Stage dependent management of sleeve gastrectomy leaks - a systematic review with proposed classification and management algorithm
Mina Guirgis , Qiuye Cheng , Daniel Leonard Chan , Thomas James Opperman , Oliver M. Fisher , Michael Leonard Talbot
Metabolism and Target Organ Damage ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3) : 48
Stage dependent management of sleeve gastrectomy leaks - a systematic review with proposed classification and management algorithm
Aim: Gastric leak following foregut surgery remains a major challenge to clinicians. Treatment algorithms may vary between institutions often depending on clinician preference. The objective of this review is to assess the efficacy of different treatment strategies (i.e., endoscopic and surgical) for sleeve gastrectomy leaks across the literature, share our own centre’s experiences and attempt to implement an algorithm in managing sleeve leaks according to their severity as classified by a computed tomography-based staging system.
Methods: A comprehensive search of existing literature over the last decade was conducted using pre-defined criteria in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Sleeve gastrectomy leaks in the included studies were further categorized according to severity, prior to analysing the efficacy of treatment methods.
Results: Following review of 1,109 potential articles, 36 studies were included, involving a total of 1,246 sleeve leak patients. The mean age and body mass index of patients ranged from 33 to 46 years of age and 37 to 48 kg/m2, respectively. In type 1-2 leaks, surgical or radiological drainage followed by primary endoscopic therapy (i.e., stenting, internal drainage, over the scope clips, fibrin glue and/or E-VAC) was effective (leak resolution rates - 50%-100% between reporting papers). Endoscopic therapy remains a viable treatment option in treating type 3-4 leaks with success rates ranging from 33%-95%, although surgery (i.e., fistulo-jejunostomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or total gastrectomy) may be required in chronic leaks where all other modalities have failed.
Conclusion: Management of sleeve leaks should be driven by the underlying leak pathophysiology. Defining variables such as the size of the defect, size of any abscess/collection and presence of a stenosis can allow differing options to be applied. Patients who fail to respond appropriately can be escalated to alternate therapies with the aim of resuming per oral nutrition and minimizing inpatient stay.
Bariatric surgery / sleeve gastrectomy / gastric leak / postoperative complications / gastrointestinal endoscopy
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
Rached A, Basile M, El Masri H. Gastric leaks post sleeve gastrectomy: review of its prevention and management.World J Gastroenterol2014;20:13904-10 PMCID:PMC4194572 |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
Hajj G, Chemaly R. Fistula following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a proposed classification and algorithm for optimal management.Obes Surg2018;28:656-64 |
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
Del Campo SE, Mikami DJ, Needleman BJ, Noria SF. Endoscopic stent placement for treatment of sleeve gastrectomy leak: a single institution experience with fully covered stents.Surg Obes Relat Dis2018;14:453-61 |
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
van de Vrande S, Himpens J, El Mourad H, Debaerdemaeker R, Leman G. Management of chronic proximal fistulas after sleeve gastrectomy by laparoscopic Roux-limb placement.Surg Obes Relat Dis2013;9:856-61 |
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
Rosenthal RJ, Diaz AA, Arvidsson D, et al; International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of > 12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:8-19. |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
Li M, Zeng N, Liu Y, et al; Greater China Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Database (GC-MBD) study group. Management and outcomes of gastric leak after sleeve gastrectomy: results from the 2010-2020 national registry. Chin Med J. 2023;136:1967-76. PMCID:PMC10431592 |
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
Al Sabah S, Al Haddad E, Siddique I. Endoscopic management of post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy stenosis.Surg Endosc2017;31:3559-63 |
| [73] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |