Predicting Agility and Identifying Football Player Profiles: A Machine Learning Approach
Jahanavee Parikshit Ichchhaporia , Pradyut Anand , Mercy Mutinda , Essah M. Taylor , Rashmi Kumari , Shatrudhan Pandey
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise ›› : 1 -12.
This study examined whether static flexibility assessments predict agility performance in elite football players and investigated performance-based player profiling using machine learning.
A total of 157 elite male football players (aged 18–33 years) from 7 African nations (South Sudan, Liberia, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, Cameroon, and Nigeria) completed the Thomas Test, 90/90 Hamstring Test, and Illinois Agility Test. Given violations of normality (Shapiro–Wilk W = 0.900, P < 0.001) and variance homogeneity (Levene’s F = 1.752, P = 0.044), non-parametric tests were used as the primary analyses, with parametric procedures retained as sensitivity checks. Machine learning models (Random Forest and Gradient Boosting) were trained under stratified 70/15/15 splits with repeated 5-fold cross-validation. K-Means clustering was applied for unsupervised player profiling; a five-cluster solution was retained and validated by silhouette analysis and the Davies–Bouldin index.
No significant flexibility–agility association was observed (Mann–Whitney U = 2156, P = 0.847, r = 0.02; independent-samples t-test T = − 0.1033, P = 0.918). Random Forest (R² = 0.008, 95% CI: −0.023 to 0.039) and Gradient Boosting (R² = −0.054, 95% CI: −0.087 to − 0.021) both failed to predict agility outcomes. Test Number (56.8%), Age (23.1%), and Playing Position (11.9%) dominated model variance, while all flexibility variables combined contributed less than 10%. Unsupervised clustering identified five latent performance clusters (one a singleton treated as an outlier), while positional analysis showed faster forwards (median = 18.9 s), intermediate midfielders/defenders (median = 19.8 s), and slower goalkeepers (median = 21.1 s).
Static muscle tightness tests lack predictive validity for functional change-of-direction ability in elite football players. Future research should prioritise dynamic, sport-specific, neuromuscular, and cognitive performance measures in athlete profiling.
Sports / Agility / Muscle tightness / Football player / Machine learning
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
Beijing Sport University
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |