Chemical-assisted MMP reduction on methane-oil systems: Implications for natural gas injection to enhanced oil recovery

Abstract

Miscible natural gas injection is widely considered as a practical and efficient enhanced oil recovery technique. However, the main challenge in this process is the high minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) between natural gas and crude oil, which limits its application and recovery factor, especially in high-temperature reservoirs. Therefore, we present a novel investigation to quantify the effect of chemical-assisted MMP reduction on the oil recovery factor. Firstly, we measured the interfacial tension (IFT) of the methane-oil system in the presence of chemical or CO₂ to calculate the MMP reduction at a constant temperature (373K) using the vanishing interfacial tension (VIT) method. Afterwards, we performed three coreflooding experiments to quantify the effect of MMP reduction on the oil recovery factor under different injection scenarios.

The interfacial tension measurements show that adding a small fraction (1.5 wt%) of the tested surfactant (SOLOTERRA ME-6) achieved 9% of MMP reduction, while adding 20 wt% of CO₂ to the methane yields 13% of MMP reduction. Then, the coreflooding results highlight the significance of achieving miscibility during gas injection, as the ultimate recovery factor increased from 65.5% under immiscible conditions to 77.2% using chemical-assisted methane, and to 79% using gas mixture after achieving near miscible condition. The results demonstrate the promising potential of the MMP reduction to significantly increase the oil recovery factor during gas injection. Furthermore, these results will likely expand the application envelop of the miscible gas injection, in addition to the environmental benefits of utilizing the produced gas by re-injection/recycling instead of flaring which contributes to reducing the greenhouse gas emissions.

Keywords

Gas injection / Enhanced oil recovery / Miscibility / Coreflooding

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by a joint project with Southwest Petroleum University (China) funded by Tarim Oilfield Company (PetroChina).

References

[1] A.O. Gbadamosi, et al., An overview of chemical enhanced oil recovery: recent advances and prospects, Int. Nano Lett. 9 (2019) 171-202, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40089-019-0272-8.

[2] M.S. Kamal, et al., Recent advances in nanoparticles enhanced oil recovery: rheology, interfacial tension, oil recovery, and wettability alteration, J. Nanomater. (2017) 1-15, 2017.

[3] V. Alvarado, E. Manrique, Enhanced oil recovery: an update review, Energies 3 (9) (2010) 1529-1575.

[4] I.E. Agency, World Energy Outlook, 2019, 2019.

[5] F.I. Stalkup Jr., Status of miscible displacement, J. Petrol. Technol. 35 (4) (1983) 815-826.

[6] A.N. El-hoshoudy, S. Desouky, CO₂ miscible flooding for enhanced oil recovery, in: Carbon Capture, Utilization and Sequestration, 2018.

[7] M. Perera, et al., A review of CO2-enhanced oil recovery with a simulated sensitivity analysis, Energies 9 (7) (2016).

[8] M. Agista, K. Guo, Z. Yu, A state-of-the-art review of nanoparticles application in petroleum with a focus on enhanced oil recovery, Appl. Sci. 8 (6) (2018).

[9] L. Jin, et al., Impact of CO 2 impurity on MMP and oil recovery performance of the bell creek oil field, Energy Proc. 114 (2017) 6997-7008.

[10] R. Al-Mjeni, et al., Has the time come for EOR? Oilfield Rev. 22 (2010) 16-35.

[11] M. Godec, et al., CO 2 storage in depleted oil fields: the worldwide potential for carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery, Energy Proc. 4 (2011) 2162-2169.

[12] K. Zhang, N. Jia, F. Zeng, Application of predicted bubble-rising velocities for estimating the minimum miscibility pressures of the light crude oileCO₂ systems with the rising bubble apparatus, Fuel 220 (2018) 412-419.

[13] T.W. Teklu, et al., Low salinity watereSurfactanteCO₂ EOR, Petroleum 3 (3) (2017) 309-320.

[14] S.G. Ghedan, Global laboratory experience of CO2-EOR flooding, in: SPE/EAGE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2009, p. 15.

[15] H. Yongmao, et al., Laboratory investigation of CO 2 flooding,in:Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Abuja, Nigeria, 2004, p. 6.

[16] S. Li, et al., Diffusion behavior of supercritical CO₂ in micro-to nanoconfined pores, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58 (47) (2019) 21772-21784.

[17] K. Zhang, L. Liu, G. Huang, Nanoconfined water effect on CO₂ utilization and geological storage, Geophys. Res. Lett. 47 (15) (2020).

[18] G.F. Teletzke, P.D. Patel, A. Chen,Methodology for miscible gas injection EOR screening, in:SPE International Improved Oil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific, Society of Petroleum Engineers: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2005, p. 11.

[19] X. Wang, Y. Gu, Oil recovery and permeability reduction of a tight sandstone reservoir in immiscible and miscible CO₂ flooding processes, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50 (4) (2011) 2388-2399.

[20] M. Cao, Y. Gu, Physicochemical characterization of produced oils and gases in immiscible and miscible CO₂ flooding processes, Energy Fuels 27 (1) (2013) 440-453.

[21] M.M. Kulkarni, D.N. Rao, Experimental investigation of miscible and immiscible Water-Alternating-Gas (WAG) process performance, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 48 (1-2) (2005) 1-20.

[22] M. Cao, Y. Gu, Oil recovery mechanisms and asphaltene precipitation phenomenon in immiscible and miscible CO₂ flooding processes, Fuel 109 (2013) 157-166.

[23] A. Abedini, F. Torabi, Oil recovery performance of immiscible and miscible CO₂ huff-and-puff processes, Energy Fuels 28 (2) (2014) 774-784.

[24] S. Thomas, Enhanced oil recovery -an overview, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. Rev. l'IFP 63 (1) (2007) 9-19.

[25] R. Terry, Enhanced Oil Recovery, 2003, pp. 503-518.

[26] R.J. Watts, C.A. Komar, Gas Miscible Displacement Enhanced Oil Recovery: Technology Status Report, 1989. United States.

[27] B. Jia, J.-S. Tsau, R. Barati, A review of the current progress of CO₂ injection EOR and carbon storage in shale oil reservoirs, Fuel 236 (2019) 404-427.

[28] S.B. Hawthorne, et al., Effects of reservoir temperature and percent levels of methane and ethane on CO2/oil MMP values as determined using vanishing interfacial tension/capillary rise, Energy Proc. 114 (2017) 5287-5298.

[29] M. Fathinasab, et al., Minimum miscibility pressure and interfacial tension measurements for N2 and CO₂ gases in contact with W/O emulsions for different temperatures and pressures, Fuel 225 (2018) 623-631.

[30] M. Nobakht, S. Moghadam, Y. Gu, Mutual interactions between crude oil and CO₂ under different pressures, Fluid Phase Equil. 265 (1-2) (2008) 94-103.

[31] H. Norouzi, et al., Analysis of secondary and tertiary high-pressure gas injection at different miscibility conditions: mechanistic study, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 22 (1) (2019) 150-160.

[32] N. Zhang, M. Wei, B. Bai, Statistical and analytical review of worldwide CO₂ immiscible field applications, Fuel 220 (2018) 89-100.

[33] Z. Yang, et al., Reducing the minimum miscibility pressure of CO₂ and crude oil using alcohols, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 568 (2019) 105-112.

[34] A. Al Adasani, B. Bai, Analysis of EOR projects and updated screening criteria, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 79 (1-2) (2011) 10-24.

[35] J.J. Taber, F.D. Martin, R.S. Seright, EOR screening criteria revisiteddPart 2: applications and impact of oil prices, SPE Reservoir Eng. 12 (3) (1997) 199-206.

[36] Y. Yang, et al., Improving oil recovery in the CO₂ flooding process by utilizing nonpolar chemical modifiers, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 24 (5) (2016) 646-650.

[37] B. Moradi, et al., Effects of alcohols on interfacial tension between carbon dioxide and crude oil at elevated pressures and temperature, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 121 (2014) 103-109.

[38] J. Liu, et al., Experimental study on reducing CO₂-oil minimum miscibility pressure with hydrocarbon agents, Energies 12 (10) (2019).

[39] P. Guo, et al., Use of oil-soluble surfactant to reduce minimum miscibility pressure, Petrol. Sci. Technol. 35 (4) (2017) 345-350.

[40] C.L.V.a.M. Awang, reduction of MMP using oleophilic chemicals. World academy of science, Eng. Technol. Int. J. Chem. Mol. Eng. 8 (2014).

[41] H. Luo, et al., Effects of the non-ionic surfactant (CiPOj) on the interfacial tension behavior between CO₂ and crude oil, Energy Fuels 32 (6) (2018) 6708-6712.

[42] C. Zhang, et al., A novel system for reducing CO2-crude oil minimum miscibility pressure with CO2-soluble surfactants, Fuel (2020) 281.

[43] M. Almobarak, et al., A Review of Chemical-Assisted Minimum Miscibility Pressure Reduction in CO₂ Injection for Enhanced Oil Recovery, Petroleum, 2021.

[44] S.B. Hawthorne, et al., Experimental determinations of minimum miscibility pressures using hydrocarbon gases and CO₂ for crude oils from the bakken and cut bank oil reservoirs, Energy Fuels 34 (5) (2020) 6148-6157.

[45] M. Almobarak, et al., Chemical-assisted minimum miscibility pressure reduction between oil and methane, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. (2021) 196.

[46] P.Y. Zhang, et al., Effect of CO 2 impurities on gas-injection EOR processes,in:SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 2004, p. 11.

[47] P. Cheng, et al., Automation of axisymmetric drop shape-analysis for measurement of interfacial-tensions and contact angels, Colloid. Surface. 43 (1990) 151-167.

[48] S.M.I. Saad, A.W. Neumann, Axisymmetric drop shape analysis (ADSA): an outline, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 238 (2016) 62-87.

[49] K. Zhang, N. Jia, Confined fluid interfacial tension calculations and evaluations in nanopores, Fuel 237 (2019) 1161-1176.

[50] D.N. Rao, J.I. Lee, Application of the new vanishing interfacial tension technique to evaluate miscibility conditions for the Terra Nova Offshore Project, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 35 (3) (2002) 247-262.

[51] S.B. Hawthorne, et al., Rapid and simple capillary-rise/vanishing interfacial tension method to determine crude oil minimum miscibility pressure: pure and mixed CO2, methane, and ethane, Energy Fuels 30 (8) (2016) 6365-6372.

[52] D.N. Rao, A new technique of vanishing interfacial tension for miscibility determination, Fluid Phase Equil. 139 (1) (1997) 311-324.

[53] W. Ahmad, et al., Experimental determination of minimum miscibility pressure, Procedia Eng. 148 (2016) 1191-1198.

[54] K. Zhang, et al., A review of experimental methods for determining the Oil-Gas minimum miscibility pressures, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. (2019) 183.

[55] M. Ghorbani, et al., Modified vanishing interfacial tension (VIT) test for CO₂-oil minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) measurement, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 20 (2014) 92-98.

[56] N.M. Al Hinai, et al., Effects of oligomers dissolved in CO₂ or associated gas on IFT and miscibility pressure with a gas-light crude oil system, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. (2019) 181.

[57] J. Sheng, Enhanced Oil Recovery Field Case Studies, 2013.

[58] M. Almobarak, et al., Effect of functional groups on chemical-assisted MMP reduction of a methane-oil system, Energy Fuels 35 (18) (2021) 14519-14526.

[59] D. Sequeira, Compositional Effects on Gas-Oil Interfacial Tension and Miscibility at Reservoir Conditions, 2006.

[60] B. Honarvar, et al., Experimental investigation of interfacial tension measurement and oil recovery by carbonated water injection: a case study using core samples from an Iranian carbonate oil reservoir, Energy Fuels 31 (3) (2017) 2740-2748.

[61] M.G. Rezk, J. Foroozesh,Phase behavior and fluid interactions of a CO2-Light oil system at high pressures and temperatures, Heliyon 5 (7) (2019), e02057.

[62] A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh, et al., Experimental determination of interfacial tension and miscibility of the CO₂-crude oil system; temperature, pressure, and composition effects, J. Chem. Eng. Data 59 (1) (2013) 61-69.

[63] Z. Yang, et al., Interfacial tension of CO₂ and crude oils under high pressure and temperature, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 482 (2015) 611-616.

[64] Z. Yang, et al., Dispersion property of CO2 in oil. 1. Volume expansion of CO2+ alkane at near critical and supercritical condition of CO2, J. Chem. Eng. Data 57 (3) (2012) 882-889.

[65] S. Gold, et al., Branched trichain sulfosuccinates as novel water in CO₂ dispersants, Colloid Polym. Sci. 284 (2006) 1333-1337.

[66] C. Negin, S. Ali, Q. Xie, Most common surfactants employed in chemical enhanced oil recovery, Petroleum 3 (2) (2017) 197-211.

[67] C.F. Kirby, M.A. McHugh, Phase behavior of polymers in supercritical fluid solvents, Chem. Rev. 99 (2) (1999) 565-602.

[68] M. Fathinasab, S. Ayatollahi, A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A rigorous approach to predict nitrogen-crude oil minimum miscibility pressure of pure and nitrogen mixtures, Fluid Phase Equil. 399 (2015) 30-39.

[69] M. Ding, et al., Potential to enhance CO₂ flooding in low permeability reservoirs by alcohol and surfactant as co-solvents, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. (2019) 182.

[70] F. Akintunji, et al., Contributors,in: J. J. Sheng (Ed.), Enhanced Oil Recovery Field Case Studies, Gulf Professional Publishing, Boston, 2013, p. xxi.

[71] A. Katende, F. Sagala, A critical review of low salinity water flooding: mechanism, laboratory and field application, J. Mol. Liq. 278 (2019) 627-649.

[72] W.B. Bartels, et al., Literature review of low salinity waterflooding from a length and time scale perspective, Fuel 236 (2019) 338-353.

[73] B. Shaker Shiran, A. Skauge, Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) by combined low salinity water/polymer flooding, Energy Fuels 27 (3) (2013) 1223-1235.

[74] H. Feng, et al., Assessment of miscibility effect for CO₂ flooding EOR in a low permeability reservoir, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 145 (2016) 328-335.

[75] L.W. Holm, V.A. Josendal, Mechanisms of Oil Displacement by Carbon Dioxide, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1974.

[76] P.Y.H. Zhang, S. Sayegh, X.L. Zhou, Effect of CO₂ Impurities on Gas-Injection EOR Processes, Society of Petroleum Engineers., 2004.

[77] S.B. Hawthorne, D.J. Miller, A comparison of crude oil hydrocarbon mobilization by vaporization gas drive into methane, ethane, and carbon dioxide at 15.6 MPa and 42°C, Fuel 249 (2019) 392-399.