A pragmatic view on referential acts in aphasia

Roberto Graci , Alessandro Capone

Language and Health ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 100050

PDF (537KB)
Language and Health ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) :100050 DOI: 10.1016/j.laheal.2025.100050
Research article
research-article
A pragmatic view on referential acts in aphasia
Author information +
History +
PDF (537KB)

Abstract

This paper investigates referential acts in discourse, focusing on how individuals with aphasia use language within specific communicative contexts. We argue that reference is not merely a function of lexical or syntactic conventions, but a pragmatic act shaped by context, shared knowledge, and interactional dynamics. Through discourse analyses, we show that people with aphasia often maintain referential coherence when supported by collaborative interlocutors. In contrast to traditional assessments that rely on decontextualized testing, we advocate for assessment approaches grounded in the analysis of real communicative situations, which better capture the situated and collaboratively constructed nature of reference. By integrating contextual, perceptual, and social dimensions into assessment and intervention, we propose a shift toward more dynamic and effective models for understanding and supporting communicative abilities in aphasia.

Keywords

Aphasia / Reference / Discourse / Referential act / Referential coherence / Pragmeme

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Roberto Graci, Alessandro Capone. A pragmatic view on referential acts in aphasia. Language and Health, 2025, 3(1): 100050 DOI:10.1016/j.laheal.2025.100050

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Capone Alessandro: Writing - review & editing, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Conceptualization. Graci Roberto: Writing - review & editing, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

[1]

Allan K. (2010). Referring as a pragmatic act. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11), 2919-2931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.017

[2]

Allan, K. (2013). What is common ground? In A. Capone, F. Lo Piparo, & M. Carapezza (Eds.), Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics (pp.285-310). Springer.

[3]

Bauman R., & Sherzer J. (1974). Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. CUP.

[4]

Beeke S., Beckley F., Best W., Johnson F., Edwards S., & Maxim J. (2013). Extended turn construction and test question sequences in the conversations of three speakers with agrammatic aphasia. Clinical Linguistics Phonetics, 27, 784-804. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2013.808267

[5]

Bloch S., & Beeke S. (2008). Co-constructed talk in the conversations of people with dysarthria and aphasia. Clinical Linguistics Phonetics, 22(12), 974-990. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200802394831

[6]

Capone A. (2005). Pragmemes (a study with reference to English and Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1355-1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.013

[7]

Capone A. (2019). Pragmatics and Philosophy. Connections and Ramifications. Springer.

[8]

Capone A., & Graci R. (2024). Pragmemes revisited. A theoretical framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.132929

[9]

Cummings L. (2005). Pragmatics: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Lawrence Elbaum Associates.

[10]

Cummings L. (2009). Clinical Pragmatics. CUP.

[11]

Cummings L. (2017). Research in Clinical Pragmatics. Springer.

[12]

Cummings L. (2021). Language Case Files in Neurological Disorders. Routledge.

[13]

Cummings, L. (2023). The Role of Context in Clinical Linguistics. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Language in Context. Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics (pp.393-416). CUP.

[14]

Dawson D. R., & Marcotte T. D. (2017). Special issue on ecological validity and cognitive assessment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 27(5), 599-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2017.1313379

[15]

Enderby P., Wood V., & Wade D. (2013). Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test (3rd ed). Stass Publications.

[16]

Evans G. (1982). The Varieties of Reference. OUP.

[17]

García-Carpintero M. (2018). The Mill-Frege theory of proper names. Mind, 127, 1107-1168. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzx010

[18]

Goodglass H., Kaplan E., & Barresi B. (2001). Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination ( 3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

[19]

Goodwin C. (1986). Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Text, 6, 283-316. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1986.6.3.283

[20]

Goodwin C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 233-260. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_4

[21]

Goodwin C. (2000). Gesture, aphasia and interaction. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp.84-98). CUP.

[22]

Goodwin, C. (2003). Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning in aphasia. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp.90-116). OUP.

[23]

Graci R. (2023a). Aphasia’s implication for linguistics research. Springer.

[24]

Graci R. (2023b). Towards an extended notion of Common Ground in aphasiology. Intercultural Pragmatics, 20(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-0002

[25]

Heeschen C., & Schegloff E. A. (1999). Agrammatism, adaptation theory, conversation analysis: On the role of so-called telegraphic style in talk-in-interaction. Aphasiology, 13(4-5), 365-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399402145

[26]

Heritage, J. C. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In M. J, Atkinson, & J. C. Heritage ( Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp.299-345). CUP.

[27]

Hux K., Buechter M., Wallace S., & Weissling S. E. K. (2010). Using visual scene displays to create a shared communication space for a person with aphasia. Aphasiology, 24(5), 643-660. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902869299

[28]

Jaszczolt M. K. (2005). Default Semantics: foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. OUP.

[29]

Kaplan E., Goodglass H., & Weintraub S. (1983). The Boston Naming Test ( 2nd ed.). Lea & Febiger.

[30]

Kecskes I. (2013). Intercultural Pragmatics. UOP.

[31]

Kecskes I. (2019). The interplay of prior experience and actual situational context in intercultural first encounters. Pragmatics Cognition, 26(1), 112-134. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19008.kec

[32]

Kertesz A. (2006). Western Aphasia Battery (Revised ed.). TX: Pearson Assessment.

[33]

Laakso M. (2015). Collaborative participation in aphasic word searching: Comparison between significant others and speech and language therapists. Aphasiology, 29(3), 269-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2013.878450

[34]

Lindsay J., & Wilkinson R. (1999). Repair sequences in aphasic talk: A comparison of aphasic-speech and language therapist and aphasic-spouse conversations. Aphasiology, 13, 305-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399402118

[35]

MacWhinney B., Fromm D., Forbes M., & Holland A. (2011). AphasiaBank: Methods for studying discourse. Aphasiology, 25, 1286-1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.589893.Databasereference:AndreettaS.https://doi.org/10.21415/T5P882.

[36]

Mey J. L. (2001). Pragmatics. An introduction. Blackwell.

[37]

Mey J. L. (2010). Reference and the pragmeme. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(11), 2882-2888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.009

[38]

Nakase-Thompson R., Manning E. Sherer, Yablon M., Gontkovsky S, S., & Vickery C. (2005). Brief assessment of severe language impairments: Initial validation of the Mississippi aphasia screening test. Brain Injury, 19(9), 685-691. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050400025331

[39]

Oelschlaeger M. L., & Damico J. S. (2000). Partnership in conversation: A study of word search strategies. Journal of Communication Disorders, 33, 205-225. doi: 10.1016/ s0021- 9924(00)00019-8. PMID: 10907716.

[40]

Olness G. S., Matteson S. E., & Stewart C. T. (2010). “Let me tell you the point”: How speakers with aphasia assign prominence to information in narratives. Aphasiology, 24(6-8), 697-708. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030903438524

[41]

Olness G. S., & Ulatowska H. K. (2011). Personal narratives in aphasia: Coherence in the context of use. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1393-1413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.599365

[42]

Olness G. S., Gyger J., & Thomas K. (2012). Analysis of narrative functionality: Toward evidence-based approaches in managed care settings. Seminars in Speech and Language, 33(1), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1301163

[43]

Olness G., & Ulatowska K. H. (2017). Aphasias. In L. Cummings (Ed.), Research in clinical pragmatics (pp.211-242). Springer.

[44]

Perkins L., Whitworth A., & Lesser R. (1997). Conversation Analysis Profile for People with Cognitive Impairments (CAPPCI). Whurr.

[45]

Polanyi L. (1989). Telling the American story: A structural and cultural analysis of conversational storytelling. The MIT Press.

[46]

Rayner H., & Marshall J. (2003). Training volunteers as conversation partners for people with aphasia. International journal of language & communication disorders, 38 (2), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/1368282021000060308

[47]

Riccardi A., Fabbro F., & Obler L. K. (2004). Pragmatically appropriate code-switching in a quadrilingual with Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 91(1), 54-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.030

[48]

Schegloff A. E. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075-1095. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030

[49]

Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. C. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp.28-52). CUP.

[50]

Schegloff E. A. (1988). Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90019-7

[51]

Searle J. (1983). Intentionality: an Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. CUP.

[52]

Sekine K., & Rose L. M. (2013). The relationship of aphasia type and gesture production in people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22, 662-672. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0030)

[53]

Sullivan, A. (2006). Causal Theories of Reference and Meaning. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics ( 2nd ed., pp. 235-238). Elsevier.

[54]

Ulatowska H. K., Olness G. S., Hill C. L., Roberts J., & Keebler M. W. (2000). Repetition in narratives of African Americans: The effects of aphasia. Discourse Processes, 30(3), 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp3003_3

[55]

Ulmer E., Hux K., Brown J., Nelms T., & Reeder C. (2017). Using self-captured photographs to support the expressive communication of people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 31(10), 1183-1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1274872

[56]

Wilkinson R. (1999). Sequentiality as a problem and resource for intersubjectivity in aphasic conversation: Analysis and implications for therapy. Aphasiology, 13(4-5), 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039940212

PDF (537KB)

24

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/