The hybrid MPC-MINLP algorithm for optimal operation of coal-fired power plants with solvent based post-combustion CO₂ capture

Abstract

This paper presents an algorithm that combines model predictive control (MPC) with MINLP optimization and demonstrates its application for coal-fired power plants retrofitted with solvent based post-combustion CO₂ capture (PCC) plant. The objective function of the optimization algorithm works at a primary level to maximize plant economic revenue while considering an optimal carbon capture profile. At a secondary level, the MPC algorithm is used to control the performance of the PCC plant. Two techno-economic scenarios based on fixed (capture rate is constant) and flexible (capture rate is variable) operation modes are developed using actual electricity prices (2011) with fixed carbon prices ($AUD 5, 25, 50/tonne-CO₂) for 24 h periods. Results show that fixed operation mode can bring about a ratio of net operating revenue deficit at an average of 6% against the superior flexible operation mode.

Keywords

Carbon capture / PCC / Flexible operation / Modeling / Algorithm / Optimization

References

[1] Electric Power from Competitive Sources,Ultra-Systems Technology Pty Ltd, Darra, Australia, 1999.

[2] R.E.H. Ooi, D.C.Y. Foo, D.K.S. Ng, R.R. Tan, Planning of carbon capture and storage with pinch analysis techniques, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 91 (Dec 2013) 2721-2731.

[3] X. Zhang, I.J. Duncan, G. Huang, G. Li, Identification of management strategies for CO₂ capture and sequestration under uncertainty through inexact modeling, Appl. Energy 113 (Jan 2014) 310-317.

[4] R. Khalilpour, Flexible operation scheduling of a power plant integrated with PCC processes under market dynamics, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53 (May 2014) 8132-8146.

[5] R. Khalilpour, Multi-level investment planning and scheduling under electricity and carbon market dynamics: retrofit of a power plant with PCC (post-combustion carbon capture) processes, Energy 64 (Jan 2014) 172-186.

[6] A. Qadir, M. Sharma, F. Parvareh, R. Khalilpour, A. Abbas, Flexible dynamic operation of solar-integrated power plant with solvent based postcombustion carbon capture (PCC) process, Energy Convers. Manag. 97 (Jun 2015) 7-19.

[7] N. Mac Dowell, N. Shah, The multi-period optimisation of an amine-based CO₂ capture process integrated with a super-critical coal-fired power station for flexible operation, Comput. Chem. Eng. 74 (April 2015) 169-183.

[8] M. Zaman, J.H. Lee, Optimization of the various modes of flexible operation for post-combustion CO₂ capture plant, Comput. Chem. Eng. 75 (April 2015) 14-27.

[9] P.C. Van der Wijk, A.S. Brouwer, M. van den Broek, T. Slot, G. Stienstra, W. van der Veen, et al., Benefits of coal-fired power generation with flexible CCS in a future northwest European power system with large scale wind power, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 28 (Sept 2014) 216-233.

[10] S.M. Cohen, G.T. Rochelle, M.E. Webber, Optimal operation of flexible postcombustion CO₂ capture in response to volatile electricity prices,in: 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, vol. 4, 2011, pp. 2604-2611.

[11] H. Chalmers, M. Leach, J. Gibbins, Built-in flexibility at retrofitted power plants: what is it worth and can we afford to ignore it?, in:10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, vol. 4, 2011, pp. 2596-2603.

[12] D.E. Wiley, M.T. Ho, L. Donde, Technical and economic opportunities for flexible CO₂ capture at Australian black coal fired power plants, Energy Procedia 4 (2011) 1893-1900.

[13] A. Arce, N. Mac Dowell, N. Shah, L.F. Vega, Flexible operation of solvent regeneration systems for CO₂ capture processes using advanced control techniques: towards operational cost minimisation, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 11 (Nov 2012) 236-250.

[14] Z. Li, M. Sharma, R. Khalilpour, A. Abbas, Optimal operation of solventbased post-combustion carbon capture processes with reduced models, Energy Procedia 37 (2013) 1500-1508.

[15] N. Abdul Manaf, A. Qadir, A. Abbas, Temporal multiscalar decision support framework for flexible operation of carbon capture plants targeting lowcarbon management of power plant emissions, Appl. Energy, vol. 169, pp. 912-926, 5/1/2016.

[16] Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO). <http://www.aemo.com.au> [access 10.06.14]”.

[17] C. Biliyok, A. Lawal, M.H. Wang, F. Seibert, Dynamic modelling, validation and analysis of post-combustion chemical absorption CO₂ capture plant, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 9 (Jul 2012) 428-445.

[18] M.Y. Lee, H. Hashim, Modelling and optimization of CO₂ abatement strategies, J. Clean. Prod. 71 (May 2014) 40-47.

[19] Z. Wang, G.H. Huang, Y.P. Cai, C. Dong, H.G. Sun, The identification of optimal Co2 emissions-trading strategies based on an inexact two-stage chance-constrained programming approach, Int. J. Green Energy 11 (Mar 16 2014) 302-319.

[20] R. Anantharaman, S. Roussanaly, S.F. Westman, J. Husebye, Selection of optimal CO₂ capture plant capacity for better investment decisions, Ghgt- 11 37 (2013) 7039-7045.

[21] J. Cristóbal, G. Guillén-Gosálbez, L. Jiménez, A. Irabien, MINLP model for optimizing electricity production from coal-fired power plants considering carbon management, Energy Policy 51 (Dec 2012) 493-501.

[22] H. Hashim, P. Douglas, A. Elkamel, E. Croiset, Optimization model for energy planning with CO₂ emission considerations, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (Feb 2005) 879-890.