Public and patient involvement in research to support genome services development in the UK

Abstract

Public and patient involvement (PPI) - the collaboration in research with members of the public and patients with relevant experience - is becoming well established in health service research in the UK. It is supported by funders and academic institutions. Published principles and guidelines for researchers, developed through consultation and consensus building, are available. Meanwhile, as genome sequencing is adopted into routine health care, translational genomics research and research to evaluate new genomic services are growing. Given the ethical and social implications of offering genome sequencing within a national health service, it is important that researchers give full consideration to planning and implementing meaningful PPI. Here we present five case studies of PPI in a variety of clinical genomic studies, including commentary on positive impacts and suggestions for improvements. We call for funders and academic institutions to continue and increase their efforts to enable and promote PPI across genomic and other health service research.

Keywords

PPI / patient involvement / genome sequencing / health service research

References

[1] NIHR open research. Available from: https://openresearch.nihr.ac.uk/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[2] NIHR. What is patient and public involvement and public engagement? Available from: https://www.spcr.nihr.ac.uk/PPI/what-is-patient-and-public-involvement-and-engagement [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[3] ShippeeND,PrutskyLopez GJ.Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework.Health Expect2015;18:1151-66 PMCID:PMC5060820

[4] HoekstraF,KhanM.A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.Health Res Policy Syst2020;18:51 PMCID:PMC7249434

[5] GreenhalghT,FinlayT.Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: systematic review and co-design pilot.Health Expect2019;22:785-801 PMCID:PMC6737756

[6] BainesRL.Optimizing patient and public involvement (PPI): identifying its “essential” and “desirable” principles using a systematic review and modified Delphi methodology.Health Expect2018;21:327-35 PMCID:PMC5750770

[7] StaniszewskaS,SimeraI.GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.BMJ2017;358:j3453

[8] KnowlesSE,FlynnJ,BoadenR.Contributors are representative, as long as they agree: how confirmation logic overrides effort to achieve synthesis in applied health research.Health Expect2022;25:2405-15 PMCID:PMC9615063

[9] HanleyB,RatcliffeN,YuR. Workshop report. Patient and public involvement in laboratory based research: reflections on six studies. Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Vejrg9Oa3dURUrI4fHydQSsZGSdmBNG2/view [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[10] CrockerJC,ParkerA.Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ2018;363:k4738 PMCID:PMC6259046

[11] BrettJ,MockfordC.A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.Patient2014;7:387-95

[12] StaleyK.“Is it worth doing?.Res Involv Engagem2015;1:6 PMCID:PMC5598089

[13] RussellJ,GreenhalghT.The impact of public involvement in health research: what are we measuring?.Res Involv Engagem2020;6:63 PMCID:PMC7592364

[14] NHS Health Research Authority public involvement web resource. Available from: https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/best-practice/public-involvement/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[15] National Institute for Health and Care Research public involvement web resource. UK standards for public involvement. Available from: https://sites.google.com/nihr.ac.uk/pi-standards/home [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[16] Parkinson’s disease UK public involvement web resources. patient and public involvement in research. Available from: https://www.parkinsons.org.uk/research/patient-and-public-involvement-research [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[17] BrettJ,SimeraI.Reaching consensus on reporting patient and public involvement (PPI) in research: methods and lessons learned from the development of reporting guidelines.BMJ Open2017;7:e016948 PMCID:PMC5665282

[18] National Institute for Health and Care Research public involvement opportunities web resource. Opportunities for public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Available from: https://www.peopleinresearch.org/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[19] National Institute for Health and Care Research INVOLVE directory. Charity Involvement Directory. Available from: https://www.invo.org.uk/charity-involvement-directory/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[20] National Institute for Health and Care Research web guide for applicants. A brief guide to public involvement in funding applications. Available from: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/a-brief-guide-to-public-involvement-in-funding-applications/24162 [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[21] Great Ormond Street Hospital Charity grant funding web resource. GOSH charity and sparks national funding call 2022/23 FAQs. Available form: https://www.gosh.org/what-we-do/grant-funding/apply-grant-funding/joint-national-funding-call-supporting-information/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[22] Wellcome grant funding web resource. Research involving human participants policy. Available from: https://wellcome.org/grant-funding/guidance/research-involving-human-participants-policy [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[23] UK Research and Innovation, Medical Research Council applicant guidance. Guidance for Applicants 2022. Available from: https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/MRC-15082022-Guidance-for-Applicants-22.3-FINAL.pdf [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[24] UK Research and Innovation, Economic and Social Research Council applicant guidance. ESRC Research Funding Guide August 2022. Available from: https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/ESRC-150822-ResearchFundingGuide.pdf [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[25] TanVY.The UK BioBank: a shining example of genome-wide association study science with the power to detect the murky complications of real-world epidemiology.Ann Rev Genom Genet569-589

[26] TurnbullC,ThomasE.The 100,000 genomes project: bringing whole genome sequencing to the NHS.BMJ2018;361:k1687

[27] NIHR BioResource website. Rare Diseases BioResource. Available from: https://bioresource.nihr.ac.uk/rare-diseases/rare-diseases/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[28] BiobankUK publication list. Available from: https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/publications [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[29] National Institute for Health and Care Research, BioResource publications list. Available from: https://bioresource.nihr.ac.uk/publications/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[30] Genomics England publications list. Available from: https://www.genomicsengland.co.uk/research/publications?ged=1 [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[31] NHS service guidance. Rapid exome sequencing service guidance: fetal anomalies testing. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/B0179_Guidance-rapid-exome-sequencing-service-for-fetal-anomalies_July21.pdf [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[32] StarkZ.Rapid genomic testing for critically ill children: time to become standard of care?.Eur J Hum Genet2022;30:142-9 PMCID:PMC8821543

[33] Genomics England newborn genomes web resource. Newborn Genomes Programme. Available from: https://www.genomicsengland.co.uk/initiatives/newborns [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[34] MurtaghMJ,GaffCL.Engaged genomic science produces better and fairer outcomes: an engagement framework for engaging and involving participants, patients and publics in genomics research and healthcare implementation.Wellcome Open Res2021;6:311 PMCID:PMC9086526

[35] BurkeK.The challenge of consent in clinical genome-wide testing.Arch Dis Child2016;101:1048-52

[36] SharifSM,AhmedM.Enhancing inclusion of diverse populations in genomics: A competence framework.J Genet Couns2020;29:282-92

[37] FatumoS,ChoudhuryA,MartinAR.A roadmap to increase diversity in genomic studies.Nat Med2022;28:243-50

[38] LewisC,ClarkeA.Mixed-methods evaluation of the NHS Genomic Medicine Service for paediatric rare diseases: study protocol [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations].NIHR Open Res2022;1:23

[39] Genetic Alliance UK. Available from: https://geneticalliance.org.uk/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[40] Unique. Available from: https://rarechromo.org/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[41] SWANUK. Available form: https://www.undiagnosed.org.uk/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[42] Video summary explaining our research. Available from: https://vimeo.com/718758712 [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[43] Alstrom Syndrome UK. Available from: https://www.alstrom.org.uk/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[44] HillM,FisherJ.Optimising exome prenatal sequencing services (EXPRESS): a study protocol to evaluate rapid prenatal exome sequencing in the NHS Genomic Medicine Service [version 2; peer review: 2 approved].NIHR Open Res2022;2:10 PMCID:PMC7613246

[45] Antenatal Results and Choices (ARC) website. Available from: https://www.arc-uk.org/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[46] HastingsWard J,McCormickD.Research participants: critical friends, agents for change.Eur J Hum Genet2022;30:1309-13 PMCID:PMC9712391

[47] Involve. Available from: https://involve.org.uk/ [Last accessed on 3 Feb 2023]

[48] OrmondroydE,ThomsonKL.Secondary findings in inherited heart conditions: a genotype-first feasibility study to assess phenotype, behavioural and psychosocial outcomes.Eur J Hum Genet2020;28:1486-96 PMCID:PMC7576165

[49] GreenRC,GrodyWW.ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.Genet Med2013;15:565-74

[50] BeskowLM,NameyEE,DavisAM.Recommendations for ethical approaches to genotype-driven research recruitment.Hum Genet2012;131:1423-31 PMCID:PMC3686635

[51] DonabedianA.Evaluating the quality of medical care.Milbank Q2005;83:691-729 PMCID:PMC2690293

[52] OclooJ,FranklinBD.Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a systematic review of reviews.Health Res Policy Syst2021;19:8 PMCID:PMC7816359