilian, M. Sumestry, W. Wahyuningsih, Surfactant Stimulation to Increase Reserves in Carbonate Reservoir “A Case Study in Semoga Field”, 2010 paper SPE 130060 presented at the SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, 14e17 June, Barcelona, Spain.

[26]

J.J. Taber, F.D. Martin, R.S. Seright, EOR screening criteria revisitedepart 1: introduction to screening criteria and enhanced recovery field projects, SPEREE (August) (1997) 189-198.

[27]

J.J. Taber, F.D. Martin, R.S. Seright, EOR screening criteria revisitedepart 2: applications and impact of oil prices, SPEREE (August) (1997) 199-205.

[28]

A. Al Adasani, B. Bai, Analysis of EOR projects and updated screening criteria, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 79 (2011) 10-24.

[29]

A.N. Carcoana,Enhanced Oil Recovery in Rumania, 1982 paper SPE 10699 presented at the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, 4e7 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma.

[30]

G.O. Goodlett, M.M. Honarpour, F.T. Chung, P.S. Sarathi,The Role of Screening and Laboratory Flow Studies in EOR Process Evaluation, 1986. Paper SPE 15172 presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, 19e21 May, Billings, Montana, USA.

[31]

J.P. Brashear, V.A. Kuuskraa, The potential and economics of enhanced oil recovery, J. Pet. Tech. 30 (9) (1978) 1231-1239.

[32]

D.B. Hand,Dineric distribution: I. The distribution of a consolute liquid between two immiscible liquids, J. Phys. Chem. 34 (1939) 1961-2000.

[33]

R.C. Nelson, The effect of live crude on phase behavior and oil-recovery efficiency of surfactant flooding systems, SPEJ 23 (3) (1983) 51-510.

[34]

M. Bourrel, F. Verzaro, C. Chambu, Effect of oil type on solubilization by amphiphiles, SPERE 2 (1) (1987) 41-53.

[35]

C. Cottin, D.C. Morel, D. Levitt, P.R. Cordelier, G.A. Pope, (Alkali) Surfactant Gas Injection: Attractive Laboratory Results under the Harsh Salinity and Temperature Conditions of Middle East Carbonates, 2012 paper SPE 161727 presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, 11e14 November, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

[36]

M.C. Puerto, R.L. Reed, A three-parameter representation of surfactant/oil/brine interaction, SPEJ 23 (4) (1983) 669-680.

[37]

M. Roshanfekr, R.T. Johns, G. Pope, L. Britton, H. Linnemeyer, C. Britton, A. Vyssotski, Simulation of the effect of pressure and solution gas on oil recovery from surfactant/polymer floods, SPEJ 17 (3) (2012) 705-716.

[38]

G.J. Southwick, Y. Svec, G. Chilek, G.T. Shahin, Effect of live crude on alkaline/surfactant/polymer formulations: implications for final formulation design, SPE J. 17 (2) (2012) 352-361.

[39]

A.R. Sagi, C.P. Thomas, Y. Bian, J.T. Kwan, M. Salehi, G.J. Hirasaki, M.C. Puerto, C.A. Miller, Laboratory Studies for Surfactant Flood in Lowtemperature, Low-salinity Fractured Carbonate Reservoir, 2013 paper SPE 164062 presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, 8e10 April, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.

[40]

S.H. Jang, P.J. Liyanage, J. Lu, D.H. Kim, G.W.P. Arachchilage, C. Britton, U. Weerasooriya, G.A. Pope,Microemulsion Phase Behavior Measurements Using Live Oils at High Temperature and Pressure, 2014 paper SPE 169169 presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 12e16 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

[41]

M. Kahlweit, R. Strey, P. Firman, D. Haase, J. Jen, R. Schomaecker, General patterns of the phase behavior of mixtures of water, nonpolar solvents, amphiphiles, and electrolytes, Langmuir 4 (3) (1988) 499-511.

[42]

A. Skauge, P. Fotland, Effect of pressure and temperature on the phase behavior of microemulsions, SPERE 5 (4) (1990) 601-608.

[43]

C.L. Sassen, Th W. J. de Swaan Arons, Influence of pressure on the phase behavior for the systems H2O + C10 + C4E1 using a new experimental setup, J. Phys. Chem. 95 (1991) 10760-10763.

[44]

T. Austad, S. Strand,Chemical flooding of reservoirs 4. Effects of temperature and pressure on the middle phase solubilization parameters close to optimum flood conditions, Colloid & Surf. A Physiochem. Eng. Asp. 108 (1996) 243-252.

[45]

F. Oukhemanou, T. Courtaud, M. Morvan, P. Moreau, P. Mougin, C. Fejean, N. Pedel, B. Bazin, R. Tabary, Alkaline-surfactant-polymer Formulation Evaluation in Live Oil Conditions: the Impact of Temperature, Pressure and Gas on Oil Recovery Performance, 2014 paper SPE 169130 presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 12e16 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

[46]

A. Goudarzi, M. Delshad, K. Sepehrnoor,A Critical Assessment of Several Reservoir Simulators for Modelling Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery Processes, 2013 paper SPE 163578 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Feb 18-20, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.

[47]

K.S. Chan, D.O. Shah, The physico-chemical conditions necessary to produce ultralow interfacial tension at the oil/brine interface, in: D.O. Shah (Ed.), Surface Phenomena in Enhanced Oil Recovery, Plenum, 1981, pp. 53-72.

[48]

W.-L. Kang, Study of Chemical Interactions and Drive Mechanisms in Daqing ASP Flooding, Petroleum Industry Press, 2001.

[49]

J.L. Salager, J.C. Morgan, R.S. Schechter, W.H. Wade, E. Vasquez, Optimum formulation of surfactant/water/oil systems for minimum interfacial tension or phase behavior, SPEJ 23 (April) (1979) 107-115.

[50]

R.C. Nelson, Further studies on phase relationships in chemical flooding, in: D.O. Shah (Ed.), Surface Phenomena in Enhanced Oil Recovery, Plenum Press, 1981, pp. 73-104.

[51]

S. Liu, R.F. Li, C. Miller, G.J. Hirasaki, ASP Processes: Wide Range of Conditions for Good Recovery, 2008 paper SPE 113936 presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 19e23 April.

[52]

L. Patacchini, R. de Loubens, A. Moncorge, A. Trouillaud, Four-fluid-phase, fully implicit simulation of surfactant flooding, SPEREE 17 (2) (2014) 271-285.

[53]

C.F. Chai, G. Adamson, S.W. Lo, B. Agarwal, S. Ritom, K. Du, W. Mekarapiruk, M. Jamaludin, N.A. Zakaria, A. Din, N. Azizan,St Joseph Chemical EOR Pilota Key De-risking Step Prior to offshore ASP Full Field Implementation, 2011 paper SPE 144594 presented at the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, 19e21 July, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

[54]

J.F. Tomich, R.L. Dalton Jr. H. A. Deans, L.K. Shallenberger, Single-well tracer method to measure residual oil saturation, J. Pet. Tech. 25 (2) (1973) 211-218.

[55]

W.W. Weiss, X. Xie, J. Weiss, V. Subramanium, A. Taylor, F. Edens, Artificial intelligence used to evaluate 23 single-well surfactant-soak treatments, SPEREE (June) (2006) 209-216.

[56]

X. Xie, W.W. Weiss, Z. Tong, N.R. Morrow, Improved Oil Recovery from Carbonate, 2005.

[57]

H.L. Chen, L.R. Lucas, L.A.D. Nogaret, H.D. Yang, D.E. Kenyon, Laboratory monitoring of surfactant imbibition with computerized tomography, SPEREE (February) (2001) 16-25.

[58]

H.D. Yang, E.E. Wadleigh, Dilute Surfactant IOR e Design Improvement for Massive, Fractured Carbonate Applications, 2000 paper SPE 59009 presented at the SPE International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition in Mexico, 1e3 February, Villahermosa, Mexico.

[59]

R.E. Johnson, R.G. Kennelly, J.R. Schwarz, Chemical and physical applications in treating produced-fluid emulsions of the Bell creek micellar/polymer flood, SPEPE 3 (2) (1988) 210-216.

[60]

R.C. Whiteley, J.W. Ware, Low-tension waterflood pilot at the Salem unit, Marion County, Illinois Part 1: field implementation and results, J. Pet. Tech. 29 (8) (1977) 925-932.

[61]

B. Gall, R. Dobson Sr. F. Lave, R. Bryant, T. French, M. Stafford,Field Pilot Test Results for a Permeability Modification Treatment Using a Gelled Surfactant Chemical System, 1997 paper SPE 38906 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 5e8 October, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

[62]

S.A. Hong, J.H. Bae, Field Experiment of lignosulfonate preflushing for surfactant adsorption reduction, SPERE 5 (4) (1990) 467-474.

[63]

J.J. Sheng, A comprehensive review of alkalineesurfactantepolymer (ASP) flooding, Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 9 (2014) 471-489.

[64]

H.-Z. Wang, G.-Z. Liao, J. Song, Combined chemical flooding technologies, in: P. P. Shen (Ed.), Technological Developments in Enhanced Oil Recovery, Petroleum Industry Press, 2006, pp. 126-188.

[65]

F. Zhang, D. Ma, Q. Wang, Y. Zhu, W. Luo,A Novel Hydroxylpropyl Sulfobetaine Surfactant for High Temperature and High Salinity Reservoirs, 2013 paper SPE 17022 presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, 26e28 March, Beijing, China.

[66]

R. Tabary, F. Douarche, B. Bazin, P.M. Lemouzy, P.R. Moreau, M.R. Morvan, Design of a Surfactant/Polymer Process in a Hard Brine Context: a Case Study Applied to Bramberge Reservoir, 2012 paper SPE 155106 presented at the SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, 16e18 April, Muscat, Oman.

[67]

J.J. Sheng, Critical review of low-salinity waterflooding, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 120 (2014) 216-224.

[68]

A. Seethepalli, B. Adibhatla, K.K. Mohanty, Physicochemical interactions during surfactant flooding of fractured carbonate reservoirs, SPE J. (December) (2004) 411-418.

[69]

G. Hirasaki, D.L. Zhang, Surface chemistry of oil recovery from fractured, oil-wet, carbonate formations, SPE J. (June) (2004) 151-162.

[70]

G.J. Hirasaki, Application of the theory of multicomponent, multiphase displacement to three-component, two-phase surfactant flooding, SPEJ (April) (1981) 191-204.

[71]

T. Austad, D.C. Standnes, Spontaneous imbibition of water into oil-wet carbonates, J. Pet. Sci. Technol. 39 (2003) 363-376.

[72]

D.C. Standnes, T. Austad, Wettability alteration in chalk 2. Mechanism for wettability alteration from oil-wet to water-wet using surfactants, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 28 (2002) 123-143.

[73]

V. Mirchi, S. Saraji, L. Goual, M. Piri, Dynamic Interfacial Tensions and Contact Angles of Surfactant-in-Brine/Oil/Shale Systems: Implications to Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale Oil Reservoirs, 2014 paper SPE 169171 presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 12e16 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

[74]

Z.D. Phillips, R.J. Halverson, S.R. Strauss, J.M. Layman II, T.W. Green, A Case Study in the Bakken Formation: Changes to Hydraulic Fracture Stimulation Treatments Result in Improved Oil Production and Reduced Treatment Costs, 2007 paper SPE 108045 presented the Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Technology Symposium, 16e18 April, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A.

[75]

D. Wang, R. Butler, H. Liu, S. Ahmed, Flow-rate behavior and imbibition in shale, SPEREE 14 (4) (2011) 485-492.

[76]

P. Shuler, H. Tang, Z. Lu, Y. Tang, Chemical Process for Improved Oil Recovery from Bakken Shale, 2011 paper SPE 147531 presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 15e17 November.

[77]

S. Takahashi, A.R. Kovscek, Wettability estimation of low-permeability, siliceous shale using surface forces, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 75 (1-2) (2010) 33-43.

[78]

NPC, Enhanced Oil Recovery (Report), National Petroleum Congress, 1976.

[79]

NPC, Enhanced Oil Recovery (Report), National Petroleum Congress, 1984.

[80]

M.A. Al-Bahar, R. Merrill, W. Peake, M. Jumaa, R. Oskui,Evaluation of IOR Potential within Kuwait, 2004. Paper SPE 88716 presented at the Abu Dhabi International Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 10e13 October, 2004.

[81]

J.L. Dickson, A. Leahy-Dios, P.L. Wylie,Development of Improved Hydrocarbon Recovery Screening Methodologies, 2010 paper SPE 129768 presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 24e28 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 2010.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/