Gene editing using CRISPR/Cas9: implications for dual-use and biosecurity

References

[1] Clapper J (2016) Director of National Intelligence Statement for the Record, Worldwide Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Community Senate Armed Services Committee.<Date>9 Feb 2016</Date>

[2] DiEuliis D, Giordano J (2017) Why gene editors like CRISPR/Cas9 may be a game-changer for neuroweapons. Health Secur 15(3):296–302

[3] Gerstein D, Giordano J (2017) Re-thinking the biological toxin and weapons convention? Health Secur 15(6):1–3

[4] Giordano J (2016) The neuroweapons threat. Bull Atomic Sci 72(3):1–4

[5] Giordano J (2017) Battlescape brain: engaging neuroscience in defense operations. HDIAC J 3(4):13–16

[6] Industry Association of Synthetic Biology (IASB) code of conduct for best practices in gene synthesis; https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/515024 . Accessed <Date>20 Oct 2017</Date>

[7] Kang XJ, Caparas CIN, Soh BS, Fan Y (2017) Addressing challenges in the clinical applications associated with CRISPR/Cas9 technology and ethical questions to prevent its misuse. Protein Cell 8:791–795

[8] Lanzilao E, Shook J, Benedikter R, Giordano J (2013) Advancing neuroscience on the 21st century world stage: the need for—and proposed structure of—an internationally relevant neuroethics. Ethics Biol Eng Med 4(3):211–229

[9] Mullin E (2017) Five ways to get CRISPR into the body. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/608898/five-ways-to-get-crispr-into-the-body/. Accessed <Date>Sept 2017</Date>

[10] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2017) Preparing for Future Products of Biotechnology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24605

[11] Palchik G, Chen C, Giordano J (2017) Monkey business? Development, influence and ethics of potentially dual-use brain science on the world stage. Neuroethics 10:1–4

[12] Protecting financial data in cyberspace, Carnegie Endowment. http://carnegieendowment.org/2017/08/24/protecting-financialdata-in-cyberspace-precedent-for-further-progress-on-cybernorms-pub-72907; Accessed <Date>21 Oct 2017</Date>

[13] Scheufele(2017) U.S. attitudes on human genome editing. Science 357:6351

[14] Talinn Manual, NATO. https://ccdcoe.org/research.html. Accessed <Date>20 Oct 2017</Date>

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2017 The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication