Portable Fixed Frame Dynamometry Shows Poor Agreement with Isokinetic Dynamometry During Isometric Knee Extension and Flexion Strength Tests

Ashley Jones , Chris Brogden , Gareth Nicholson , Joshua Martin , Josh Walker

Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise ›› : 1 -9.

PDF
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise ›› :1 -9. DOI: 10.1007/s42978-025-00357-5
Original Article
research-article

Portable Fixed Frame Dynamometry Shows Poor Agreement with Isokinetic Dynamometry During Isometric Knee Extension and Flexion Strength Tests

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the level of agreement between the KangaTech (KT360) portable fixed-frame dynamometer and the Cybex isokinetic dynamometer (IKD) in assessing maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the knee flexor and extensor muscles. Specifically, the research investigated whether the KT360 provides comparable measurements to the IKD when quantifying isometric knee muscle strength.

Methods

Twenty-three physically active participants (16 males, 7 females; age: 27±7 years) completed MVIC testing of the knee flexors and extensors using both KT360 and IKD. Testing order was randomised, and standardised protocols were followed. Peak force (KT360) and peak joint moment (IKD, converted to force) were recorded. Agreement was assessed using paired t-tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,1), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC), and Bland–Altman analysis.

Results

KT360 recorded 24% lower peak force for extensors and 17%–21% higher for flexors compared to IKD (P<0.001). ICC values ranged from poor to excellent (−0.093 to 0.964). Bland–Altman analysis revealed systematic bias: KT360 underestimated extensor strength (~27%) and overestimated flexor strength (~17%–19%), with wide limits of agreement and significant heteroscedasticity.

Conclusion

KT360 and IKD are not interchangeable for assessing isometric knee strength. While KT360 offers portability and accessibility, its results should be interpreted with caution, especially in contexts requiring precise strength quantification such as injury risk assessment and rehabilitation.

Keywords

KangaTech / Cybex / Dynamometer / Hamstrings / Quadriceps / Injury risk

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ashley Jones, Chris Brogden, Gareth Nicholson, Joshua Martin, Josh Walker. Portable Fixed Frame Dynamometry Shows Poor Agreement with Isokinetic Dynamometry During Isometric Knee Extension and Flexion Strength Tests. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise 1-9 DOI:10.1007/s42978-025-00357-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Association WM. World medical association declaration of helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 2013, 310(20): 2191-4

[2]

Behm DG, Chaouachi A. A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2011, 111(11): 2633-51

[3]

Bland JM, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1986, 327(8476): 307-10

[4]

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 1988, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum75108

[5]

Croisier J-L, Ganteaume S, Binet J, Genty M, Ferret J-M. Strength imbalances and prevention of hamstring injury in professional soccer players: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med, 2008, 36(8): 1469-75

[6]

Daneshjoo A, Rahnama N, Mokhtar AH, Yusof A. Bilateral and unilateral asymmetries of isokinetic strength and flexibility in male young professional soccer players. J Hum Kinet, 2013, 36: 45-53

[7]

Dauty M, Menu P, Fouasson-Chailloux A, Ferréol S, Dubois C. Prediction of hamstring injury in professional soccer players by isokinetic measurements. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J, 2016, 6(1 116

[8]

Dunne C, Callaway AJ, Thurston J, Williams JM. Validity, reliability, minimal detectable change, and methodological considerations for HHD and portable fixed frame isometric hip and groin strength testing: a comparison of unilateral and bilateral testing methods. Phys Ther Sport, 2022, 57: 46-52

[9]

van Dyk N, Witvrouw E, Bahr R. Interseason variability in isokinetic strength and poor correlation with Nordic hamstring eccentric strength in football players. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2018, 288): 1878-87

[10]

Gioftsidou A, Ispirlidis I, Pafis G, Malliou P, Bikos C, Godolias G. Isokinetic strength training program for muscular imbalances in professional soccer players. Sport Sci Health, 2008, 2: 101-5

[11]

Hickey JT, Opar DA, Weiss LJ, Heiderscheit BC. Hamstring strain injury rehabilitation. J Athl Train, 2022, 57(2): 125-35

[12]

Ivarsson A, Cronström A. Agreement between isokinetic dynamometer and hand-held isometric dynamometer as measures to detect lower limb asymmetry in muscle torque after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2022, 17(7): 1307

[13]

KangaTech. Knee extension protocol. 2023. https://help.kanga-tech.com/Protocols/knee-ext. Accessed 15 Jun 2025.

[14]

KangaTech. Knee flexion H45/K30. 2023. https://help.kanga-tech.com/Protocols/knee-flex-45-30. Accessed 15 Jun 2025.

[15]

Kellis E, Baltzopoulos V. The effects of the antagonist muscle force on intersegmental loading during isokinetic efforts of the knee extensors. J Biomech, 1999, 32119-25

[16]

Kelly SB, Alvar BA, Black LE, Dodd DJ, Carothers KF, Brown LE. The effect of warm-up with whole-body vibration vs. cycle ergometry on isokinetic dynamometry. J Strength Cond Res, 2010, 24(11): 3140-3

[17]

Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med, 2016, 15(2): 155-63

[18]

May LA, Burnham RS, Steadward RD. Assessment of isokinetic and hand-held dynamometer measures of shoulder rotator strength among individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1997, 78(3): 251-5

[19]

Nicholson G, Walker J, Brogden C, Alt T. Concurrent repetitions overestimate hamstring:quadriceps ratios at extended knee joint positions: implications for clinical practice. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2025, 35(4 e70049

[20]

Opar DA, Piatkowski T, Williams MD, Shield AJ. A novel device using the Nordic hamstring exercise to assess eccentric knee flexor strength: a reliability and retrospective injury study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(9):636–40. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2013.4837.

[21]

Racinais S, Oksa J. Temperature and neuromuscular function. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2010, 20: 1-18

[22]

Ransom M, Saunders S, Gallo T, Segal J, Jones D, Jones M, Milanese S. Reliability of a portable fixed frame dynamometry system used to test lower limb strength in elite Australian football league players. J Sci Med Sport, 2020, 239): 826-30

[23]

Rassier DE, MacIntosh B, Herzog W. Length dependence of active force production in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol, 1999, 86(5): 1445-57

[24]

Reinking MF, Bockrath-Pugliese K, Worrell T, Kegerreis RL, Miller-Sayers K, Farr J. Assessment of quadriceps muscle performance by hand-held, isometric, and isokinetic dynamometry in patients with knee dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1996, 24(3): 154-9

[25]

Šarabon N, Kozinc Ž, Perman M. Establishing reference values for isometric knee extension and flexion strength. Front Physiol, 2021, 12 767941

[26]

Stark T, Walker B, Phillips JK, Fejer R, Beck R. Hand-held dynamometry correlation with the gold standard isokinetic dynamometry: a systematic review. PM&R, 2011, 3(5): 472-9

[27]

Thomas AC, Villwock M, Wojtys EM, Palmieri-Smith RM. Lower extremity muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. J Athl Train, 2013, 48(5): 610-20

[28]

Toonstra J, Mattacola CG. Test-retest reliability and validity of isometric knee-flexion and-extension measurement using 3 methods of assessing muscle strength. J Sport Rehabil. 2013;22(1):10.1123/jsr.2013.TR7. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2013.TR7.

[29]

Vermeulen HM, de Bock GH, van Houwelingen HC, van der Meer RL, Mol MC, Plus BTet al.. A comparison of two portable dynamometers in the assessment of shoulder and elbow strength. Physiotherapy, 2005, 91(2): 101-12

[30]

Woolhead E, Partner R, Parsley M, Jones A. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the KangaTech (KT360) fixed frame dynamometry system during maximal isometric strength measurements of the knee flexors. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2024, 19111397

Funding

Leeds Beckett University(Leeds Beckett University)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

3

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/