Reliability Challenges in 1RM Parallel Back Squat Testing: The Critical Role of Squat Depth

M. Keiner , K. Warneke , C.-M. Wagner , L. H. Lohmann , S. D. Siegel , T. Brauner

Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise ›› : 1 -8.

PDF
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise ›› :1 -8. DOI: 10.1007/s42978-025-00346-8
Original Article
research-article

Reliability Challenges in 1RM Parallel Back Squat Testing: The Critical Role of Squat Depth

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Purpose

This study analyzed the inter-session reliability of the parallel back squat during one-repetition-maximum (1RM) testing in elite youth soccer players and to exploratorily evaluate the consistency with which the prescribed squat depth is achieved.

Methods

The sample comprised 47 male soccer players (age: 18.1 ± 2.3 years, body mass: 72.4 ± 7.7 kg, height: 1.83 ± 0.06 m) from German youth soccer academy teams competing in top junior leagues (U16-U19). The 1RM was assessed under standardized conditions, with squat depth monitored using a hybrid marker- and silhouette-based motion capture system. The inter-session reliability of 1RM load was quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Systematic bias between sessions was evaluated using a paired-samples t-test (with Cohen’s d for effect size). Within-session deviations from the 90° squat-depth target were assessed using a one-sample t-test (with Cohen’s d for effect size).

Results

The participants achieved an absolute 1RM of 94.9 ± 13.7 kg (relative: 1.32 ± 0.19). The 1RM test–retest (inter-session) reliability regarding load lifted yielded an ICC of 0.970 (95% CI: 0.948–0.982), with a mean bias of 1.71 kg (P = 0.018, d = 0.39). An explanatory analysis of the kinetic data from each participant’s best trial (within-session) showed that squat depth deviations (thigh angle 89.7° ± 4.1°) did not differ significantly from the target depth of 90° (P = 0.630, d = 0.15), where 0° corresponds to full knee extension.

Conclusions

This study’s parallel back-squat 1RM testing protocol in national-level male youth soccer players demonstrated excellent load reliability. Squat depth may confound reliability, and its full impact on inter-session error warrants further study; nonetheless, familiarization, skilled spotters, and practiced participants can help limit its effect.

Keywords

Test–retest / Motion capture / Thigh angle / Technique / Performance testing / Performance variability / Strength training / Soccer

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
M. Keiner, K. Warneke, C.-M. Wagner, L. H. Lohmann, S. D. Siegel, T. Brauner. Reliability Challenges in 1RM Parallel Back Squat Testing: The Critical Role of Squat Depth. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise 1-8 DOI:10.1007/s42978-025-00346-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med, 1998, 26: 217-238

[2]

Augustsson RS, Svantesson U. Reliability of the 1 rm bench press and squat in young women. Eur J Physiother, 2013, 15: 118-126

[3]

Case MJ, Knudson DV, Downey DL. Barbell squat relative strength as an identifier for lower extremity injury in collegiate athletes. J Strength Cond Res, 2020, 34: 1249-1253

[4]

Chiari L, Croce UD, Leardini A, Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry: Part 2: instrumental errors. Gait Posture, 2005, 21: 197-211

[5]

Comfort P, McMahon J. Reliability of maximal back squat and power clean performances in inexperienced athletes. J Strength Cond Res, 2015, 29: 3089-3096

[6]

Coratella G, Tornatore G, Caccavale F, Longo S, Esposito F, Ce E. The activation of gluteal, thigh, and lower back muscles in different squat variations performed by competitive bodybuilders: implications for resistance training. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021

[7]

Grgic J, Lazinica B, Schoenfeld BJ, Pedisic Z. Test-retest reliability of the one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength assessment: a systematic review. Sports Medine Open, 2020, 6: 31

[8]

Haff GG, Triplett NT. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. 4th ed. Champagne, IL: Human Kinetics; 2016.

[9]

Hartmann H, Wirth K, Klusemann M, Dalic J, Matuschek C, Schmidtbleicher D. Influence of squatting depth on jumping performance. J Strength Cond Res, 2012, 26: 3243-3261

[10]

Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med, 2000, 30: 1-15

[11]

James LP, Weakley J, Comfort P, Huynh M. The relationship between isometric and dynamic strength following resistance training: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and level of agreement. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 2024, 19: 2-12

[12]

Keiner M, Brauner T, Kadlubowski B, Sander A, Wirth K. The influence of maximum squatting strength on jump and sprint performance: a cross-sectional analysis of 492 youth soccer players. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19 5835

[13]

Keiner M, Sander A, Wirth K, Hartmann H, Yaghobi D. Correlations between maximal strength tests at different squat depths and sprint performance in adolescent soccer players. Am J Sports Sci, 2014, 2: 1-7

[14]

Keiner M, Warneke K, Sander A, et al.. Do small samples bias the correlation between strength and jump performance? Multivariate insights into age and sex amidst strength saturation: An analysis of 1,544 participants from different sports. Biol Sport, 2024, 30(42): 3-11

[15]

Kim S, Kim H. A new metric of absolute percentage error for intermittent demand forecasts. Int J Forecast, 2016, 32: 669-679

[16]

Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med, 2016, 15: 155-163

[17]

Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA, Fry AC, French D, Maud PJ, Foster CC. Strength training: development and evaluation of methodology. Boston: ScienceOpen, Inc; 1995.

[18]

Lohmann LH, Hillebrecht M, Schiemann S, Warneke K. Stressing the relevance of differentiating between systematic and random measurement errors in ultrasound muscle thickness diagnostics. Sports Med Open, 2024, 10: 89

[19]

Lorenz DS, Reiman MP, Lehecka BJ, Naylor A. What performance characteristics determine elite versus nonelite athletes in the same sport?. Sports Health, 2013, 5: 542-547

[20]

McKay AKA, Stellingwerff T, Smith ES, et al.. Defining training and performance caliber: a participant classification framework. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 2022, 17: 317-331

[21]

Pearcey GEP, Alizedah S, Power KE, Button DC. Chronic resistance training: is it time to rethink the time course of neural contributions to strength gain?. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2021, 121: 2413-2422

[22]

Robles-Palazón FJ, Blázquez-Rincón D, López-Valenciano A, Comfort P, López-López JA, Ayala F. A systematic review and network meta-analysis on the effectiveness of exercise-based interventions for reducing the injury incidence in youth team-sport players. Part 1: an analysis by classical training components. Ann Med, 2024, 56 2408457

[23]

Sale DG. Neural adaptation to resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1988, 20: S135-145

[24]

Schoenfeld BJ. Squatting kinematics and kinetics and their application to exercise performance. J Strength Cond Res, 2010, 24: 3497-3506

[25]

Seamon BA, Kautz SA, Bowden MG, Velozo CA. Revisiting the concept of minimal detectable change for patient-reported outcome measures. Phys Ther, 2022

[26]

Stone MH, Hornsby G, Mizuguchi S, et al.. The use of free weight squats in sports: a narrative review-squatting movements, adaptation, and sports performance: physiological. J Strength Cond Res, 2024, 38: 1494-1508

[27]

Suchomel TJ, Nimphius S, Bellon CR, Stone MH. The importance of muscular strength: training considerations. Sports Med, 2018, 48: 765-785

[28]

Suchomel TJ, Nimphius S, Stone MH. The importance of muscular strength in athletic performance. Sports Med, 2016, 46: 1419-1449

[29]

Tighe J, McManus IC, Dewhurst NG, Chis L, Mucklow J. The standard error of measurement is a more appropriate measure of quality for postgraduate medical assessments than is reliability: an analysis of MRCP(UK) examinations. BMC Med Educ, 2010, 10: 40

[30]

Wagner C-M, Warneke K, Bächer C, et al.. Despite good correlations, there is no exact coincidence between isometric and dynamic strength measurements in elite youth soccer players. Sports, 2022

[31]

Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med, 1998, 17: 101-110

[32]

Warneke K, Skratek J, Wagner C-M, Wirth K, Keiner M. Random measurement and prediction errors limit the practical relevance of two velocity sensors to estimate the 1RM back squat. Front Physiol, 2024, 15: 1435103

[33]

Willmott CJ, Matsuura K. Advantages of the mean absolute error (mae) over the root mean square error (rmse) in assessing average model performance. Clim Res, 2005, 30: 79-82

[34]

Willmott CJ, Matsuura K. On the use of dimensioned measures of error to evaluate the performance of spatial interpolators. Int J Geogr Inf Sci, 2006, 20: 89-102

[35]

Wirth K, Keiner M, Fuhrmann S, Nimmerichter A, Haff GG. Strength training in swimming. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022

Funding

Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena (1010)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

17

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/