The moral imperative to continue gene editing research on human embryos

Julian Savulescu, Jonathan Pugh, Thomas Douglas, Christopher Gyngell

PDF(229 KB)
PDF(229 KB)
Protein Cell ›› 2015, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (7) : 476-479. DOI: 10.1007/s13238-015-0184-y
PERSPECTIVE
PERSPECTIVE

The moral imperative to continue gene editing research on human embryos

Author information +
History +

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Julian Savulescu, Jonathan Pugh, Thomas Douglas, Christopher Gyngell. The moral imperative to continue gene editing research on human embryos. Protein Cell, 2015, 6(7): 476‒479 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-015-0184-y

References

[1]
Annas GJ, Caplan A, Elias S (1996) The politics of human-embryo research—avoiding ethical gridlock. New Engl J Med 334(20): 1329−1332
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Baltimore BD, Berg P, Botchan M, Carroll D, Charo RA, Church G, Corn JE (2015) Biotechnology. A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification. Science 348: 36−38
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Bartke A, Brown-Borg H, Mattison J, Kinney B, Hauck S, Wright C (2001) Prolonged longevity of hypopituitary dwarf mice. Exp Gerontol 36: 21−28
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Bourne H, Douglas T, Savulescu J (2012) Procreative beneficence and in vitro gametogenesis. Monash Bioeth Rev 30: 29−48
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Christianson AL, Howson CP, Modell B (2006) March of dimes global report on birth defects. The March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, White Plains
[6]
Devolder K (2 005) Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells. J Med Ethics 31(6): 366−370
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Devolder K (2013) Killing discarded embryos and the nothing-is-lost principle. J Appl Philos 30(4): 289−303.
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Devolder K, Savulescu J (2005) The moral imperative to conduct embryonic stem cell and cloning research. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 15(1): 7−21
[9]
FitzPatrick W (2003) Surplus embryos, nonreproductive cloning, and the intend/foresee distinction. Hastings Center Rep 33(3): 29−36
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Iyer V, Shen B, Zhang W, Hodgkins A, Keane T, Huang X, Skarnes WC (2015) Off-target mutations are rare in Cas9-modified mice. Nat Methods 12(6): 479
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Lanphier E, Urnov F, Haecker SE, Werner M, Smolenski J (2015) Don’t edit the human germ line. Nature 519: 410−411
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Liang P, Xu Y, Zhang X, Ding C, Huang R, Zhang Z, Lv Jie (2015) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes. Protein Cell 6(5): 363−372
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Munné S, Cohen J (1998) Chromosome abnormalities in human embryos. Human Reproduction Update 4(6): 842−855
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
National Health and Medical Research Council (2007) NHMRC ethical guidelines on the use of assisted reproductive technology in clinical practice and research 39. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e78.pdf. Accessed 2015-May-27
[15]
Outka GH (2002) The ethics of human stem cell research. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 12(2): 175−213.
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
President’s Council on Bioethics (2002) Human cloning and human dignity: the report of the President’s Council on bioethics. PublicAffairs Reports, 1st edn. PublicAffairs, New York
[17]
Savulescu J (1999) Should we clone human beings? Cloning as a source of tissue for transplantation. J Med Ethics 25(2): 87−95
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Singer P (1993) Practical ethics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (pp 208−209; 226−228)
[19]
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (2008) Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2015 The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(229 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/