Corrosion Behaviors of Disinfectants on Dental Unit Waterlines

Abstract

To investigate the corrosion behaviors and antibacterial effects of sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) and hydrogen peroxide silver ion (HPSI) disinfectants with different concentrations against dental unit waterlines and provide guidance and reference for the use of chemical disinfectants, polyurethane tubes were immersed in ultrapure water (control group), 0.1% NaClO, 0.5% NaClO, 1.0% NaClO, 2.5% HPSI, 5.0% HPSI, and 10% HPSI solutions for 6, 12, and 18 weeks. Contact angles and Fourier transform infrared spectra were detected. Surface morphologies were observed using scanning electron microscopy and antibacterial activity was evaluated using Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). The results showed that sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide silver ion disinfectants presented good antibacterial activity against S. aureus. However, sodium hypochlorite could cause serious damage to the water pipes where corrosion pits and cracks were observed, and increasing the concentration of sodium hypochlorite could accelerate the corrosion process. Hydrogen peroxide silver ion disinfectants had no obvious damage to the water pipes. Therefore, hydrogen peroxide silver ion disinfectants are recommended to use for controlling bacterial infection in dental unit waterlines which can reduce the damage to the water pipes.

Keywords

disinfectant / dental unit waterlines / sodium hypochlorite / hydrogen peroxide silver ion

References

[1] Son K, Son YT, Jin MU, et al. Satisfaction Factors with a Dental Unit Chair System in South Korea: A Dentist’s Perspective[J]. Healthcare, 2022, 10: 437.

[2] Coleman DC, O’Donnell MJ, Shore AC, et al. Biofilm Problems in Dental Unit Water Systems and Its Practical Control[J]. J. Appl. Microbiol., 2009, 106: 1 424-1 437.

[3] Coleman DC, O’Donnell MJ, Shore AC, et al. The Role of Manufacturers in Reducing Biofilms in Dental Chair Waterlines[J]. J. Dent., 2007, 35: 701-711.

[4] Fan C, Gu H, Liu L, et al. Distinct Microbial Community of Accumulated Biofilm in Dental Unit Waterlines of Different Specialties[J]. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 2021, 11: 670 211.

[5] Francolini I, Donelli G. Prevention and Control of Biofilm-based Medical-device-related Infections[J]. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol., 2010, 59: 227-238.

[6] Walker RJ, Burke FJT, Miller CH, et al. An Investigation of the Microbial Contamination of Dental Unit Air and Water Lines[J]. Int. Dent. J., 2004, 54: 438-444.

[7] Yoon HY, Lee SY. Susceptibility of Bacteria Isolated from Dental Unit Waterlines to Disinfecting Chemical Agents[J]. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol., 2018, 64: 269-275.

[8] Dallolio L, Scuderi A, Rini M, et al. Effect of Different Disinfection Protocols on Microbial and Biofilm Contamination of Dental Unit Waterlines in Community Dental Practices[J]. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heath, 2014, 11: 2 064-2 076.

[9] Zhang H, Qiu J, Yan B, et al. Regulation of Ce (III)/Ce (IV) Ratio of Cerium Oxide for Antibacterial Application[J]. iScience, 2021, 24: 102 226.

[10] Zhang S, Liu C, Yang D, et al. Mechanism Insight on Drug Skin Delivery from Polyurethane Hydrogels: Roles of Molecular Mobility and Intermolecular Interaction[J]. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 2021, 161: 105 783.