Force Loss Following Static Stretching is Mediated by Peripheral Mechanisms Dependent on the Stretching Volume: A Crossover Study

José Carlos dos Santos Albarello , Hélio V. Cabral , Marco Carbonaro , Martina Schembri , Marco Alessandria , Gabriel S. Trajano , Taian Vieira

Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise ›› : 1 -14.

PDF
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise ›› :1 -14. DOI: 10.1007/s42978-025-00336-w
Original Article
research-article

Force Loss Following Static Stretching is Mediated by Peripheral Mechanisms Dependent on the Stretching Volume: A Crossover Study

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Background

Static stretching is widely adopted in sports and exercise to enhance joint range of motion. Despite its benefits, the transient negative impact of prolonged static stretching on muscle performance is well-documented. However, the specific central and peripheral mechanisms driving these effects, especially in relation to the volume of stretching performed, are not fully understood. This study investigated the effects of different stretching volumes on plantar flexion torque, exploring the underlying central and peripheral mechanisms.

Methods

Twelve healthy subjects underwent low-volume (three sets of 30 s) and high-volume (three sets of 60 s) static stretching protocols to assess their effects on isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Peripheral mechanisms were assessed using descriptors of the torque twitch, whereas central mechanisms were evaluated from interpolated twitches and surface electromyograms detected across the gastrocnemius medialis.

Results

High-volume stretching, but not low-volume, resulted in significant decreases in MVC indicating a dose-dependent response to stretching volume. Additionally, peripheral mechanisms were primarily correlated with force loss following the high-volume stretching protocol, but not the low-volume protocol.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest a dose-dependent response of static stretching on force loss, predominantly mediated by peripheral mechanisms. These results highlight the importance of considering stretching volume prior to strength tasks while minimizing subsequent negative impacts on muscle performance. Practical recommendations include low-to-moderate static stretching volumes in activities demanding greater strength and incorporating sufficient recovery periods after high-volume stretching to mitigate transient performance declines.

Keywords

Muscle performance / Stretching / Force reduction / Neural mechanisms / Muscle mechanics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
José Carlos dos Santos Albarello, Hélio V. Cabral, Marco Carbonaro, Martina Schembri, Marco Alessandria, Gabriel S. Trajano, Taian Vieira. Force Loss Following Static Stretching is Mediated by Peripheral Mechanisms Dependent on the Stretching Volume: A Crossover Study. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise 1-14 DOI:10.1007/s42978-025-00336-w

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

AagaardP, SimonsenEB, AndersenJL, MagnussonP, Dyhre-PoulsenP. Neural adaptation to resistance training: changes in evoked V-wave and H-reflex responses. J Appl Physiol, 2002, 92: 2309-18.

[2]

Anjos FV, Pinto TP, Gazzoni M, Vieira TM. The spatial distribution of ankle muscles activity discriminates aged from young subjects during standing. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00190

[3]

AvanciniC, de OliveiraLF, MenegaldoLL, VieiraTM. Variations in the spatial distribution of the amplitude of surface electromyograms are unlikely explained by changes in the length of medial gastrocnemius fibres with knee joint angle. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10e0126888.

[4]

BehmDG, BlazevichAJ, KayAD, McHughM. Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic review. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2016, 41: 1-11.

[5]

BehmDG, KayAD, TrajanoGS, BlazevichAJ. Mechanisms underlying performance impairments following prolonged static stretching without a comprehensive warm-up. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2021, 121: 67-94.

[6]

BehmDG, St-PierreDMM, PerezD. Muscle inactivation: assessment of interpolated twitch technique. J Appl Physiol, 1996, 81: 2267-73.

[7]

BertolacciniAL, da SilvaAA, TeixeiraEL, SchoenfeldBJ, de Salles PainelliV. Does the expectancy on the static stretching effect interfere with Strength-Endurance performance??. J Strength Cond Res, 2021, 35: 2439-43.

[8]

ButtonDC, BehmDG. The effect of stimulus anticipation on the interpolated twitch technique. J Sports Sci Med, 2008, 7: 520-4

[9]

E, ParacchinoE, EspositoF. Electrical and mechanical response of skeletal muscle to electrical stimulation after acute passive stretching in humans: a combined electromyographic and mechanomyographic approach. J Sports Sci, 2008, 26: 1567-77.

[10]

Chaabene H, Behm DG, Negra Y, Granacher U. Acute effects of static stretching on muscle strength and power: an attempt to clarify previous caveats. Front Physiol. 2019;10:1468. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01468

[11]

Cicchetti DV. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic. 1981;86(2):127–37.

[12]

CostaPB, RyanED, HerdaTJ, WalterAA, HogeKM, CramerJT. Acute effects of passive stretching on the electromechanical delay and evoked twitch properties: A gender comparison. J Appl Biomech, 2012, 28: 645-54.

[13]

EspositoF, E, RampichiniS, VeicsteinasA. Acute passive stretching in a previously fatigued muscle: electrical and mechanical response during tetanic stimulation. J Sports Sci, 2009, 27: 1347-57.

[14]

FowlesJR, SaleDG, MacDougallJD. Reduced strength after passive stretch of the human plantarflexors. J Appl Physiol, 2000, 89: 1179-88.

[15]

FranzJR, SlaneLC, RasskeK, ThelenDG. Non-uniform in vivo deformations of the human Achilles tendon during walking. Gait Posture, 2015, 41: 192-7.

[16]

GallinaA, MerlettiR, VieiraTMM. Are the myoelectric manifestations of fatigue distributed regionally in the human medial gastrocnemius muscle?. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2011, 21: 929-38.

[17]

HerdaTJ, CostaPB, WalterAA, RyanED, CramerJT. The time course of the effects of constant-angle and constant‐torque stretching on the muscle–tendon unit. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2014, 24: 62-7.

[18]

Hodson-ToleEF, LoramID, VieiraTMM. Myoelectric activity along human gastrocnemius medialis: different Spatial distributions of postural and electrically elicited surface potentials. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2013, 23: 43-50.

[19]

James Steele. What is (perception of) effort? Objective and subjective effort during task performance. PsyArχiv. 2020. https://pure.solent.ac.uk/en/publications/what-is-perception-of-effort-objective-and-subjective-effort-duri.

[20]

KayAD, Blazevichaj. Effect of acute static stretch on maximal muscle performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2012, 44: 154-64.

[21]

KayAD, BlazevichAJ. Moderate-duration static stretch reduces active and passive plantar flexor moment but not Achilles tendon stiffness or active muscle length. J Appl Physiol, 2009, 106: 1249-56.

[22]

KinugasaR, KawakamiY, SinhaS, FukunagaT. Unique Spatial distribution of human muscle activation. Exp Physiol, 2011, 96: 938-48.

[23]

KonradA, ReinerMM, ThallerS, TilpM. The time course of muscle-tendon properties and function responses of a five‐minute static stretching exercise. Eur J Sport Sci, 2019, 19: 1195-203.

[24]

KooTK, LiMY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med, 2016, 15: 155-63.

[25]

KuboK, KanehisaH, FukunagaT. Effects of resistance and stretching training programmes on the viscoelastic properties of human tendon structures. J Physiol, 2002, 538: 219-26.

[26]

KuboK, KanehisaH, KawakamiY, FukunagaT. Influence of static stretching on viscoelastic properties of human tendon structures in vivo. J Appl Physiol, 2001, 90: 520-7.

[27]

KuznetsovaA, BrockhoffPB, ChristensenRHB. LmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw, 2017, 82: 1-26.

[28]

Lenth R, Singmann H, Love J, Buerkner P, Herve M. Package emmeans. 2019. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2025.

[29]

Lohse K, Kozlowski A, Strube MJ. Model specification in mixed-effects models. Commun Kinesiol. 2023;1:1–28. https://doi.org/10.51224/cik.2023.52

[30]

LoramID, MaganarisCN, LakieM. The passive, human calf muscles in relation to standing: the short range stiffness lies in the contractile component. J Physiol, 2007, 584: 677-92.

[31]

MagnussonS, AagardP, SimonsenE, Bojsen-MøllerF. A Biomechanical evaluation of Cyclic and static stretch in human skeletal muscle. Int J Sports Med, 1998, 19: 310-6.

[32]

MarchettiPH, MiyatakeMMS, MagalhaesRA, GomesWA, Da SilvaJJ, BrigattoFA, ZaniniTCC, BehmDG. Different volumes and intensities of static stretching affect the range of motion and muscle force output in well-trained subjects. Sports Biomech, 2022, 21: 155-64.

[33]

MazzoMR, WeinmanLE, GiustinoV, MclaganB, MaldonadoJ, EnokaRM. Changes in neural drive to calf muscles during steady submaximal contractions after repeated static stretches. J Physiol, 2021, 599: 4321-36.

[34]

McHughMP, CosgraveCH. To stretch or not to stretch: the role of stretching in injury prevention and performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2009.

[35]

McLeanL, GoudyN. Neuromuscular response to sustained low-level muscle activation: within- and between-synergist substitution in the triceps surae muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2004, 91: 204-16.

[36]

MorassoPG, SanguinetiV. Ankle muscle stiffness alone cannot stabilize balance during quiet standing. J Neurophysiol, 2002, 88: 2157-62.

[37]

NakamuraM, IkezoeT, TokugawaT, IchihashiN. Acute effects of stretching on passive properties of human gastrocnemius muscle–tendon unit: analysis of differences between hold-relax and static stretching. J Sport Rehabil, 2015, 24: 286-92.

[38]

NojiriS, IkezoeT, NakaoS, UmeharaJ, MotomuraY, YagiM, HironoT, IchihashiN. Effect of static stretching with different rest intervals on muscle stiffness. J Biomech, 2019, 90: 128-32.

[39]

PalmerTB, PinedaJG, CruzMR, Agu-UdembaCC. Duration-Dependent effects of passive static stretching on musculotendinous stiffness and maximal and rapid torque and surface electromyography characteristics of the hamstrings. J Strength Cond Res, 2019, 33: 717-26.

[40]

PensiniM, MartinA. Effect of voluntary contraction intensity on the H-reflex and V-wave responses. Neurosci Lett, 2004, 367: 369-74.

[41]

Readi NG, Rosso V, Rainoldi A, Vieira TMM. Do sweep rowers symmetrically activate their low back muscles during indoor rowing? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(4):e339–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12319

[42]

SeynnesOR, Bojsen-MøllerJ, AlbrachtK, ArndtA, CroninNJ, FinniT, MagnussonSP. Ultrasound-based testing of tendon mechanical properties: a critical evaluation. J Appl Physiol, 2015, 118: 133-41.

[43]

Shiavi R. Introduction to applied statistical signal analysis. Guide to biomedical and electrical engineering applications. Pittsburgh: Academic Press; 2010.

[44]

ShieldA, ZhouS. Assessing voluntary muscle activation with the twitch interpolation technique. Sports Med, 2004, 34: 253-67.

[45]

SimicL, SarabonN, MarkovicG. Does pre-exercise static stretching inhibit maximal muscular performance? A meta‐analytical review. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2013, 23: 131-48.

[46]

Takeuchi K, Nakamura M, Fukaya T, Konrad A, Mizuno T. Acute and long-term effects of static stretching on muscle-tendon unit stiffness: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci Med. 2023;22(3):465–75. https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2023.465

[47]

TrajanoGS, NosakaK, BlazevichAJ. Neurophysiological mechanisms underpinning Stretch-Induced force loss. Sports Med, 2017, 47: 1531-41.

[48]

TrajanoGS, NosakaK, SeitzB, BlazevichL. Intermittent stretch reduces force and central drive more than continuous stretch. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2014, 46: 902-10.

[49]

TrajanoGS, SeitzL, NosakaK, BlazevichAJ. Contribution of central vs. peripheral factors to the force loss induced by passive stretch of the human plantar flexors. J Appl Physiol, 2013, 115: 212-8.

[50]

VieiraTM, BotterA, MinettoMA, Hodson-ToleEF. Spatial variation of compound muscle action potentials across human gastrocnemius medialis. J Neurophysiol, 2015, 114: 1617-27.

[51]

VieiraTM, BotterA. The accurate assessment of muscle excitation requires the detection of multiple surface electromyograms. Exerc Sport Sci Rev, 2021, 49: 23-34.

[52]

VieiraTMM, MerlettiR, MesinL. Automatic segmentation of surface EMG images: improving the estimation of neuromuscular activity. J Biomech, 2010, 43: 2149-58.

[53]

VieiraTMM, MinettoMA, Hodson-ToleEF, BotterA. How much does the human medial gastrocnemius muscle contribute to ankle torques outside the sagittal plane?. Hum Mov Sci, 2013, 32: 753-67.

[54]

VitryF, MartinA, PapaiordanidouM. Impact of stimulation frequency on neuromuscular fatigue. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2019, 119: 2609-16.

[55]

WarnekeK, WirthK, KeinerM, LohmannLH, HillebrechtM, BrinkmannA, WohlannT, SchiemannS. Comparison of the effects of long-lasting static stretching and hypertrophy training on maximal strength, muscle thickness and flexibility in the plantar flexors. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2023, 123: 1773-87.

[56]

WatanabeK, VieiraTM, GallinaA, KouzakiM, MoritaniT. Novel insights into biarticular muscle actions gained from High-Density electromyogram. Exerc Sport Sci Rev, 2021, 49: 179-87.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Beijing Sport University

PDF

349

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/