Characteristics and health benefits of the probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii
Hadeel Edkaidek , Divakar Dahiya , Poonam Singh Nigam
Microbes & Immunity ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (4) : 26010001
Saccharomyces boulardii is a well-established probiotic yeast with documented clinical benefits for gastrointestinal health. This review highlights the key biotherapeutic mechanisms underlying its protective effects, with particular emphasis on its bioactive metabolites, including specialized enzymes, polyamines, organic acids, and vitamins. These postbiotic factors contribute to epithelial barrier reinforcement, immune modulation, and pathogen exclusion, thereby promoting intestinal homeostasis. In addition, S. boulardii supports microbial equilibrium through colonization resistance and regulation of inflammatory signaling pathways, including nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells. Clinical evidence demonstrates its efficacy in the prevention and management of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease, and irritable bowel syndrome. Safety considerations are also addressed, noting its biological distinction from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, particularly its inability to undergo hyphal transformation. Owing to its resilience against gastric acidity, bile salts, and concomitant antibiotic therapy, S. boulardii represents a valuable adjunct in contemporary gastrointestinal therapeutics and a promising platform for functional and translational applications.
Saccharomyces boulardii / Probiotic / Yeast / Bioactive / Metabolites / Enzymes / Microbiome / Functional foods
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
Terpou A, Dahiya D, Nigam PS. Evolving Dynamics of Fermented Food Microbiota and the Gut Microenvironment: Strategic Pathways to Enhance Human Health. Foods. 2025; 14(13):2361. doi: 10.3390/foods14132361 |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
Tomičić Z, Šarić L, |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
Igarashi K, |
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
McFarland L. Common organisms and probiotics: Saccharomyces boulardii. In: The Microbiota in Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology . Elsevier; 2017:145-164. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804024-9.00018-5 |
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
Xu X, Wu J, Jin Y, Huang K, Zhang Y, |
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
Ouwehand AC, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Probiotics: an overview of beneficial effects. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002; 82(1):279-289. doi: 10.1023/A:1020620607611 |
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
McFarland LV. Efficacy of single-strain probiotics versus multi-strain mixtures: systematic review of strain and disease specificity. Dig Dis Sci. 2021; 66(3):694-704. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06244-z |
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
Offei B, Vandecruys P, De Graeve S, Foulquié-Moreno MR, Thevelein JM. Unique genetic basis of the distinct antibiotic potency of high acetic acid production in the probiotic yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii. Genome Res. 2019; 29(9):1478-1494. doi: 10.1101/gr.243147.118 |
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
Buts J-P, Keyser ND. Transduction pathways regulating the trophic effects of Saccharomyces boulardii in rat intestinal mucosa. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010; 45(2):175-185. doi: 10.3109/00365520903453141 |
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
Szajewska H, Horvath A, |
| [91] |
McFarland LV. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of Saccharomyces boulardii in combination with standard antibiotics for Clostridium difficile disease. JAMA. 1994; 271:1913-1918. doi: 10.1001/jama.1994.03510480037031 |
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
|
| [115] |
Szajewska H, Guarino A, Hojsak I, |
| [116] |
|
| [117] |
|
| [118] |
|
| [119] |
|
| [120] |
|
| [121] |
|
| [122] |
|
| [123] |
|
| [124] |
|
| [125] |
Reale A, Mannina L, Tremonte P, |
| [126] |
|
| [127] |
|
| [128] |
|
| [129] |
|
| [130] |
Chaoui A, Faid M, |
| [131] |
|
| [132] |
|
| [133] |
|
| [134] |
|
| [135] |
|
| [136] |
|
| [137] |
|
| [138] |
|
| [139] |
|
| [140] |
|
| [141] |
|
| [142] |
|
| [143] |
|
| [144] |
|
| [145] |
|
| [146] |
|
| [147] |
|
| [148] |
|
| [149] |
|
| [150] |
|
| [151] |
|
| [152] |
|
| [153] |
|
| [154] |
Sougioultzis S, Simeonidis S, Bhaskar KR, |
| [155] |
|
| [156] |
|
| [157] |
|
| [158] |
|
| [159] |
|
| [160] |
|
| [161] |
|
| [162] |
|
| [163] |
|
| [164] |
|
| [165] |
|
| [166] |
|
| [167] |
|
| [168] |
|
| [169] |
|
| [170] |
Gedek. Adherence of Escherichia coli serogroup 0 157 and the Salmonella Typhimurium mutant DT 104 to the surface of Saccharomyces boulardii. Mycoses. 1999; 42(4):261-264. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0507.1999.00449.x |
| [171] |
|
| [172] |
|
| [173] |
|
| [174] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |