Influence of sugarcane bagasse ash on the workability and mechanical behaviour of 3D-printed mortar

Syed Muhammad Mudassir Zia , Yong Yuan , Muhammad Irfan-ul-Hassan , Ruyi Sheng , Imoleayo Oluwatoyin Fatoyinbo , Qiling Wang , Jiao-Long Zhang

Low-carbon Materials and Green Construction ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 4

PDF
Low-carbon Materials and Green Construction ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) :4 DOI: 10.1007/s44242-026-00100-5
Original Article
research-article
Influence of sugarcane bagasse ash on the workability and mechanical behaviour of 3D-printed mortar
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

3D-printed mortar (3DPM) is associated with significant cement consumption, which raises substantial environmental concerns. This study investigates the reuse of sugarcane bagasse ash (SBA), which has a high SiO2 content, in 3DPM to reduce carbon emissions and to promote sustainable development. The raw SBA was first dried and then ground. Then, five mixtures with varying SBA dosages, ranging from 0 to 20% cement replacement, were developed and tested. This study examines the effects of SBA on key properties of 3DPM, such as flowability, hydration kinetics, setting time, and compressive strength. The results indicate that increasing SBA content reduces the flowability of the mixtures. It significantly reduces the setting time from 207.5 min of the control mix to 49.5 min as the replacement ratio is 20% due to finer particles. The isothermal calorimeter test results indicate that SBA accelerates the cement hydration process, potentially reducing the usage of an accelerator in 3DPM. Including SBA in the mortar mix significantly increased compressive strength within the first 24 h and also up to 28 days. This accelerated reaction boosts the early-age strength development of the concrete mixture, making it especially suitable for applications that demand rapid strength gain.

Keywords

3D printed mortar / Utilization of agro-waste / Sugarcane bagasse ash / Early-age properties

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Syed Muhammad Mudassir Zia, Yong Yuan, Muhammad Irfan-ul-Hassan, Ruyi Sheng, Imoleayo Oluwatoyin Fatoyinbo, Qiling Wang, Jiao-Long Zhang. Influence of sugarcane bagasse ash on the workability and mechanical behaviour of 3D-printed mortar. Low-carbon Materials and Green Construction, 2026, 4(1): 4 DOI:10.1007/s44242-026-00100-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Xiao J, Liu H, Ding T, Ma G. 3D printed concrete components and structures: An overview. Sustainable Structures. 2021, 1. 2:000006

[2]

Riaz RD, Usman M, Ali A, Majid U, Faizan M, Malik UJ. Inclusive characterization of 3D printed concrete (3DPC) in additive manufacturing: A detailed review. Construction and Building Materials. 2023, 394. 132229

[3]

Jindal BB, Jangra P. 3D printed concrete: A comprehensive review of raw material’s properties, synthesis, performance, and potential field applications. Construction and Building Materials. 2023, 387. 131614

[4]

Han Y, Yang Z, Ding T, Xiao J. Environmental and economic assessment on 3D printed buildings with recycled concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021, 278. 123884

[5]

Tu H, Wei Z, Bahrami A, Kahla NB, Ahmad A, Ozkılıç YO. Recent advancements and future trends in 3D concrete printing using waste materials. Developments in the Built Environment. 2023, 16. 100187

[6]

Mohan MK, Rahul AV, Dam BV, Zeidan T, Schutter GD, Tittelboom KV. Performance criteria, environmental impact and cost assessment for 3D printable concrete mixtures. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2022, 181. 106255

[7]

Cicione A, Kruger J, Walls RS, Van Zijl G. An experimental study of the behavior of 3D printed concrete at elevated temperatures. Fire Safety Journal. 2021, 120. 103075

[8]

Jagadesh P, Ramachandramurthy A, Murugesan R. Evaluation of mechanical properties of sugar cane bagasse ash concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2018, 176: 608-617.

[9]

Ren P, Li B, Yu J, Ling T. Utilization of recycled concrete fines and powders to produce alkali-activated slag concrete blocks. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020, 267. 122115

[10]

Mistri A, Bhattacharyya SK, Dhami N, Mukherjee A, Barai SV. A review on different treatment methods for enhancing the properties of recycled aggregates for sustainable construction materials. Construction and Building Materials. 2020, 233. 117894

[11]

An D, Zhang Y, Yang R. Incorporating coarse aggregates into 3D concrete printing from mixture design and process control to structural behaviours and practical applications: A review. Virtual and Physical Prototyping. 2024, 19. e2351154

[12]

Yuan Y, Sheng R, Yao X, Pichler B, Mang HA, Zhang J. A three-step development strategy for 3D printable concrete containing coarse aggregates. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2025, 22. e04540

[13]

Liu Z, Li M, Weng Y, Wong TN, Tan MJ. Mixture design approach to optimize the rheological properties of the material used in 3D cementitious material printing. Construction and Building Materials. 2019, 198: 245-255.

[14]

Guo X, Yang J, Xiong G. Influence of supplementary cementitious materials on rheological properties of 3D printed fly ash based geopolymer. Cement Concrete Composite. 2020, 114. 103820

[15]

Wang Q, Ren X, Li J. Damage-rheology model for predicting 3D printed concrete buildability. Automation in Construction. 2023, 155. 105037

[16]

Gao H, Jin L, Chen Y, Chen Q, Liu X, Yu Q. Rheological behavior of 3D printed concrete: Influential factors and printability prediction scheme. Journal of Building Engineering. 2024, 91. 109626

[17]

Barbosa MS, dos Anjos MAS, Cabral KC, Dias LS. Development of composites for 3D printing with reduced cement consumption. Construction and Building Materials. 2022, 341. 127775

[18]

Wang H, Shen W, Sun X, Song X, Lin X. Influences of particle size on the performance of 3D printed coarse aggregate concrete: Experiment, microstructure, and mechanism analysis. Construction and Building Materials. 2025, 463. 140059

[19]

Yuan Y, Wang X, Zhang J, Tao Y, Tittelboom KV, Taerwe L, Schutter GD. The shear strength of the interface between artificial rock and printed concrete at super-early ages. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering. 2024, 18: 51-65.

[20]

Wangler T, Roussel N, Bos FP, Salet TAM, Flatt RJ. Digital concrete: A review. Cement and Concrete Research. 2019, 123. 105780

[21]

Yuan Y, Fatoyinbo IO, Sheng R, Wang Q, Zia SMM, Cui P, Zhang J. Advancing the applicability of recycled municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash as a cement substitute in printable concrete: Emphasis on rheological and microstructural properties. Journal of Building Engineering. 2025, 103. 112133

[22]

Shakor P, Nejadi S, Paul G, Malek S. Review of emerging additive manufacturing technologies in 3D printing of cementitious materials in the construction industry. Frontiers in Built Environment. 2019, 4. 85

[23]

Lu B, Weng Y, Li M, Qian Y, Leong KF, Tan MJ, Qian S. A systematical review of 3D printable cementitious materials. Construction Buildings and Materials. 2019, 207: 477-490.

[24]

Nerella VN, Nather M, Iqbal A, Butler M, Mechtcherine V. Inline quantification of extrudability of cementitious materials for digital construction. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2019, 95: 260-270.

[25]

Panda B, Ruan S, Unluer C, Tan MJ. Improving the 3D printability of high volume fly ash mixtures via the use of nano attapulgite clay. Composites Part B, Engineering. 2019, 165: 75-83.

[26]

Snellings R. Assessing, understanding and unlocking supplementary cementitious materials. RILEM Technical Letters. 2016, 1: 50-55.

[27]

Tao Y, Rahul AV, Lesage K, Tittelboom KV, Yuan Y, Schutter GD. Mechanical and microstructural properties of 3D printable concrete in the context of the twin-pipe pumping strategy. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2022, 125. 104324

[28]

Muthukrishnan S, Kua HW, Yu LN, Chung JKH. Fresh properties of cementitious materials containing rice husk ash for construction 3D printing. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2020, 32: 8.

[29]

Sugarcane production quantity - Food and agricultural organization. 2022. http://www.fao.org/faostat/zh/#data/QC

[30]

Bahurudeen A, Kanraj D, Dev VG, Santhanam M. Performance evaluation of sugarcane bagasse ash blended cement in concrete. Cement and Concrete Composite. 2015, 5977-88.

[31]

Ribeiro B, Yamamoto T, Yamashiki Y. Classifcation of the sugarcane residues and their characteristics—an environmental assessment of mortar with addition of sugarcane residues. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. 2021, 23: 1219-1226.

[32]

Mali AK, Nanthagopalan P. Development of a framework for the selection of best sugarcane bagasse ash from different sources for use in the cement-based system: A rapid and reliable path. Construction and Building Materials. 2021, 293. 123386

[33]

Quedou PG, Wirquin E, Bokhoree C. Sustainable concrete: Potency of sugarcane bagasse ash as a cementitious material in the construction industry. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2021, 14. e00545

[34]

Chaiyotha D, Kantawong W, Payakaniti P, Pinitsoontorn S, Chindaprasirt P. Finding optimized conditions for 3D printed high-calcium fly ash based alkali-activated mortar. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2023, 18. e01976

[35]

Thomas BS, Yang J, Bahurudeen A, Abdalla JA, Hawileh RA, Hamada HM, Nazar S, Jittin V, Ashish DK. Sugarcane bagasse ash as supplementary cementitious material in concrete - a review. Materials Today Sustainability. 2021, 15. 100086

[36]

Aziz I, Hassan MI, Haq E, Abbass W. Development of geopolymer foam concrete incorporating sugarcane bagasse ash and fly ash; 100% recycled and cement-less concrete. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2023, 48: 5655-5665.

[37]

Hiranobe CT, Gomes AS, Paiva FFG, Tolosa GR, Paim LL, Dognani G, Cardim GP, Cardim HP, dos Santos RJ, Cabrera FC. Sugarcane bagasse: Challenges and opportunities for waste recycling. Clean Technologies. 2024, 6: 662-699.

[38]

Hoang AT, Ong HC, Fattah IMR, Chong CT, Cheng CK, Sakthivel R, Ok YS. Progress on the lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis for biofuel production toward environmental sustainability. Fuel Processing Technology. 2021, 223. 106997

[39]

Yaseen N, Hassan MI, Saeed AR, Rizwan SA, Afzal M. Sustainable Development and Performance Assessment of Clay-Based Geopolymer Bricks Incorporating Fly Ash and Sugarcane Bagasse Ash. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2022, 34: 4.

[40]

Mehmood A, Hassan MI, Yaseen N. Recent advancements and future trends in 3D concrete printing using waste materials. Journal of Building Engineering. 2022, 62. 105279

[41]

Scrivener K, Snellings R, Lothenbach B. A practical guide to microstructural analysis of cementitious materials. 2015Taylor and Francis

[42]

Yuan, Y., Zia, S. M. M., Sheikh, T. M., Hassan, M. I., Yao, X., Zhu, H., & Zhang, J. (2026). Enhancing interlayer bond strength of 3D-printed concrete through microstructural densification by means of incorporating sugarcane bagasse ash, Structures, 86, 111307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2026.111307

[43]

Wang X, Tittelboom KV, Zhang J, Tao Y, Rong Y, Taerwe L, Schutter GD, Yuan Y. The time-dependent interfacial adhesion between artificial rock and fresh mortar modified by nanoclay. Nanomaterials. 2024, 14. 776

[44]

ASTM. (2007). Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar (ASTM C 1437). ASTM International.

[45]

Li W, Guo L, Liu G, Pan A, Zhang T. Analytical and experimental investigation of the relationship between spread and yield stress in the mini-cone test for cemented tailings backfill. Construction and Building Materials. 2020, 260. 119770

[46]

ASTM. (2014). Standard Practice for Measuring Hydration Kinetics of Hydraulic Cementitious Mixtures Using Isothermal Calorimetry (ASTM C 1679). ASTM International.

[47]

General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. (2011). Test methods for water requirement of normal consistency, setting time, and soundness of the Portland cement (GB/T 1346-2011.). Standards Press of China.

[48]

Industry Standard of the People’s Republic of China. (2009). Standard for test method of basic properties of construction mortars (JGJ/T 70-2009). Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China.

[49]

British Standards Institution. (2019). Testing hardened concrete Part 3 Compressive strength of test specimens (BS EN 12390-3: 2019). British Standards Institution.

[50]

Tay YWD, Qian Y, Tan MJ. Printability region for 3D concrete printing using slump and slump flow test. Composites Part B, Engineering. 2019.

[51]

Tripathy A, Acharya PK. Characterization of bagasse ash and its sustainable use in concrete as a supplementary binder – A review. Construction and Building Materials. 2022, 322. 126391

[52]

Khawaja SA, Javed U, Zafar T, Riaz M, Zafar MS, Khan MK. Eco-friendly incorporation of sugarcane bagasse ash as partial replacement of sand in foam concrete. Cleaner Engineering and Technology. 2021, 4. 100164

[53]

Tao Y, Mohan MK, Rahul AV, Yuan Y, De Schutter G, Tittelboom KV. Stiffening controllable concrete modified with redispersible polymer powder for twin-pipe printing. Cement and Concrete Research. 2022, 161. 106953

[54]

Kazmi SMS, Munir MJ, Patnaikuni I, Wua YF. Pozzolanic reaction of sugarcane bagasse ash and its role in controlling alkali-silica reaction. Construction and Building Materials. 2017, 148231-240.

[55]

Hubler MH, Thomas JJ, Jennings HM. Influence of nucleation seeding on the hydration kinetics and compressive strength of alkali-activated slag paste. Cement and Concrete Research. 2011, 41: 842-846.

[56]

Bentz DP, Aitcin PC. The hidden meaning of water-cement ratio. ACI Concrete International. 2008, 30: 51-54

[57]

Arshad S, Sharif MB, Hassan MI, Khan M, Zhang J. Efficiency of supplementary cementitious materials and natural fiber on mechanical performance of concrete. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2020, 45: 8577-8589.

[58]

Xu Q, Ji T, Gao S, Yang Z, Wu N. Characteristics and applications of sugar cane bagasse ash waste in cementitious materials. Materials. 2018, 12: 39.

[59]

Loh YR, Sujan D, Rahman ME, Das CA. Sugarcane bagasse—The future composite material: A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2013, 7514-22.

[60]

Königsberger M, Hlobil M, Delsaute B, Staquet S, Hellmich C, Pichler B. Hydrate failure in ITZ governs concrete strength: A micro-to-macro validated engineering mechanics model. Cement and Concrete Research. 2018, 103: 77-94.

[61]

Liu H, Wang CLY, Bai G, Wu Y, He C, Zhang R. Influence of pore defects on the hardened properties of 3D printed concrete with coarse aggregate. Additive Manufacturing. 2022, 55. 102843

[62]

Zhang K, Lin W, Zhang Q, Wang D, Luo S. Evaluation of anisotropy and statistical parameters of compressive strength for 3D printed concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2024, 440. 137417

[63]

Wu P, Dai K, Shi Y, Rong H, Zhang X. Effect of biomass ash on hydration, properties and microstructure of ultra-high performance concrete. Journal of Building Engineering. 2025, 104. 112276

[64]

Carbon Emissions data by Electricity production, Electricity Maps. https://www.electricitymaps.com/

[65]

Nikravan M, Firdous R, Stephan D. Life cycle assessment of alkali-activated materials: A systematic literature review. Low-Carbon Materials and Green Construction. 2023.

[66]

Shi Y, Long G, Ma C, Xie Y, He J. Design and preparation of ultra-high performance concrete with low environmental impact. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019, 214: 633-643.

[67]

Shi Y, Long G, Zen X, Xie Y, Shang T. Design of binder system of eco-efficient UHPC based on physical packing and chemical effect optimization. Construction and Building Materials. 2021, 274. 121382

Funding

Shanghai Rising-Star Program(22QB1405000)

Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality(23DZ1202906)

Tongji University

Higher Education Commision, Pakistan(NRPU-16539)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/