Optimization of huff-n-puff gas injection in shale oil reservoirs

Abstract

Earlier studies show that huff-n-puff injection is preferred to continuous gas flooding to improve liquid oil production in shale oil reservoirs. Compared to gas flooding, huff-n-puff has more operational parameters to optimize so that liquid oil production can be maximized. This paper is to discuss the optimum huff-n-puff times, number of cycles and soaking time under practical operational and reservoir conditions. The operational and reservoir conditions dictate the maximum injection and production rates, and the maximum injection pressure and minimum production pressure.

The numerical simulation results and discussions show that the optimum huff time is so long that the pressure near the wellbore reaches the set maximum injection pressure during the huff period; and the optimum puff time is the time required for the pressure near the wellbore to reach the set minimum production pressure during the puff period. The benefits of soaking may not compensate the loss in injection and production due to the time lost in the soaking period. Therefore, soaking may not be necessary during the huff-n-puff gas injection in shale oil reservoirs. The number of huff-n-puff cycles is determined when an economic rate cut-off is reached.

Acknowledgements

The work presented in this paper is Supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-FE0024311.

References

[1] J.J. Sheng, Enhanced oil recovery in shale reservoirs by gas injection, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 22 (2015) 252e259 (invited review).

[2] J.J. Sheng, T. Cook, W. Barnes, F. Mody, M. Watson, M. Porter, H. Viswanathan,Screening of the EOR potential of a Wolfcamp shale oil reservoir, in:Paper ARMA15-438 Presented at the 49th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium Held in San Francisco, CA, USA, 28 Junee 1 July, 2015.

[3] T. Wan, J.J. Sheng, M.Y. Soliman,Evaluation of the EOR potential in shale oil reservoirs by cyclic gas injection, in:Paper SPWLA-D-12- 00119 Presented at the SPWLA 54th Annual Logging Symposium Held in New Orleans, Louisiana, 22e26 June, 2013.

[4] J.J. Sheng, K. Chen, Evaluation of the EOR potential of gas and water injection in shale oil reservoirs, J. Unconv. Oil Gas Resour. 5 (2014) 1-9.

[5] C. Chen, M.T. Balhoff, K.K. Mohanty, Effect of reservoir heterogeneity on primary recovery and CO₂ huff ‘n’ puff recovery in shale-oil reservoirs, SPEREE 17 (3) (2014) 404-413.

[6] B. Kurtoglu, Integrated Reservoir Characterization and Modeling in Support of Enhanced Oil Recovery for Bakken, PhD dissertation, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, 2013.

[7] W. Yu, H. Lashgari, K. Sepehrnoori,Simulation study of CO2 huff-n-puff process in Bakken tight oil reservoirs, in: Paper SPE 169575 Presented at the SPE Western North American and Rocky Mountain Joint Meeting, 17-18 April, Denver, Colorado, USA, 2014.

[8] Computer Modeling Group, GEM User Guide, Compositional & Unconventional Reservoir Simulator, Calgary, Alberta,Canada, 2014.

[9] S. Shoaib, B.T. Hoffman, CO₂ flooding the Elm Coulee field, in: Paper SPE 123176 Presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Petroleum Technology Conference, 14-16 April, Denver, Colorado, 2009.

[10] X. Wang, P. Luo, V. Er, S.-S.S. Huang, Assessment of CO₂ flooding potential for Bakken formation, Saskatchewan, in: Paper SPE 137728 Presented at the SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, 19-21 October, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2010.

[11] T.G. Monger, J.M. Coma, A laboratory and field evaluation of the CO₂ process for light oil recovery, SPE Res. Eng. 3 (4) (1988) 1168-1176.

[12] T.D. Gamadi, J.J. Sheng, M.Y. Soliman,An experimental study of cyclic gas injection to improve shale oil recovery, in:Paper SPE 166334 Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Held in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 30 Septembere2 October, 2013.

[13] Y. Yu, J.J. Sheng,An experimental investigation of the effect of pressure depletion rate on oil recovery from shale cores by cyclic N2 injection, in:Paper URTeC 2144010 Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference Held in San Antonio, Texas, USA, 20e22 July, 2015.

[14] J.J. Sheng, Increase liquid oil production by huff-n-puff of produced gas in shale gas condensate reservoirs, J. Unconv. Oil Gas Resour. 11 (2015) 19-26.

[15] T. Wan, J.J. Sheng, M.Y. Soliman,Evaluation of the EOR potential in fractured shale oil reservoirs by cyclic gas injection, in:Paper SPE 168880 or URTeC 1611383 Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference Held in Denver, Colorado, USA, 12-14 August, 2013.

[16] T. Wan, X. Meng, J.J. Sheng, M. Watson,Compositional modeling of EOR process in stimulated shale oil reservoirs by cyclic gas injection, in:Paper SPE 169069 Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 12e16 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 2014.

[17] T. Wan, Y. Yu, J.J. Sheng,Comparative study of enhanced oil recovery efficiency by CO₂ injection and CO2 huff-n-puff in stimulated shale oil reservoirs, in: Paper 358937 Presented at the AIChE Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 16-21 November, 2014.

[18] T. Wan, J.J. Sheng, Evaluation of the EOR potential in hydraulically fractured shale oil reservoirs by cyclic gas injection, Petroleum Sci. Technol. 33 (2015) 812-818.

[19] X.Meng, Y. Yu, J.J. Sheng, M.Watson, F.Mody,An experimental study on huffn-puff gas injection to enhance condensate recovery in shale gas reservoirs, in:Paper URTeC 2153322 Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference Held in San Antonio, Texas, USA, 20e22 July, 2015.

[20] E. Artun, T. Ertekin, R. Watson, B. Miller, Performance evaluation of cyclic pressure pulsing in a depleted, naturally fractured reservoir with stripperwell production, Pet. Sci. Technol. 29 (2011) 953-965.

[21] T. Wan, Y. Yu, J.J. Sheng, Experimental and numerical study of the EOR potential in liquid-rich shales by cyclic gas injection, J. Unconv. Oil Gas Resour. 12 (2015) 56-67.