Impact of a Novel Aquatic-Based Strength Program on Body Composition, Strength, and Quality of Life in Older Women: a 16-Week Randomized Controlled Trial
Alvaro Juesas , Carlos Babiloni-Lopez , Javier Gene-Morales , Pablo Jiménez-Martínez , Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo , Juan C. Colado
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise ›› : 1 -12.
Impact of a Novel Aquatic-Based Strength Program on Body Composition, Strength, and Quality of Life in Older Women: a 16-Week Randomized Controlled Trial
This study aimed to compare the effects of water- versus land-based resistance training on body composition (fat and muscle mass), strength (isometric and isokinetic), and health-related quality of life in older women.
Ninety-three apparently healthy volunteers (age: 68.91 ± 5.05 years) participated in this prospective randomized controlled trial and were divided into three groups with a block-design randomization sequence: (i) water-based training (WG) using drag devices at a fast-paced execution, (ii) land-based training (LG) using tornado devices at a moderate-paced execution, and (iii) control group (CG) with no training. The training program lasted 16 weeks, with two weekly sessions, each including three upper-limb and three lower-limb exercises. Both groups progressively increased intensity (rating of perceived exertion) and volume (sets) throughout the program. Each set lasted 40 s, with LG performing 10 repetitions (2 s concentric, 2 s eccentric) and WG performing as many repetitions as possible.
Significant group × time effects were found for body fat (P = 0.016, ηp2 = 0.13), upper-limb muscle mass (P = 0.027, ηp2 = 0.12), all isometric strength tests (P < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.45–0.57), and isokinetic knee extension at 60º/s and 180º/s (P = 0.001–0.013, ηp2 = 0.15–0.26). No significant differences were found between LG and WG in most variables (P > 0.05). The WG significantly improved isometric vertical row (d = 1.47), isokinetic knee extension (d = 0.41–1.11), physical function (d = 0.44), and body pain (d = 0.50), while the LG did not. Conversely, only the LG significantly reduced body fat (d = 0.24).
Although both training programs show similar results, power training in water significantly improves strength parameters and health-related quality of life, while moderate-paced resistance training on land effectively reduces body fat.
Muscle Strength / Resistance Training / Aging / Postmenopause / Rate of Perceived Exertion
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
American College of Sports Medicine |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
Hopkins WG. A new view of statistics. 2000. https://sportsci.org/resource/stats. Accessed 8 Oct 2024. |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |