Plyometrics Evokes Non-Localized Post-Activation Performance Enhancement During the Bench Press in Experienced, Recreational Male Lifters

Nicholas J. Spokely , Jason D. Wagganer , Charlotte A. Cervantes , Monica L. Kearney

Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise ›› : 1 -10.

PDF
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise ›› :1 -10. DOI: 10.1007/s42978-025-00337-9
Original Article
research-article

Plyometrics Evokes Non-Localized Post-Activation Performance Enhancement During the Bench Press in Experienced, Recreational Male Lifters

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated whether lower-body plyometric exercise elicits non-local post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE), and if relationships exist between non-local PAPE and absolute strength, relative strength, or training age. We hypothesized that lower-body plyometrics would evoke non-local PAPE, and relationships would exist between the magnitude of non-local PAPE and absolute strength, relative strength, and training age.

Methods

Experienced, male recreational lifters (n = 19, age = 22.74 ± 2.22 years, training age = 5.08 ± 2.88 years, none competed in organized or collegiate sports) completed a randomized, crossover study. Pre- and post-tests consisted of a 70% 1-repetition maximum bench press, while peak velocity and peak power output were measured via accelerometry to assess non-local PAPE. Participants were randomized to first complete either two sets of six depth jumps (DJ) or five minutes of standing control (SC); all participants completed both conditions. Statistical analyses comprised post-activation performance enhancement in two-way repeated measure Analyses of Variance, paired sample t-tests, and bivariate correlations; all α < 0.05.

Results

There were significant interactions for peak velocity and peak power output, with significant differences between the DJ pre- and post-tests for peak velocity (pre: 0.66 ± 0.03 m/s vs. post: 0.69 ± 0.03 m/s) and peak power output (pre: 546.93 ± 34.04 W vs. post: 583.03 ± 35.04 W). No relationships existed between non-local PAPE responses and absolute strength, relative strength, or training age.

Conclusion

Our results suggest DJ can elicit non-local PAPE and augment upper-body strength-based performance in experienced, recreational male lifters.

Keywords

Depth jumps / Post-activation performance enhancement / Lower-body / Power / Strength

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Nicholas J. Spokely, Jason D. Wagganer, Charlotte A. Cervantes, Monica L. Kearney. Plyometrics Evokes Non-Localized Post-Activation Performance Enhancement During the Bench Press in Experienced, Recreational Male Lifters. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise 1-10 DOI:10.1007/s42978-025-00337-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

BaudryS, DuchateauJ. Postactivation potentiation in a human muscle: effect on the load-velocity relation of tetanic and voluntary shortening contractions. J Appl Physiol, 2007, 103(4): 1318-1325.

[2]

BlazevichAJ, BabaultN. Post-activation potentiation versus post-activation performance enhancement in humans: historical perspective, underlying mechanisms, and current issues. Front Physiol, 2019, 101359.

[3]

BullockN, ComfortP. An investigation into the acute effects of depth jumps on maximal strength performance. J Strength Cond Res, 2011, 25(11): 3137-3141.

[4]

Cuenca-FernándezF, SmithIC, JordanMJ, et al.. Nonlocalized postactivation performance enhancement (PAPE) effects in trained athletes: a pilot study. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2017, 42(10): 1122-1125.

[5]

FritschiR, SeilerJ, GrossM. Validity and effects of placement of velocity-based training devices. Sports, 2021, 99123.

[6]

HaffGG, TriplettNTEssentials of strength training and conditioning, 20154Champaign. Human Kinetics.

[7]

HamadaT, SaleDG, MacDougallJD, TarnopolskyMA. Postactivation potentiation, fiber type, and twitch contraction time in human knee extensor muscles. J Appl Physiol, 2000, 8862131.

[8]

HamiltonAR, BehmDG. The effect of prior knowledge of test endpoint on non-local muscle fatigue. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2017, 117(4): 651-663.

[9]

HeldS, RappeltL, DeutschJP, DonathL. Valid and reliable barbell velocity estimation using an inertial measurement unit. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18179170.

[10]

JohnsonM, BaudinP, LeyAL, CollinsDF. A warm-up routine that incorporates a plyometric protocol potentiates the force-generating capacity of the quadriceps muscles. J Strength Cond Res, 2019, 33(2): 380-389.

[11]

KilduffLP, BevanHR, KingsleyMI, et al.. Postactivation potentiation in professional rugby players: optimal recovery. J Strength Cond Res, 2007, 21(4): 1134-1138

[12]

KrzysztofikM, WilkM, StastnyP, GolasA. Post-activation performance enhancement in the bench press throw: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol, 2021, 11598628.

[13]

KrzysztofikM, WilkM, LockieRG, et al.. Postactivation performance enhancement of concentric bench press throw after eccentric-only conditioning exercise. J Strength Cond Res, 2020, 36(8): 2077-2081.

[14]

MacIntoshBR, RobillardME, TomarasEK. Should postactivation potentiation be the goal of your warm-up?. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2012, 37(3): 546-550.

[15]

MasamotoN, LarsonR, GatesT, FaigenbaumA. Acute effects of plyometric exercise on maximum squat performance in male athletes. J Strength Cond Res, 2003, 17(1): 68-71.

[16]

MenradT, Edelmann-NusserJ. Validation of velocity measuring devices in velocity based strength training. Int J Comput Sci Sport, 2021, 20(1): 106-118.

[17]

PowerGM, ColwellE, SaeterbakkenAH, DrinkwaterEJ, BehmDG. Lack of evidence for non-local muscle fatigue and performance enhancement in young adults. J Sports Sci Med, 2021, 202339

[18]

PrieskeO, BehrensM, ChaabeneH, GranacherU, MaffiulettiNA. Time to differentiate postactivation “potentiation” from “performance enhancement” in the strength and conditioning community. Sports Med, 2020, 50(9): 1559-1565.

[19]

RahimiR. The influence of varied rest intervals after plyometric exercise on maximum squat performance. Int J Fit, 2008, 4: 45-50

[20]

RatamessNA, AlvarBA, KiblerWB, KraemerWJ, TriplettNT. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2009, 41(3): 687-708.

[21]

SeitzLB, HaffGG. Factors modulating post-activation potentiation of jump, sprint, throw, and upper-body ballistic performances: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med, 2016, 46(2): 231-240.

[22]

SeitzLB, de VillarrealES, HaffGG. The temporal profile of postactivation potentiation is related to strength level. J Strength Cond Res, 2014, 28(3): 706-715.

[23]

SwintonPA, StewartA, AgourisI, KeoghJW, LloydR. A biomechanical analysis of straight and hexagonal barbell deadlifts using submaximal loads. J Strength Cond Res, 2011, 25(7): 2000-2009.

[24]

WilcoxJ, LarsonR, BrochuKM, FaigenbaumAD. Acute explosive-force movements enhance bench-press performance in athletic men. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 2006, 1(3): 261-269.

[25]

WilkM, KrzysztofikM, DrozdM, ZajacA. Changes of power output and velocity during successive sets of the bench press with different duration of eccentric movement. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 2020, 15(2): 162-167.

[26]

WilkM, KrzysztofikM, FilipA, et al.. Does post-activation performance enhancement occur during the bench press exercise under blood flow restriction?. Int J Environ Res, 2020, 17113752.

[27]

WilsonJM, DuncanNM, MarinPJ, et al.. Meta-analysis of postactivation potentiation and power: effects of conditioning activity, volume, gender, rest periods, and training status. J Strength Cond Res, 2013, 27(3): 854-859.

[28]

WongV, YamadaY, BellZW, et al.. Postactivation performance enhancement: does conditioning one arm augment performance in the other?. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging, 2020, 40(6): 407-414.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Beijing Sport University

PDF

172

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/